2019-09-04 Control Loop Sub Committee Weekly Meeting

Owned by Pamela Dragosh
Last updated: Sept 04, 2019
2 min read

Discussion items 

Duration

Agenda Item

Requested by

Notes / Links

Duration

Agenda Item

Requested by

Notes / Links

START RECORDING



Frankfurt Release Requirement

@Pamela Dragosh





Open questions to DCAE team from Ericsson regarding "how" uS are configured to collect VES for specific components defined for the service. (Not sure I worded this correctly)

Require @Vijay Kumar to help clarify

@Michela Bevilacqua

@Liam Fallon





Discussion on the type of spec CDS needs to create for CLAMP to use: OPEN-API or grpc specification: Yuriy Malakov

@Rushmep





Questions for PNF Control Loop use case

@Liam Fallon



ATTENDEES

NOTES

  • Invite @David McBrideto next weeks meeting to help understand requirements tracking and how to use JIRA's to help automate the task and help PTL's put together user stories with estimations.

  • @Yuriy Malakov  and @Gervais-Martial Ngueko CDS/CLAMP discussion: 2 options for integration of CDS actions to CLAMP

    • CSAR → extract CBA → spec folder contains the spec for the entire package, unzip file and then render all the actions

    • Expose OpenAPI or gRPC specification

    • @Yuriy Malakov will provide a CSAR example for clarification

    • CDS team to think about classifications: scope of actions that correlate to VNF, PNF, VM, VFModule

    • @Pamela Dragosh Overall ONAP needs a general solution for coming up with a specification for actors/actions and the targets that are applied to. Suggestion from James Cuddy to have a session in Antwerp regarding this. Pam can add an extra meeting and/or add to G requirements

  • @Liam Fallon  questions

    • Is it possible to create a control loop in SDC and then onboard to CLAMP? When parameterize and deploy CLAMP, can you create another CL?

      • Per @Gervais-Martial Ngueko- yes

      • Liam could not figure it out in GUI

    • Does CLAMP have a REST interface for deploy?

      • Martial has a backend API but does not expose it yet. There is a swagger

    • Liam: example is that they want to define the CL's up front, but want to defer to the deployment later in an automated session. Would like a REST interface for that. REST is there, just not exposed.

    • If define a new uS with new parameters and new blueprint, CLAMP will adapt to that blueprint? Yes CLAMP will adapt to it.

    • If there is a case of 2 uS where 1 uS may affect the configuration of another uS possible? Martial - not supported. Hard to model that.



RECORDING

zoom_0.mp4