2019-02-14 AAI Developers Meeting
Attachments (including meeting recording)
Chat Server
private group aai-dev on Rocketchat server: http://onap-integration.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com:3000/group/aai-dev
Agenda Items
START RECORDING
Title | Responsible | Status | Last discussed | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shared Cassandra Database | @Mahendra Raghuwanshi @Roger Maitland | Open |
| Regarding https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/OOM-1194 / https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/OOM-1199:
|
| 2 | Change PNF to use pnf-id as unique key | @Benjamin Cheung @Chesla Wechsler @David Perez Caparros @Former user (Deleted) @Matthieu Geerebaert | Open |
| Potentially breaking change: https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2096 See also: Questions:
@William LaMont will check for existing migration utility that handles this use case (changing the key from one existing attribute to another) @James Forsyth will socialize the breaking change on the PNF in the next PTL call so clients can prepare to do a search for ?pnf-name=${pnf-name} instead of /pnfs/pnf/${pnf-name}. They also need to handle doing the PUT operation differently - Added to PTL agenda PTL 2019-02-19 |
| 3 | AAI-BBS for Dublin | @Keong Lim | Open |
| Started collating proposed changes in wiki AAI-BBS Proposals for Dublin Release Added https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2154: discussions about options. Perhaps some of this should go into the "AAI data model principles document"?
|
| 4 | AAI REST API | @THIRILOSHINI KRISHNAKUMAR | Open |
|
The reason behind the question is that, I’ll have to get Nodes from SDNC (third party) and add it to AAI. When there are 100s of nodes, making more than 100 API calls individually to add the nodes becomes expensive.
If the bulk operation is not supported, Can you please help me understand if there is any specific reason for not supporting it ?
2. I added some p-interfaces as part of adding a pnf. Please find below a sample json that I used. I use POSTMAN for all REST operations. The API to add the PNF: PUT https://10.1.8.105:8443/aai/v14/network/pnfs/pnf/T310-NE4 INPUT: { "pnf-name": "T310-NE4", "in-maint": false, "p-interfaces": { "p-interface": [ { "interface-name": "otu-1/1/0/E1.1", "in-maint": false }, { "interface-name": "otu-1/2/0/E1.1", "in-maint": false } ] } }
The pnf addition was successful. When I try to fetch the pnf, I expected to see the p-interfaces as well under the pnf element as that’s how I see in the pnf model. But I had to make a separate GET API call to see the interfaces.
The API to get the pnf: GET https://10.1.8.105:8443/aai/v14/network/pnfs/pnf/T310-NE4 OUTPUT: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <pnf xmlns="http://org.onap.aai.inventory/v14"> <pnf-name>T310-NE4</pnf-name> <pnf-id>059b7753-0c29-3407-a855-11174a1c77bc</pnf-id> <in-maint>false</in-maint> <resource-version>1550012822891</resource-version> </pnf>
----- I expected to see the p-interfaces in the above output
The API to get the p-interfaces: GET https://10.1.8.105:8443/aai/v14/network/pnfs/pnf/T310-NE4/p-interfaces OUTPUT: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <p-interfaces xmlns="http://org.onap.aai.inventory/v14"> <p-interface><interface-name>otu-1/2/0/E1.1</interface-name><resource-version>1550012823703</resource-version><in-maint>false</in-maint></p-interface> <p-interface><interface-name>otu-1/1/0/E1.1</interface-name><resource-version>1550012824476</resource-version><in-maint>false</in-maint></p-interface> </p-interfaces> @James Forsyth will fix the missing link on the bulk APIs documentation - https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2157 |
| 5 | range query | @Keong Lim | In Progress | 7th Feb 2019 |
Invite @Arul Nambi and @CT Paterson to next week's dev call to talk about how sparky/elastic does partial/range matches
|
| 6 | Image footprint reduction as part of CIA project | @Paul-Ionut Vaduva | In Progress | 7th Feb 2019 | Reduction in size is mostly onf aai-common image as that based on ubuntu. 2/7 - Move the base image to be a part of ONAP Build, maybe aai-common repo @Venkata Harish Kajur will create a Jira for it in Dublin Release Move the aai-common Dockerfile RUN into the resources, traversal, graphadmin, cacher, schema service microservice |
| 7 | AAI Questions | @THIRILOSHINI KRISHNAKUMAR | Done | 7th Feb 2019 | We are trying to bring in transport network into ONAP as part of CCVPN usecase. We have some questions on AAI for the same. - We are using a SDN controller which exposes TAPI Rest APIs. I'll have to map the TAPI model to ONAP AAI Model to add the topology to AAI. We are planning to use a mediation which does the model mapping and push the topology to AAI. Is this approach valid or Is there any other standard approach of doing it ? Is there any example that i can refer to where somebody has done mapping from one model to AAI model. - Are there any examples of AAI Rest API to add/delete/update nodes,its interfaces and links to and from AAI inventory that i can refer to ? - The AAI model, may i know if it follows any standards ? - In the model under physical link and logical link, i do not see any endpoint information. May i know how the links are formed when it doesnt know what the endpoints are - We have a onap cluster running Beijing version. Is there any standard approach of upgrading it to Casablanca. Casablanca RESTAPI Documentation 2019-02-06 AAI Meeting Notes Amit Sinha discussed an approach for upgrading version |
| 8 | Schema-service roadmap | @James Forsyth @Former user (Deleted) | On Hold | 31th Jan 2019 | The schema-service is ready. Currently it provides file-sharing capabilities in terms of schema/edgerule files. In order for GraphGraph to take advantage of the schema parsing/processing in schema-service additional abstractions have to be implemented on top of the crude file2string functionality currently in schema-service. Open question:
@Venkata Harish Kajurwill ask @Manisha Aggarwalif the current functionality of the schema-service is the final version for Dublin and if there will be further enhancements in next releases. Postponed until 21st February 2019 when the position of ecomp regarding schema-service functionality should be clear |
| 9 | New AAF Certificates at startup | In Progress | 24th Jan 2019 | AAF will generate certificates to the be used by the containers at startup; AAI services should use the run-time generated certs instead of the ones that are in the repos or oom charts. In dublin the services will mount a volume with certificates. This is on the roadmap for Dublin as a feature.
@James Forsythwill ask Jonathan Gatham when the certificate init image is going to be available in ONAP and wether it is documented Jan 31, 2019 | |
| 10 | AAI Backup and Restore | @Keong Lim | On Hold | 10th Jan 2019 | @FREEMAN, BRIAN D asked on Re: Backup and Restore Solution: ONAP-OOM :
What is the AAI strategy for backup and restore? What is the overall ONAP strategy for backup and restore? Should it be unified with the data migration strategy as per "Hbase to Cassandra migration" on 2018-11-14 AAI Meeting Notes? @James Forsythwill raise the topic of having backups and restore functionality in ONAP - if it is feasible, on the roadmap and what others PTL think Jimmy didn't directly raise the topic but there was movement - @Keong Lim asked "if istio service mesh is a no-go, is there a replacement for secure onap communications? is backup/restore/upgradability included in s3p?" @Michael O'Brien replied that a reference tool set for backup and restore was introduced in Casablanca: Backup and Restore Solution: ONAP-OOM @Mike Elliott said he would look at Brian's question, AAI will provide support as needed. |
| 11 | aai-cassandra performance issues | @Keong Lim | On Hold | 10th Jan 2019 | @Michael O'Brien has documented performance issues in aai-cassandra:
Is there something that should be tweaked in AAI config? Or documentation on the recommended setup to run the VM? I'll come to the next AAI meet (conflicts with pomba meet) - https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/LOG-376 20190108 work continues to find the cause - I see 7 vCore spikes on cassandra as well as a saturated logstash on that particular vm - we are no longer a DaemonSet (13 instances on a 13+1 cluster) - I will reduce the current ReplicaSet from 5 to 2 or 1 until I can label the nodes and/or find out what is causing ls to saturate - @Prudence Au and Sanjay Agraharam mentioned cassandra - I have seen cs high on several "top" sessions - will post screen caps - bottom line is correlation - I have a 2nd cluster where I can just run aai,dmaap and log LOG Meeting Minutes 2019-01-15 https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/LOG-915 ask Michael O'Brien about performance problems - if they persist and what the problem exactly is. @Venkata Harish Kajur will inform Michael about the schema performance fix - he should test with the casablanca maintenance release. On-hold for 3 weeks (end of January) - if until then no performance issues reported agenda item will be closed |
| 12 | get notified of AAI Cassandra issues automatically | @Keong Lim | In Progress | 24th Jan 2019 | @Mike Elliott wrote in OOM Meeting Notes - 2018-12-5
Keep an eye out for new issues! Question: @Keong Lim should this be part of a larger A&AI monitoring and failure prevention initiative |
| 13 | Purpose of fields in AAI | @Keong Lim | Open |
| @Dénes Németh wrote in https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-1104:
Questions: 1. Is AAI intended to strictly prescribe how the fields are used and what contents are in the values? Even if (1) is true, AAI is not really in any position to enforce how clients use the data, so really (2) is always true and we need to consult the original producers of the data and the ultimate consumers of the data to document their intended meanings. How do we push to have documentation on the purpose and meaning of the fields in AAI? Where does all this documentation go? Should the documentation be backed up by validation code? See also discussion about AAI in 2018-11-28 ExtAPI Meeting notes 29th Nov: Started on new wiki page AAI Schema Producer-Consumer Pairings |
| 14 | Copyright license header restricted to 1 company | @Former user (Deleted) | Open | 24th Jan 2019 | In the copyright /** * ============LICENSE_START======================================================= * org.onap.aai * ================================================================================ * Copyright © 2017-2018 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved.
If there is a company other than AT&T the build fails saying the license header is wrong New cases found in gerrit reviews on aai/traversal: @Keong Lim to try a license change in aai/resources to see if it also fails the same verify job. |
| 15 | Return codes and messages for WS | @Former user (Deleted) | Open |
| Is there a guide for the description of the error message and the error codes? How are new error states (message + code) added? |
| 16 | OOM Artifacts | @Former user (Deleted) | Open |
| Some of our top level OOM deployment artifacts are not unique (i.e. don’t take namespace into account as all other deployables), is that intentional? |
| 17 | AAI test data bootstrap | @Keong Lim | Open |
| Looking at AAI usage in OOF - HPA guide for integration testing by @Dileep Ranganathan, wondering whether there is a better way to bootstrap AAI test data?
Similarly, @Scott Seabolt and @J / @Joss Armstrong wrote for APPC Sample A&AI Data Setup for vLB/vDNS for APPC Consumption and Script to load vLB into AAI:
Similarly: Related https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-1948 on the brittleness of the ReadTheDocs links to data files. One for VIM: How-To: Register a VIM/Cloud Instance to ONAP and https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-1928 Potential issues:
|
| 18 | AAI too slow for OOF/HAS | @Keong Lim | Open |
| Under OOF Homing and Allocation Service (HAS) section, @Dileep Ranganathan wrote about Project Specific enhancements:
See also https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/OPTFRA-268 / https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/OPTFRA-291 Similarly to the "AAI too slow for Holmes" item below, this introduction of extra caching of AAI data is a worrisome development and sad indictment of the performance of the system architecture. What can we do about this? Would the AAI Cacher https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-1337 help to improve performance? |
| 19 | MultiCloud usage of AAI for HPA telemetry/time-series data to OOF | @Keong Lim | Open |
| @Bin Yang and @Lianhao Lu (Deactivated) wrote in https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/MULTICLOUD-274:
and
and
Some concerns:
|
| 20 | Orchestration Scenarios for VNFs | @Keong Lim | Open |
| Comments on Orchestration Scenarios related to AAI: @Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya / @kspviswa said:
and @Fernando Oliveira replied:
As I understand, ESR has "esr-vnfm-list", which has an "esr-vnfm", which has "esr-system-info-list", which has "esr-system-info", which has a "relationship-list" that can contain relationships to "generic-vnf" and other AAI objects. The "generic-vnf" object also contains "self-link", "ipv4OamAddress", "ipv4OamGatewayAddress", etc, which links the AAI object back to its "source-of-truth" external-system. Is there some new data, new schema or new API that is required on top of this? @Fernando Oliveira; Apologies for my lack of knowledge, but a few comments:
@Bo Lv can comment more on the current ESR capabilities, but I believe there are only 3 kinds of systems so far: EMS, VNFM and third-party SDNC. ESR could be extended to handle VNFO as another kind of system. @Fernando Oliveira : I created JIRA stories: for various parts of the scenario. |
| 21 | Modeling team R4 discussion, including extra AAI attributes in a model-driven way | @Keong Lim | In Progress | 15th Nov 2018 | Modelling team having Service Instance thoughts by Chesla Wechsler, which will affect AAI schema. Also referred from comments on ONAP R4+ Service Modeling Discussion Calls
|