PTL 2019-08-12

zoom bridge: https://zoom.us/j/283628617

Duration 60 minutes

Zoom Chat Log 

07:12:15 From Marco Platania (AT&T) : Aai version for ED should be 1.5.x
07:12:18 From Jessica W - LF : regarding SO, I replied to Seshu with how to fix his jobs that were not processing any docker images into snapshots
07:14:30 From Jimmy Forsyth (AT&T) : I am unblocked since our aai-common:1.5.3 artifact is released and can now release the other ED micro services; will be stepping thru the self-release process today (was blocked by failing tests for unknown reasons on centos on aai-common, so it had to be released manually)
07:15:17 From Jimmy Forsyth (AT&T) : We have staging dockers in aai/oom currently that Harish merged on Friday even though the Nexus artifacts aren’t released @Brian
07:19:46 From Jessica W - LF : Seshu, if you have a docker profile in pom.xml, then you just need to add "-P docker" into your mvn-params for your docker job
07:20:16 From Sai Seshu : Jess can you please help me out with this
07:20:43 From Sai Seshu : We have the profile on pom. Xml
07:21:07 From Sai Seshu : I sent you a snapshot of the same in the ticket
07:21:32 From Jessica W - LF : ik
07:21:33 From Jessica W - LF : ok
07:24:54 From Sai Seshu : Thanks
07:30:20 From Tony Hansen : https://lfprojects.org/policies/code-of-conduct/
07:30:28 From Tony Hansen : https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/PTL+2019-07-15
07:30:36 From Tony Hansen : https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/PTL+2019-07-01
07:30:51 From Mike Elliott : Need to drop for 30 minutes. Prudence will cover until I return.
07:31:05 From Tony Hansen : https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/
07:31:13 From Tony Hansen : those are all of the links that were shown
07:49:41 From Vijay Venkatesh Kumar : IT-17166 Self release support for projects with independent sub-project
08:07:32 From Keong : reference to specific files containing hard-coded passwords?
08:11:47 From Keong : how can passwords be used if the client is not running in a kubernetes pod?
08:17:31 From Brian : jim can you hear us
08:17:34 From Brian : we can hear you
08:17:41 From David McBride To Jim Baker (LFN)(privately) : we can hear you, but you can’t hear us
08:17:46 From Jim Baker (LFN) : No I cannot
08:17:47 From steven Wright : jim we can hear you, but can you hear us?
08:18:08 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : i'm also recording
08:23:31 From Keong : I thought the old style CSIT tests with mocked out components were to be replaced with a new style based on robot test cases and OOM deployment?
08:24:03 From Dan Timoney : Not sure if other PTLs have the same experience, but on my projects I have not gotten anyone to contribute to developing CSIT tests, and I’m on my own debugging issues with CSIT
08:24:21 From Catherine Lefèvre : the purpose is to test with real components, no mock-up otherwise it does not bring values
08:25:22 From Christophe Closset : it's a tradeoff - between running fast VS running the as close to the real thing
08:26:12 From Taka Cho : +1 for Dan, I am debugging CSIT for APPC

Action Items