Modeling Subcommittee 2022-05-30
- guochuyi
Meeting time: 13:00 UTC, 21:00 Beijing Time, 09:00 US Eastern
Zoom Meeting Link: https://zoom.us/j/96707970467?pwd=czBOK01ET3kxU3BuT2RKRTdHMVNNUT09
International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/aeukmDubIO
May 30, 2022 | Recordings |
|---|
Agenda Item | Requested by | Notes / Links |
|---|---|---|
START RECORDING: | ||
Agenda Bashing | @Xu Yang @guochuyi | Co-Chair 50 mins - New R11 Modeling Requirements for General Intent model @Keguang He ASD model mins ETSI CNF support mins Reverse engineering mins Topology model mins Modeling Documentation mins |
Co-chair | @Xu Yang @guochuyi | - Modeling current activity status Provide the dash board of current status and how to involve: See: Modeling Current Activity Status Please keep updated Please capture modeling requirements for R11 here: ONAP R11 Modeling High Level Requirements Proposed Kohn Release Schedule: Release Planning: Kohn M1: 5.26 Propose your modeling requirements for K release! - General Intent model introduction @Keguang He 1）Chuanyu: Do we have context definition in the model ? →Keguang: Context includes the information for different expectation intention, this release doesn't include it, need further research for next releases. 2) Chuanyu: 1 IntentExpectation has multiple TargetIds instead of 1? → Keguang: Better to have 1, targetId can be an id of an instance. 3) Chuanyu: IsStatisfied should be corresponded to 1 target? → Keguang: IsStatisfied is used to show whether the requirements are satisfied or not. Need more discussion about this, and provide examples. 4) Xu: What is the relationship of 3 models(see the following picture) and the plan for them? → Keguang: common model is domain-independent, while extension model is domain-specific, this release only includes common model in ONAP Modeling Subcommittee. Xu: Does this model refers to any specific use case, like E2E Network Slicing? Lingli: No.  5) Xu: In the use case description, the intent model can be used for provisioning, scaling and others, then what is difference with policy which is also a way to do? k8s seems to be different way of intent，maybe see k8s APIs to study how they model intent. Conclusion and AP: Create the wiki page for general intent model and share the slides today. It needs more explanation of the use case, bring an example next time for helping to build and explain the model. Note: In JIRA, ONAPMODEL is the "project" we are using to capture Modeling Subcommittee release requirements. - LFN Developer & Testing Forum in June https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65537697 Kenny: the event is expected to be joined F2F and presented locally (F2F), at least someone of the session needed to be in the room, and can set up the bridge there, and allow remote participation; a video streaming is the backup plan Chuyi: plan to propose a multi-SDO workshop on network intelligence topic, target participants including ETSI, 3GPP, TMF delegates Kenny: on-site health and safety requirements - https://events.linuxfoundation.org/lfn-developer-testing-forum/attend/health-and-safety/ Fred: Plan to have a topic for CNF - ONAP Model Governance Update Proposed Updates to ONAP Model Governance |
ETSI CNF support | @Fernando Oliveira | R9 DM proposal: https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16463007 ongoing work on alignment IFA011 v4.3.1 |
ASD model | @Marian Darula | 1）Plan for the PoC: Application Package Onboarding to SDC 2）IM: Application Service Descriptor (ASD) onboarding IM 3）DM: Application Service Descriptor (ASD) Resource Data Model 4）ASD in NSD: NSD requirements for ASD deployment 5）Packaging proposal: Application Service Descriptor (ASD) Onboarding Packaging Format Comments (potential IM v2): |
Reverse engineering | @Jacqueline Beaulac [Ericsson] | |
Topology model | https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposed+Topology+IM+Sketch | |
Modeling Documentation | @Xu Yang | |
ACTION ITEMS: