ONAP R6 Resource IM Call 2020-6-8

• Date and Time: 2020, June 8th, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern

• Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/97595070639

• Meeting Recording:  zoom_0.mp4

• Meeting Chat Log: meeting_saved_chat.txt

Agenda:

• Agenda bashing - 5 minutes

• Modeling Process discussion - 5 minutes

• Model Proposals - 30 minutes
  
  

  • allotted resource - 0 minutes

  • ETSI alignment - 0 minutes

  • 5G RAN service - 0 minutes

  • CNF - 0 minutes

  • Geolocation - 0 minutes

  • PNF instance model - 0 minutes

• Modeling Documentation & Glossary- 10 minutes

• Allotted Resource Revised

• Allotted Resource Model Review Comments

• Allotted Resource for Network Slicing

• 5G RAN SERVICE MODELING & DEFINITION in R6 Frankfurt

• Proposed ONAP Release Process Updates for Information and Data Modeling

• ONAP R7 Modeling High Level Requirements

• Agenda bashing

• Model Proposals
  
  

  • geolocation model:

    • start with the "place" class in the root model

    • discussions have been taken to identify the attributes

    • referenced TMF GB922 place model

    • Andy: suggest to provide information as required by the information element template (see the last bullet for the template)

    • next step: create UML class objects

• Modeling Documentation

  • R6 readthedocs review: https://onap-doc.readthedocs.io/projects/onap-modeling-modelspec/en/latest/index.html

  • add relationship documentation to the UML guideline: ONAPMODEL-28: Using the Documentation Property for RelationshipsOpen

    • discuss next week

• Modeling Process

  • Ben is working on the working process for the use case team, finished M2, start M3 part

  • continue the discussion from the Benefit part

    • add integration and standardization

  • add "information element template" bullet to the M0 process

    • Generic Information Element Template

    • the template has referenced things from the use case template

    • Q: is the information element (mentioned in the template) expected to be a UML class? A: hopefully, but there is no constraints

  • Model WoW and Interaction Chart (process diagram update)

  • next step:

    • present in the next DDF

    • final review and adoption? cross-check with use case and arc teams?