2020-02-26 AAI Meeting Notes
Attachments (including meeting recording):
Attendees:
Johnshe
Status | OPEN | IN PROGRESS | ON HOLD | DONE | CANCELLED |
---|
START RECORDING
1 | Frankfurt Defects |
| |||
2 | SOTNNI use case | https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/aai/schema-service/+/102298 | |||
3 | Service model and schema impact | Benjamin Cheung | |||
4 | Security Requirements for pods | James Forsyth | |||
5 | OPEN | Graphgraph not included in OOM deployment. How can we make it an essential part of the ONAP deployment. Step 0: Make it stable. Fix the docker build Jenkins jobs for graphgraph, may need to upgrade to a version of npm to be acceptable to graphgraph. Needs to fit into the LF global-job jobs. | |||
6 | Fred from Verizon | OPEN | How do we accelerate migration using A&AI and the RunTime DB solution Proposed a topic to be explored by AI&I and other ONAP WGs. High impact, common interest among most CSPs Status Quo: Most operators have multiple, siloed, possibly overlapping topology and inventory (domain specific) databases Goal is to integrate ALL Inventory, and Topology databases into a Unified AI&I Architecture modeled DB which would contain ALL VNFs (VMs/Containers), PNFs, plus support easy expansion for future Inventory & Topology constructs/technologies. May take considerable time/investment (both are short).
Targeted Objectives
How to accelerate the migration to Unified Database?
| ||
7 | SONAR coverage report | DONE | https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/onap/projects - AAI-2793Getting issue details... STATUSJames Forsyth, the main reason behind these discrepancies is the fact that SonarQube is based on version 6.7.1 and SonarCoud is version 8+ After migrating to SonarCloud, we fetch updates they do automatically without the need of doing any manual upgrade. Since we migrated, few things have changed. For example:
You can find more info in the wiki :https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/SonarCloud+migration+from+SonarQube Update 19 Feb: All Fixed except: aai-sparky-be, aai-esr-server and aai-validation. Jimmy is working on them. | ||
8 | Looking for volunteer to fix papyrus issue | OPEN | |||
9 | Spring boot upgrade issue | DONE | |||
10 | sparky and data-router certificate issue | Francis Paquette | IN PROGRESS | ||
11 | Collab efforts | IN PROGRESS | |||
12 | Windriver Lab Change | DONE | The Intel/Wind River lab was relocated into a new data center last week. The only change required to connect to the new location is to update the VPN IP in the .ovpn file. Here is the change: [sgooch@atl-sgooch-lx ~]$ diff -u pod-onap-01.ovpn.org pod-onap-01.ovpn --- pod-onap-01.ovpn.org 2020-01-13 13:03:03.960856010 -0500 +++ pod-onap-01.ovpn 2020-01-09 18:27:03.560549576 -0500 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ client dev tun proto tcp -remote 192.55.48.241 443 +remote 146.152.204.133 443 resolv-retry infinite auth-nocache nobind | ||
13 | Discuss developers call time | DONE | Tuesdays @ 9 AM US/Eastern, 19:30 India Standard Time | ||
14 | SO query in AAI | DONE | NNI Use Case - discovering 2 topologies from the network Use case is asking for the ability in AAI to link an underlay and overlay together by having a cousin relationship between 2 PNFs. Asking Chandra Cinthalato verify if that edge rule can be added for the Frankfurt release. Per Chandra: "I think pnf -> pnf edge is redundant and not needed as we can traverse (thru a logical or physical interface) from pnf -> p-interface/l-interface -> pnf."
Chandra Cinthala please note: According to shashikanth.vh, the team requires a relationship from an overlay topology node to an underlay topology node; by using the p-interface in overlay we cannot traverse to underlay node. Suggest to allow an edge for PNF→PNF, which is consistent with RFC 8345 model | ||
15 | Search guard issue | Giulio Graziani | ON HOLD | Merged and released yesterday; issue is closed. - AAI-2617Getting issue details... STATUS Tracking for Frankfurt: - AAI-2677Getting issue details... STATUS Search guard container no longer available so elasticsearch-sg won't build. Search guard allows us to secure the elastic communication, which in older versions was not available but newer versions have support for secure communication. https://www.elastic.co/blog/dear-search-guard-users Consider opendistro as replacement for search-guard Can we consider this one: https://docs.search-guard.com/latest/search-guard-community-edition | |
16 | E2E Network Slicing | LIN MENG | DONE | For the E2E Network Slicing use case for Frankfurt Release, we intend to leverage the nested service model work that has been going on since Dublin release. From A&AI perspective, we foresee that the schemas would have to be enhanced to cover network slicing models. We have considered A&AI to be a stretch goal for Frankfurt, though we are committing resources. So, we would like to start the discussion in the coming weeks, and subsequently implementation work to try our best to complete the implementation for Frankfurt. AAI-2600 has been created just to indicate the SDC impacts, we will update it with more details, and also join the A&AI weekly call during the next 1-2 weeks to discuss further. | |
17 | Portal SDK Upgrade | IN PROGRESS | - AAI-2726Getting issue details... STATUS Francis Paquette need evaluation of feasibility in Frankfurt for sparky | ||
18 | GraphGraph Image Missing in Nexus | Venkata Harish Kajur | OPEN | Graph Graph Images are missing from nexus and it needs to be resolved in order for elalto deployment to be successful. OOM-2161 How did this docker image get pushed to nexus and why was it removed from nexus? Graphgraph was removed from the default helm chart, but we still need to get these jobs fixed.
| |
19 | Data-router not starting | IN PROGRESS | Assigned - AAI-2727Getting issue details... STATUS to Steve Blimkie | ||
20 | Cassandra 3 | DONE | SDC wants to move up to Cassandra 3 in the shared db environment. - AAI-2731Getting issue details... STATUS https://old-docs.janusgraph.org/0.3.2/version-compat.html | ||
21 | Java 11 | James Forsyth | ON HOLD | Venkata Harish Kajur tried schema service, a couple of dependency changes were required to get it to start. Eclipselink that is currently configured is incompatible. <groupId>javax.activation</groupId> is also incompatible Needs more investigation for other repos Need new common image (which Alpine image would we pick?) | |
22 | AAI UI Issue | ||||
23 | AAI Committers |
Peng He is a potential committer on ESR (currently only Jimmy can commit ESR code) | |||
24 | Code Test Coverage | Goal for Frankfurt is 55% AAI-Common 58.7
| |||
25 | Upcoming R6 Functional Requirements | Benjamin Cheung | IN PROGRESS | Release 6 (Frankfurt) proposed use cases and functional requirements Use Case Realization Call: September 25, 2019 - AAI-2600Getting issue details... STATUS We have created REQ-158 - for this use case. For AAI impacts, we have created AAI-2600 - A&AI support of Network Slicing Demo in Frankfurt.Reg. details of the AAI impacts, this is still being worked out, as there is an alternative proposal, and we are trying to align w.r.to scope & impacts. We will share more details in the coming days. The overall use case will also be presented to the Architecture Sub-committee for approval (based on the f2f discussions that happened in Antwerp 2 weeks ago). - AAI-2670Getting issue details... STATUS
- AAI-2671Getting issue details... STATUS We are currently reviewing the list of items we found in the BBWF BBS testing and once we sort through them we will communicate the results back to ONAP community. Regarding AAI specifically, we do not foresee any new requirements for Frankfurt, but we would like to conclude the review first before jumping to final conclusions. - AAI-2672Getting issue details... STATUS
- AAI-2673Getting issue details... STATUS We are not expecting any changes at this time. Tech Mahindra is working on populating a&ai with the VNF specific information from K8S. There is a chance that we realize some changes to the schema, but we don’t expect any changes to the code. - AAI-2674Getting issue details... STATUS During run-time solution there are AAI impacts. Run-time solution is not planned for Frankfurt release. Only Import Service Catalog solution in SDC is targeted for F release. AAI Impact highlights: After Service Order decomposition in SO, CFS Service Instance details will be stored in AAI. After response from 3^rd^ Party Domain, RFS instance details will be updated in AAI. The sequence diagram depicts the run time view of Third Party Order Activation using the on-boarded service definition and highlights AAI impacts. ReUse in AAI: We plan to leverage the SPPartner model, created for CCVPN, to store the 3^rd^ Party details in AAI. org.onap.aai.domain.yang.SpPartner present in aai-schema v15
- AAI-2623Getting issue details... STATUS Have done some prototyping in Dublin to ingest topology from external controllers and show them in A&AI. Will need more work to act on notifications from controllers and keep the topology in sync - AAI-2678Getting issue details... STATUS For the 5G Bulk PM use case in R6, I’m attaching a few slides showing how we think AAI can be used as part of the UC realization. We are currently making the following assumptions:
Can you review the slides and the assumptions above and let us know if you see any issue. We can also setup a separate meeting if needed. Note: I will share the same slides on the SO weekly meeting today. Frankfurt Release Requirements
| |
26 | Migration | Ankit Bhatt | IN PROGRESS | What is the purpose of MigrateCloudRegionUpgradeCycle mig |