PTL 2019-04-22
zoom bridge: https://zoom.us/j/283628617
Apr 22, 2019 |
|---|
Duration 60 minutes
Duration | Agenda Item | Requested by | Notes / Links |
|---|---|---|---|
START RECORDING | |||
5min | Casablanca maintenance release status | @Yang Xu @Mike Elliott | #1 (Yang): Update the Manifest on Readthedoc #2 (Mike): Tag the release and will add the version in Helm Chart. Expected sign-off: 2019-04-25 Yang reports that the basic test show 3.0.2 is OK and the manifest is updated - he asks the community to test 3.0.2 RC it as well. |
15min | Dublin end game plans | @Former user (Deleted) | RC0 date - 2019-05-02 RC0 templates due - 2019-04-30
Yellow status Release Requirements - move to POC by 2019-04-22 COB Critical defects - please stay on top of the merges Yang: Community does not get a chance to give feedback in late cycle - basically insuring a maintenance release immediately following the Sign-Off. Would like 2 wks from RC2 to sign-off/GA? |
10min | Dublin Vulnerability review - SECCOM Projects not yet reviewed | @Paweł Pawlak | Using Jira tickets for vulnerabilities that need attention. Tracking the release wide vulnerability table review process here: Dublin Tracking Table |
5min | NexusIQ demo | @Paweł Pawlak | Offline meeting recording: NEXUS-IQ tutorial 17042019.mp4 If you need more help reach out to @Amy Zwarico |
10min | License scans review - Winslow | @Steve Winslow (Deactivated) |  <DOWNLOAD the spreadsheet - preview in wiki doesn't work as well> Process: Prior to release the TSC legal subcommittee reviews and approves any license exceptions in dependencies. Steve has reached out to the projects that are using licenses that are not generally accepted. Reach out to swinslow@linuxfoundation.org What about binary files in the repo? Generally not desired - especially a compiled binary as license terms can be obfuscated. CSAR files for testing? Inside the files there are "proprietary notices" - that's what raises flags. |
Zoom Chat Log
Action Items
<2-15-2019> Preparing a preso for review of all known infrastructure change requests for review at PTL meeting 2-25-2019
<2019-04-08: global-jjb progress report: start on DCAE soon - focus on El Alto delivery (precursor to Dockerhub)<2019-04-22 - Using mvn staging plugins to deploy - unfort many of the changes need to be in the source code to insure the job is running>
Oom values.yaml or integration repo manifest (
if not covered - see TSC 2019-01-10
Quick discussion on nailing down whether we need a yaml override of the deployable
docker image tags in the oom repo (understanding is no) - with the integration docker manifest
(manifest is currently a copy of the oom values.yaml tags - not the reverse)
If not - then we need a documented procedure wiki/RTD on running a derived values.yaml override for the entire system before deployment
AAF is only an example here
https://git.onap.org/oom/tree/kubernetes/aaf/charts/aaf-service/values.yaml?h=casablanca#n28
drives
OOM Meeting Notes - 2019-03-13
<1-7/2019> Integration team to document the procedure.<01/13/2019> Answer from Integration team: docker manifest under integration repo is the source of truth, and is used by Integration team to override OOM values.yaml when deploying ONAP in Openlab. See the instructions at the bottom of page https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/casablanca/submodules/integration.git/docs/onap-oom-heat.html#onap-oom-heat-template
<1-21/2019> Procedure should include Timers, dependencies, etc.
just need to define all the --set and -f overrides like the following
sudo helm deploy onap local/onap --namespace $ENVIRON -f $DISABLE_CHARTS_YAML -f $DEV0_YAML $APPENDABLE_ENABLED_FLAGS --verbose
<1-28-2019>: Document how to handle the latest 3rd party image from github.
<2019-02-19>: One over-ride that will be shared, parent over-ride for docker versions, @Michael O'Brien to modify TSC-86 to reflect process. Still looking at tool to institute changes for all projects (single commit). @Mike Elliott @FREEMAN, BRIAN D @Gary Wu @Sylvain Desbureaux to follow up offline.
It should also consider the problem identified with the Casablanca Maintenance Release:https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4641
<2019-03-01 - Need a date for the delivery of the procedure >
<2019-04-08 New process defined - needs to be documented on the wiki @Brian Freeman
<2019-04-15>: Wiki pag: Managing Container Image Tags
Request from Rich Bennett about Storage/Persistent Data Architecture Plan/PTLs - Single NFS server?
<2019-04-22: performance issues with old config - have bare metal cluster - - want to bring in more realistic operational aspects to the testing - network storage vs direct, would like to place modules in isolation into the environment. Evaluating the utility of testing this way.
Meeting organized in May - https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/TSC+2019-05-16
<1-7/2019>: Work in progress. Schedule might shift to another week. Michael will follow-up with Mike. Training will be open to everybody. The objective is that each team will take over the management of their Helm Charts.
<1-28/2019>: Meeting is organized on 1/29 with LF. Training will be organized early in February. Additional information on the next PTL call (2/4)<2019-2-19: Meeting on this topic today - review the process - develop training material. OOM subcharts complete - A&AI this week><2019-03-04: Ready to do the first project A&AI; after testing on the first project make video on process flow, several others will follow @Jessica Gonzalez @Mike Elliott><still working out the A&AI details - in progress; once the POC is complete the other repos will follow>https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/79580/<2019-04-08: LF releng - Pushed a patch to a code transfer (test) branch to test out an approach and testing verify job. Once proved out need to work with down stream CI/CD before wholesale push. ><2019-04-22: Ready to start on A&AI -will kick off today!>