Duration 90 minutes - https://zoom.us/j/661303200

@4pm CET/10am EST/7am PST/10pm China Time/7.30pm India Time

Yangs-MacBook-Air:oom yang$ find . -name 'values.yaml' -exec grep -H image {} \; | grep onap  | grep image | cut -d':' -f3- | grep -E -i "staging|snapshot" | sort  
  onap/network-discovery:1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-latest
  onap/service-decomposition:1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/aai/esr-gui:1.4.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/aai/esr-server:1.4.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/appc-cdt-image:1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/appc-image:1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/clamp-dashboard-kibana:4.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/clamp-dashboard-logstash:4.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/clamp:4.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/data-router:1.4-STAGING-latest
 onap/dmaap/dmaap-bc:1.1.4-STAGING-latest
 onap/elasticsearch-sg:1.4-STAGING-latest
 onap/fproxy:2.1-STAGING-latest
 onap/msb/msb_apigateway:1.2.4-STAGING-latest
 onap/msb/msb_apigateway:1.2.4-STAGING-latest
 onap/msb/msb_discovery:1.2.3-STAGING-latest
 onap/policy-apex-pdp:2.1-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/policy-api:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/policy-distribution:2.1.0-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/policy-pap:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/policy-pdpd-cl:1.4-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/policy-pe:1.4-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/policy-pe:1.4-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/policy-pe:1.4-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/policy-xacml-pdp:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest
 onap/portal-app:2.5.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/portal-db:2.5.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/portal-sdk:2.5.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/portal-wms:2.5.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/rproxy:2.1-STAGING-latest
 onap/search-data-service:1.4-STAGING-latest
 onap/testsuite:1.4.0-STAGING-latest
 onap/tproxy-config:2.1-STAGING-latest
 onap/vfc/db:1.3.0-STAGING-latest

Zoom Chat Log 

06:56:02 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic rollcall
06:56:13 From bin.yang@windriver.com : #info Bin Yang, Wind River
06:56:28 From Yipan Deng (Intel) : #info proxy Yipan Deng, Intel Corp. (Proxy for Srinivasa Addepalli)
06:57:48 From Chaker Al-Hakim : #info Chaker Al-Hakim, Huawei
06:58:07 From Yan Chen : #info Yan Chen, China Telecom
07:00:23 From Andreas Geissler (Deutsche Telekom) : #info Andreas Geissler, DT
07:00:30 From Eric Debeau : #info Eric Debeau, Orange
07:00:39 From Jason Hunt : #info Jason Hunt, IBM
07:00:44 From Brian : #info Brian.Freeman, AT&T (proxy in case Catherine is delayed)
07:00:46 From Stephen Terrill : #info Stephen Terrill, Ericsson
07:01:12 From Chandler Lee : Chandler Lee, Huawei
07:01:24 From Alexis de Talhouët : #info, Alexis de Talhouët, Bell Canada
07:02:22 From NingSo : #info Ning So, Reliance Jio
07:02:24 From Timo Perala (Nokia) : #info Timo Perala, Nokia
07:03:00 From Lingli : #info Lingli, CMCC
07:03:08 From Mike Elliott : #info Mike Elliott, Amdocs (as proxy)
07:03:13 From Davide Cherubini : #info Davide Cherubini, proxy Vodafone
07:04:22 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic Dublin RC0 Folloow-ups
07:06:25 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : Integration still waiting on DMaaP and Portal released images - Mandar checking
07:07:04 From Murat Turpcu,Turk Telekom : #info Murat Turpcu, Turk Telekom
07:07:27 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : Integration waiting on released images for Wave 2
07:08:20 From Viswa ( Verizon ) : #info Viswa, Verizon
07:08:45 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @murat @viswa -thanks
07:09:17 From Taka Cho : APPC has been working with Jess for new jjb change this whole week. APPC java has been released. the APPC docker should be released by COB of today.
07:10:38 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : Yang please resist temptation to fix anything but high/highest bugs
07:10:52 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : ^^Yang asks
07:11:08 From Milind Jalwadi : #info Milind Jalwadi, TechMahindra
07:11:20 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @milind. thanks
07:11:54 From Eric Debeau : #info Results on Oeange PF: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16976?reply=1
07:11:54 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : 3 weeks of testing - 4 weeks to go
07:13:43 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Pam good progress with control-loop. expected handoff tomorrow
07:16:52 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #info pairwise testing
07:17:24 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Michael logging has now passed
07:18:40 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Pam policy has done as much as can be done without usecase owners validating.
07:18:45 From Michael O'Brien : @Michael to update weather board wiki
07:20:04 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Yang SB01 and SB02 now set up for use by dev test
07:21:45 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Martial clamp to release today
07:22:25 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Shankar oof now complete
07:23:09 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #info integration blockers
07:23:35 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : current & up to date thanks
07:23:48 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #info high/highest bugs
07:24:32 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : reviewed by @Jim and @Yang yesterday - few candidates for deferrment
07:25:06 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Pam a lot of policy fixes are in. just need to be verified
07:25:52 From Tony Hansen : SECCOM has been filing some tickets this week
07:26:10 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Jim also asks not to inject anything but high/highest
07:26:22 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #info Documentation
07:26:42 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : need to ramp up doc updates.
07:27:06 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #info overall project status
07:28:03 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : multicloud has requested a waiver for code coverage
07:28:16 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/Project+Status+in+Dublin+Release
07:30:42 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : discussion over what a waiver means? what is the plan?
07:32:23 From Michael O'Brien : Topic: multicloud waiver - for sonar coverage - this is minor in my opinion if it is below 55 as it is 51.5 not something like 20 or 0
07:32:32 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Bin multicloud aszure can be descoped from Dublin if necessarry . Coverage @ 51.5 % from 55% goal -n feel it is low risk
07:32:46 From Michael O'Brien : Opinion: low risk
07:33:15 From Eric Debeau : is multicloud/azure used in a use-case or a end-to-end test case ?
07:33:36 From bin.yang@windriver.com : not yet as far as I know
07:33:52 From Michael O'Brien : I would definitely not drop multicloud from the release for 3.5% code coverage - as the sonar coverage is already arbitrary - as in the 55 might be covering non-critical code - we don’t knwo
07:34:09 From Brian : azure is one of those we want to exapnd our testing base.
07:34:48 From chair architecture : good morning, have a hard stop at 8AM PDT. hope we can start ETSI ENI discussion soon
07:34:48 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Jonathan- aaf-authz have been adding more junit coverage. @39.5 of 40%
07:36:05 From Brian : AT&T supports granting an exception for the Multi-Cloud Azure - its a useful pluging to continue
07:36:37 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : Making progress against the goal even thought we widn't get the resource that was expected
07:37:55 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : sdc will also be looking for a code coverage waiver.
07:39:22 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic ETSI ENI
07:39:45 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Uri shared his slides
07:57:36 From Alex’s iPhone 6 : this not ok. he is interfering with our zsm plans
07:58:20 From Eric Debeau : @Alex: can you clarify ?
07:58:51 From Pamela Dragosh : Is there an overlap here with what ZSM is doing?
07:59:15 From Vimal Begwani -- ATT : This overlaps with DCAE, we don't need external ENI. DCAE is the right place to deploy ML models
07:59:18 From Alex’s iPhone 6 : we need to align how this fits into the etsi zsm closed loop approach.
07:59:44 From Alex’s iPhone 6 : unfortunately we didn’t get a chance to have that alignment yet.
08:00:30 From Alex’s iPhone 6 : ideally emu would be part of what we call “domain intelligence” in ZSM.
08:00:58 From Alex’s iPhone 6 : that’s ENI, not emu
08:01:34 From Brian : architecture team needs to assess - this seems duplicative with work we are already doing
08:04:02 From Lingli : We have implemented the so called external ENI box with DCAE in VoLTE usecase in Amsterdam.
08:04:15 From Vimal Begwani -- ATT : @Brian, I agree. There could be a simpler approach to incorporate AI / ML model DCAE, take full advange of closed loop automation already supported
08:04:46 From Lingli : We can use DCAE.
08:04:59 From Vimal Begwani -- ATT : @Lingli +1
08:05:06 From Lingli : instead of having another external box
08:05:47 From Lingli : I did not see ENI helping out with anything else that DCAE could not solve.
08:05:55 From Vijay Venkatesh Kumar : There is work also proposed (future release) part of Acumos/ONAP integration to allows AI/ML models be ingested into ONAP and deploy them under DCAE. This could be handled as similar integration case.
08:06:05 From Srini Addepalli (Intel) : The way I see it is that ENI block shown can be implemented using DCAE. But the main takeway is that ENI group is defining APIs between MANO and anlaytics.
08:06:23 From Ramki Krishnan : Does this work with overlap with the work happening in Acumos?
08:06:28 From Lingli : +1 @Vimal
08:06:34 From Srini Addepalli (Intel) : I guess if ENI is chosen, then DCAE may need to support the APIs defined by ETSI
08:07:01 From Lingli : We are fine with existing APIs
08:07:40 From Eric Debeau : +1 with Vimal and Ramki.
08:07:46 From Jim Baker (LFN) : #topic LF infrastructure
08:09:59 From Keong Lim k00759777 : "The work in ONAP, together with our activities in ETSI-ZSM, will lead the industry towards a fully automated network and service management. " ... from https://www.lfnetworking.org/resources/2018/07/19/embracing-openness-to-power-future-network-services/
08:11:10 From Michael O'Brien : Thanks Jessica - didn’t know about July 19th cert - high priority then
08:14:18 From Jim Baker (LFN) : #topic community coordinators
08:15:57 From Michael O'Brien : #topc Yang and Brian as committers - excellent
08:17:21 From Jim Baker (LFN) : #topic ONAP architecture
08:20:32 From Jim Baker (LFN) : TSC agrees with ONAP architecture 4.0.9 without disagreement
08:20:38 From Alexis de Talhouët : agreed :) Thank Steve and team for leading this.
08:21:27 From Jim Baker (LFN) : #topic TOSCA parsing
08:24:20 From Jim Baker (LFN) : Architectural changes need to be discussed early in the release and not just at the end
08:28:07 From Jim Baker (LFN) : #topic El-Alto schedule
08:28:53 From Timo Perala (Nokia) : Let's come back to El-Alto in a later TSC call, ok?
08:29:29 From Michael O'Brien : Pentests are very interesting - thank you - would like to see the results
08:30:29 From Michael O'Brien : #topic penitent: good work - Pierre, Pawel
08:32:34 From Srini Addepalli (Intel) : Is June DDF for R6 proposals? Or would there be another DDF for R6?
08:33:56 From Jim Baker (LFN) : #topic Doc hackathon
08:35:16 From Michael O'Brien : thanks Jim for running the meeting - good afternoon, good morning and good night
08:36:03 From Michael O'Brien : RC1 = 16th

Zoom Attendance Log  

TSC Members Attendance based on Zoom Chat Log: 100%

TSC Decisions  

2019 TSC Decisions

Action Items:

• El Alto M3 checklist improvements for the security questions. Paweł Pawlak
• (SECCOM): Review Vulnerabilities that require significant rework, architecture change as "TSC MUST Have" candidates for El Alto
• (Mike E./Manoop): Revalidate the OOM Chain for Portal - Dublin Release
• (TSC): TSC to provide feedback about the ONAP Internship Program proposal