2018-10-25 AAI Developers Meeting
- Former user (Deleted)
- Venkata Harish Kajur
Attendees
- I am sorry I didn't catch all the names present at the meeting, feel free to add yourself if you want, thank you
Recording
2018-10-25_AAI_Developers_Meeting.mp4
Agenda Items
| Title | Responsible | Status | Notes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weekly Developer's Call | DONE | James Forsyth will create a new poll and send link to new poll to the onap-discuss list https://doodle.com/poll/t2c7md2kv9x7cdzx | |||||||||||
| Dublin 5G Use Case | IN PROGRESS | Dublin AAI changes in support of 5g use cases. Link for presentation: 5G - PNF Plug and Play (Casablanca carry-over items)
| |||||||||||
| Schema Service | IN PROGRESS | Discuss about the Schema Microservice 11th Oct: Use Cases for Dynamic AAI Schema Changes | |||||||||||
| Jackson Replacement | IN PROGRESS | Security subcommittee has recommended teams move away from jackson, and will be presenting alternatives and asking for an assessment from each project. Our team will need to do an analysis - this would not be trivial, especially given how many of our repos are impacted. As of now, this would be a very high LOE for the team, we need to understand what the recommendation from the SECCOM is before we can provide better details on what the LOE would be. Updated: Using Google gson vs FasterXML Jackson 10th Oct: Present to Seccom meeting 15th Oct: Present to PTL meeting | |||||||||||
| Disable unused web services | OPEN | Could we disable unused (i.e. not integrated) A&AI web services, so that the deployment is faster and the resource footprint is smaller? e.g. Champ (any other ws?) | |||||||||||
| AAI HAProxy and 2-way-TLS | Former user (Deleted) | OPEN | Technical solution to either decommission the proxy or make design changes to AAF to enable client side certificates. | ||||||||||
| AAI Traversal queries | Former user (Deleted) | OPEN | The AAI Traversal API is fairly complex, are there examples and descriptions of what the inputs and outputs of the rest api are, or alternative way to gain know-how? Code is quite difficult to read. | ||||||||||
| AAI Champ | Former user (Deleted) | OPEN |
| ||||||||||
| Spring profiles | Former user (Deleted) | OPEN | Do we need the “production” profile? | ||||||||||
| OOM Artifacts | Former user (Deleted) | OPEN | Some of our top level OOM deployment artifacts are not unique (i.e. don’t take namespace into account as all other deployables), is that intentional? | ||||||||||
| New column | Former user (Deleted) | DONE | Proposing new column Status, where: OPEN - topic not yet discussed IN PROGRESS - being worked on ON HOLD - not being worked on and not finished DONE - topic finished, can be closed and removed Keong: The "status" mirrors a JIRA case workflow. Should we open JIRA cases to track progress and link them here? They can also be linked/searched from the Meeting Notes pages. Keong: Also just to use up the available colours from Confluence macro, suggest:
Pavel: Keong Lim - I think some agenda items don't justify opening and managing a JIRA ticket, but if the agenda item leads to a real task that someone should perform then we definately should create a JIRA for that. The "Cancelled" status is a marvelous idea! | ||||||||||
| Return codes and messages for WS | OPEN | Is there a guide for the description of the error message and the error codes? How are new error states (message + code) added? | |||||||||||
| Rocket.Chat support | OPEN | In order to use rocket chat with native client (and have notifications for example) it needs a TLS cert. Support for integration team? | |||||||||||
| Support for 2 OOM deployment types | OPEN | Motivation: Decrease the resource footprint for A&AI (ONAP) deployments Idea: we could support 2 different deployments 1. full (normal) deployment and 2. barebones deployment. The point of the "barebone" deployment would be to deploy only the essential services necessary for proper functioning of A&AI (leaving out services like cacher, sparky, graphadmin, having 1 cassandra node instead of 3 or 5 etc). In order to reduce hardware/cloud costs (mainly the memory footprint) it could be beneficial to support a minimalistic A&AI deployment. |