Parallel Session MSO

Purpose

This template is to be used for the “Parallel Deep Dive Sessions to Align with architecture / Use cases” at the may ONAP developers event

Instructions.

The purpose of each section is to translate the use cases and functional architecture into specific identified needs for the components, and to identify potential projects to be proposed.  There are three parts to this exercise:

  1. Identify needs based on the use case and architecture on this module, and potential dependencies on other modules or external artifacts.

  2. Group these into projects.  Consider that coding, documentation, and testing is required.   Include an initial scope for the project.

  3. If time, mapping the needs into the projects.

The need identification table has the following columns

-          Identified need: <slogan for the identified need>

-          Brief need description: <a few sentences describing the need>

-          Driver:<Related use case or architecture change, if any>

-          Dependencies:<identify dependencies on other modules or artifacts (e.g. other onap module, models, …)

-          Project: <If time, after the projects are identified, suggest in which project the need would best fit>

Time keeping suggestion:  The exercise time is 45 minutes.  A good practice would be to split into 20 minutes on need identification and 20 minutes on project proposals.

Exercise output.

ONAP Meeting Session name: <insert onap module name>

Need Identification:

Identified Need

Description

Driver

Dependencies

Project fit
(if time)

Homing function

View of placement



A&AI will have a view of where capacity will be



orchestration of multiple VNFs









imperative vs. declarative approaches









VNF configuration

interface between SO and AppC







Platform orchestrator and resource orchestrator

provider software that runs on top of OpenStack (and others???)

resource orchestrator needed for A&AI (pre-populate database) – need further discussion about role







support for Multi-VIM

merge with platform orchestrator? needs more discussion







service optimization framework

for instantiation, changes, etc.



A&AI, DCAE, Policy



SO/orchestrator federation

geographically distributed orchestrators (scale and federation); hierarchical



could relate to other entities as well



SO scale

geographically distributed orchestrators (scale and federation); hierarchical







service chaining

execute service chain per user







scaling/healing of underlying components











Is this a framework or a single multi-technology orchestrator?







monitoring

monitor the orchestrator and recovery





























Project proposals.

[repeat for each project.  Note: This is not a complete project proposal skeleton, only sufficient enough for this discussion]

Project 1:Service Orchestrator

Project Name: Service Orchestrator

-          Provide a brief project name.

Project Description

-         Take and evolve the service orchestration module to support various controllers

Scope:

-         Service orchestration

  • interface to "multi-VIM"

  • dependencies to SDC and modeling

  • non-functional impacts

  • support for YANG, Heat, TOSCA

Quickly identify scope, consider: documentation, APIs, models, testing, integration, functionality.

-          Note of any particular deliverables to highlight.

-          If anything is out of scope, not it down

Other:

-          Identify baseline code (if any)

Project 2: Multi-VIM

Project Name: Multi-VIM

-          Provide a brief project name.

Project Description

  • Support for multiple VIMs

  • testing

-          Provide a high level description of the project

Scope:

  • Common interface for multiple VIMs

  • testing

-          Quickly identify scope, consider: documentation, APIs, models, testing, integration, functionality.

-          Note of any particular deliverables to highlight.

-          If anything is out of scope, not it down

Other:

-          Identify baseline code (if any)