ONAP R4 Resource IM Call 2019-6-24

General Information:

Agenda:

  • PNF software version proposal update

  • AAI reverse engineering discussion

Material:

Minutes:

  • PNF software version proposal update

    • the detailed proposal has been updated on page ONAP R6+ Onboarding VNF/PNF package format, non-MANO artifacts set definition

      • options for file directories:

        • option 1: a single directory containing all ONAP non-MANO artifacts (i.e., files)

        • option 2: each category of ONAP non-MANO artifacts may have one dedicate directory

        • maybe option 2 is preferred

      • file name needs feedback

      • what would be like if a package including both MANO and non-MANO artifacts

      • CSAR structure

        • currently only support option 1, not precluding option 2 in the future

      • security aspectes

        • VNFSDK has done some implementations, some are left for Frankfurt release, may need further check

    • ONAP hasn't fully established the registration process with ETSI (ETSI ask to provide more examples to show how to use the registry/artifacts)

      • Andrei/Michela are working on it

    • Andrei suggest to keep track of updates to the non-MANO artifacts

      • wiki pages are created per release now

    • Next step:

      • try to finalize the open questions this week

      • ask for a poll (if the proposal is ready) on next week's modeling subcommittee call

  • AAI reverse engineering discussion

    • problems: AAI has a large data model, not sure which part are common to be put into IM

    • AAI data model visualization results:

    • Jacquiline's view: point to AAI's UML model, IM team working on part of the model which are considered as "common"( ? )

      • AAI can update their own model simultaneously

      • figure out the common model is not feasible

    • Keong: AAI's data model is designed to be shared, though which projects are using the model isn't documented well; track DMaaP events/AAI logs could be helpful

    • Andy: analysis of APIs would be helpful

    • Questions:

      • could we make the assumption AAI provides a common model for the runtime?

        • seems yes

        • IM may help provide mappings between AAI model and standards

    • Keong and Jacquiline would help give presentations on the tools and results of AAI reverse engineering next week