ONAP R4 Resource IM Call 2019-5-6

Owned by Xu Yang
Last updated: May 07, 2019
1 min read

General Information:

  • Date and Time: 2019, May 6th, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern

  • Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535

  • Meeting Recording: 

  • Meeting Chat Log: 

Agenda:

  • Agenda review

  • Feedback to ETSI

  • Party proposal

Material:

Minutes:

  • Feedback to ETSI

    • haven't done the feedback yet

    • the comments received are marked in red

    • ask for agreement on Tuesday about whether to take these feedback to ETSI, and if permitted, Thinh will provide a contribution back to ETSI

  • Party proposal

    • leftover questions:

      • 1) do we 100% follow TMF? A: No. Would deviate if needed.

      • 2) do we want more detailed proposal?

        • Kevin's plan is to have a skeleton first and fill in the contents where necessary.

    • Further comments:

      • There's a comment on the wiki questioning the use case of having the model of vendors.

        • There's code using these concepts (but maybe not actually used), the purpose is to give some visibility. Example: license.

      • use case's relationship with models

        • model without use case seems useless

        • having model discussion first could help understand the use case

        • the models takes time to be mature, so maybe it's better to have model discussions first or at the same time as the use case

        • need motivation for creating the models, it's hard to review the model without understanding the use case

        • question: what's the relationship/process between use case and model work?

          • should we ask use case subcommittee to review the models after the models are proposed?

          • should we ask use case subcommittee to document the related use cases (e.g., license) before making the models?

          • should we do the use case and models in parallel? how?