2022-03-08 Security Subcommittee Meeting Notes
Please find below the Minutes of Meetings and recording for the SECCOM meeting that was held on 8th of March 2022.
Jira No | Summary | Description | Status | Solution |
---|---|---|---|---|
| Synch with ONAP documentation - Thomas | Release Notes organization: Log4j vulnerabilities in direct dependencies were removed from A&AI, DMAAP, SDNC and VNFSDK. Log4j vulnerabilities introduced by transitive dependencies are still in A&AI, CCSDK, DCAE, DMAAP, MULTICLOUD, SDNC, SO, VNFSDK. https://docs.onap.org/en/latest/release/index.html#istanbul-maintenance-release-9-0-1
Projects/functional repos with transitive dependencies for log4j:
| ongoing | Tickets to be open by Pawel for remaining transitive dependencies on per relevant project basis:
|
| Security Logging Presentation to Akraino TSC - Bob | Logging today at 1500 UTC. Here is the meeting info if you would like to join. https://wiki.akraino.org/display/AK/TSC+2022-03-08+%28Tuesday%29+7%3A00+am+Pacific | ongoing |
|
| ONAP Security Review Questionnaire template first cut – Tony | https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/ONAP+Security+Reviews We want to start simple and small. Time it takes to document vulnerabilities and time it takes to resolve it. Assurance section might be expanded. | ongoing | SECCOM members to review proposed draft and further discuss next week. |
| Packages upgrades for Jakarta | As of today the project teams have upgraded 103 of 299 identified vulnerable direct dependencies for the release (~34%). |
| Ask TSC to have focus on security by sending an e-mail to TSC and discuss this issue on Thursday. |
| Time shift in US on 13th March and in EU on 27th March. | Please check if the meeting invitations are displayed accordingly. |
|
|
| Quality gates | No update. Meeting with Seshu to be done. |
|
|
| Issue with Wiki creation by Tony | Ticket to be created to solve the issue |
| Ticket to be created to solve the issue |
|
|
|
|
|
| SECCOM MEETING CALL WILL BE HELD ON 15th OF MARCH'22. | Quality gates for code quality improvements - continuation of the discussion. 5Y review criteria.
|
|
|
Recording:
SECCOM presentation: