Use Case Realization Call: September 18, 2019
- Benjamin Cheung
Date
Sep 18, 2019
Attendees
@Benjamin Cheung
@Fari Behi
@ittay
@Vimal Begwani
Seshu
huang Cheng
@Gerard Hynes
@Joanne Liu Rudel
@Scott Blandford
@Zu Qiang
@Prabhu
@Oskar Malm
@James Forsyth
@Swaminathan Seetharaman
Melanie Sater
DISCUSSION ITEMS LOG
Ctgry | Item | Who | Notes |
Pltfm
| PLATFORM TOPICS: Controller to NF Association | @Benjamin Cheung | R5/R6 Topic See Slides Nov 6, 2018. Development of Controller to NF assignment association S/W. CDS, VF-C, APP-C, SDN-R, SDN-C; will the CCSDK "merging" of controllers happen in R6? |
Pltfm | PLATFORM TOPICS: Data Persistency, RunTime DB | @N.K. Shankaranarayanan @Joanne Liu Rudel @Benjamin Cheung | STATUS: Work for RunTime DB completed, not merged in R4 Dan Timoney moved to R5, one Jira for RunTime DB. One issue about merging. ONAP code added can take a test ONAP deployment to have the ConfigDB work. USE CASE REALIZATION MEETING (Notes 2019-01-30) U/C Cross-Interaction, Persistency |
Pltfm | PLATFORM TOPICS: Controller LCM API Evolution | @Oskar Malm | Goals (Architecture Evolution)
Present at the Arch S/C Apr 9 (Tue) second presentation. |
Use Cases | USE CASE/5G: RAN (ORAN-3GPP) Standards harmonization with ONAP | @marge.hillis @Vimal Begwani @fred feisullin |
Use Case WIKI: MOBILITY STANDARDS HARMONIZATION WITH ONAP |
Use Cases | USE CASE/5G: Licensing Management | @Timo Perala @Samuli Kuusela | New U/C added to the 5G Use Cases for Licensing Management Use case Wiki: LICENSING MANAGEMENT |
Use Cases | USE CASE/5G: OOF / SON | @N.K. Shankaranarayanan | PoC U/C will happen in WinLab. To meet time lines do those parts in Windriver focusing on DCAE, Policy and OOF. Jira SDN-C (Dan Timoney) pushed El Alto (the Maintenance Release). |
Use Cases | USE CASES: BBS U/C Evolution | @David Perez Caparros @Tim Carey @Chaker Al-Hakim | BBS Evolution - Slide set linked in R6 proposed U/C. List of proposals & functional requirements.
|
Use Cases | USE CASES/5G: PM Dictionary/FM MD GUI | @marge.hillis | |
Use Cases | USE CASES/5G: PNF S/W Upgrade | @Zu Qiang @wangyaoguang | |
Use Cases | USE CASES/5G: Preonboarding/Onboarding | @Benjamin Cheung @Zu Qiang @Michela Bevilacqua | |
Use Cases | USE CASES: IoT Service Creation | @Atul Purohit | IoT Create Services on 5G June 19, 2019 |
Use Cases | USE CASES: Modeling gNB/5G RAN | @Thinh Nguyenphu (Unlicensed) @Benjamin Cheung Melanie Sater @Tracy Van Brakle @Martin Skorupski | Align, harmonize, reconcile various information models to ONAP model: Expand & verify model and harmonize with the ONAP internal information & data model: ETSI SOL001 ... 007 with ONAP internal Model PNFD modeling (Model S/C) 5G Model (3GPP, RAN) ORAN (WGs, RAN) Open ROADM (reconfig optical add/drop multiplexer, Optical) ONF (Optical) ISOMII (Optical) OTCC (Optical transport config & control) - Use Cases that need transport models need some model consistency. - Try a Use Case with extended ONAP model & real equipment. |
Use Cases | 5G NRM (Network Resource Model) Configuration | @wangyaoguang | Presented at the 2019 June LFN DDF, titled as '5G Provisioning management service to NRM' Presentation scheduled for Aug 8, 2019 |
Arch | Architecture S/C PNF POB/OB Flow | @Benjamin Cheung | Arch S/C Information Flows: New Information flow for Preonboarding/Onboarding xNF packages/resources. |
Pltfm | A&AI | @James Forsyth | A&AI updates |
TSC | TSC: PoC Definition | @Benjamin Cheung @Alla.Goldner | |
TSC | TSC/USE CASES: Test Automation Progress | @Benjamin Cheung @Alla.Goldner | Use Case Test Automation Action Items: Use case subcommittee to reach the Dublin use case owner to provide the following information. what's the current percentage of testing automation regarding your use case and functional requirements; what will be the plan to be 100% and constraints (resources availability etc.) |
| R6 Frankfurt / M0 |
| Need the U/C teams to fill out the Dev. Impacts. More Generalized Use Case Template (discussed w/ Model team): |
| VID: Service Models Browser Orchestration | @James Forsyth @Former user (Deleted) | VID: Service Models browser - display orchestration type (macro / a`la carte) use-case. This use-case requires us to extend the AAI data-model, with an additional field, related to Service Model. This field will be used later on to indicate in VID the Service Model orchestration type. A&AI Epic 2594 AAI-2594: AAI: Store orchestration-type parameter as part of model-ver:objectClosed |
|
|
|
|
VID IMPACTING USE CASES
USE CASE | IMPACTS |
|---|---|
PNF / Preonboarding Onboarding | No Impact |
PNF / Plug and Play | Migration of existing PNF PnP sub-workflows to a new BB approach (probably we will be creating 4-5 new BBs). VID Impact: Within “old” VID macro orchestration pages, a special field to provide a pnf-id parameter (shall be actually called “correlationID” or “PNF correlationID”) has been displayed under the following conditions:
When we migrate to BB approach, we`d keep the possibility to provide this parameter to the SO API call as input. How this will change with SO/BB approach, and with new VID GUI targeted at macro (GR) flows – we`d see exactly, after we execute some tests with VID. We`d have to check, what capabilities and conditions could be applied to display and process this “PNF Correlation ID parameter”. Can the same BBs could be re-used in “standard” vCPE use-case. We`re looking at a generic solution, and we`d probably display this additional field, when we figure out, that there is a PNF resource used in a Service Model. SUMMARY: Can Commit. Nokia will be helping to developing. |
PNF / Software Upgrade | VID Trigger PNF S/W upgrade workflow, providing corresponding parameter values Zu has already captured change and needed in ONAP, some features to develop VID to allow input from user to instantiate S/W upgrade of PNFs. Changes and specific to these U/C. VID-505: update VID GUI to support PNF software upgradeClosed SUMMARY: VID can Commit. Question - is Ericsson willing to provide development & efforts. Yes Ericsson will be involved in development. |
PNF / Configuration with NetConf | No Impact. The U/C will be updated based on changed in PnP not additional VID impact. |
5G / 5G Service Modeling | No Impact |
5G / Bulk PM | No Impact, no VID impacted based on the R6 current proposal |
5G / PM Dictionary | Will Generic Artifact Browser (existing SDC design studio, GAB) be available in VID? Run Time Usage. SUMMARY: Let's have offline discussion with Damian to answer question. @Former user (Deleted) |
5G / FM Meta Data | Will Generic Artifact Browser (SDC design studio, GAB) be available in VID? SUMMARY: (discuss) |
5G / OOF SON (PCI) | Display VID updates to support extensions Not listed in Wiki, need to discuss w/ Ittay. Onboarding SON functionality - Looking at feasibility of existing life cycle of U/C. SON mS triggered by RAN for Config. changes; onboarding to DCAE manually can this SON handler be designed by SDC and then SONaaS automated. No commitment for R6. If this is so, then there might be impact to VID. If designed by VID then modeling CLAMP. NEW Cell Assignment - SON U/C cells are existing already configured; new CELL addition; ONAP may want to assigned PCI to new cell; PCI Assignment; if VID is involved. QUESTION: is Swami committed, will this work be committed? SUMMARY: Might be changes, still designing the U/C. U/C commitment. Probably in Oct. will have more clarity. |
5G / E2E Network Slicing | how will slice be instantiated? SO (Seshu) you will require - using svc order API; reach SO through API/external API OSS-BSS client; if you want this external API would be VID change. otherwise need externalAPI w/ OSS-BSS client. How would demonstrate/demo the test? Having VID is probably better choice. From VID perspective ; otherwise new Client SUMMARY: To demo the Network Slice U/C in R6 would want to invoke via VID. POTENTIAL IMPACT. INVESTIGATE. |
5G / RAN ORAN 3GPP Standards Harmonization | No Impact |
5G / Runtime DB | Display of RunTime DB information; Design Time view of Run Time DB info. No Impact. |
5G / NRM CM w/ RESTful HTTPS | No Impact ??? |
5G / Licensing Management | No Impact |
SERVICE RESOLVER | no direct impact; depends on the CFS part - SO handles CFS & RFS there may be VID impact. VId will interact w/ Policy (in the future) SUMMARY: Potential Impact. Still investigation. |
SCALING | Listed as Impact on R6 Release Page But No impact stated on Wiki. With scaling, Ittay & Scott has discussed. For R6 probably no impact. Multiple instances (nice to have in R6) but might be a very large change in VID. Does help many providers. SUMMARY: Listed as a stretch goal for R6; if not put on road-map for a future release. |
Mobile Service Chaining & Service Selection | No Impact ??? |
BBS | No Impact (confirmed) |
CCVPN | No Impact (confirmed) |
Control Loop | No Impact (confirmed) |
Multi Domain Optical Service L0/L1 Orchestration | No Impact ??? |
CHANGE MANAGEMENT | IMPACT (but not described), None Listed but eMail response said potential @Chris Rapposelli-Manzo SUMMARY: Investigate Further. |
HPA | No Impact ??? |
RUN TIME SECURITY | No Impact ??? |
K8S Based Cloud Region Support | No Impact ??? |
DAaaS | GUI/CLI based configuration of stack ?? (will this be VID change??) SUMMARY: Investigate |
3rd Party Operational Domain Manager | IMPACT (but not described) SUMMARY: Ittay will follow-up w/ Nishi. |
KEY PRESENTATIONS & OVERVIEWS & RECORDINGS
DATE | TOPIC | PRESENTER | DESCRIPTION |
Apr 10, 2019 | Controller LCM API Evolution | @Oskar Malm |
|
May 1, 2019 | A&AI GraphGraph Visualizer | @Former user (Deleted) | Visualizer for A&AI Model Layout |
May 8, 2019 | A&AI Model Browser, Sparky | @James Forsyth | A&AI developer Model Browser to navigate and viewing attributes, object types & edge view Recording & Slides: Use Case Realization Call: May 8, 2019 |
May 15, 2019 | A&AI Run Time Browser (Sparky) | @Giulio Graziani | A&AI Run-Time Browser |
May 22, 2019 | Edge Automation Overview & Discussion | @Ramki Krishnan | Central & Distributed Edge ONAP configuration. Topics include: Onboarding, Instantiation, Edge Orchestration, A&AI, Architecture, Work-flows, Multi-Tenancy |
May 29, 2019 | Modeling S/C , Use Case Project Teams, Architecture S/C Way of Working | @Benjamin Cheung | Model S/C (Sub committee) contributions page: |
Jun 5, 2019 | Use Case slides for Dev. Forum | @Benjamin Cheung | |
July 10, 2019 | R6: PNF Software Upgrade Overview & Discussion | @Zu Qiang @Ulas Kozak @wangyaoguang | ONAP Read the Docs/R4 Announcements |
July 24, 2019 | R6: OOF/SON PCI Use Case Demo, Overview & Discussion | @N.K. Shankaranarayanan | OOF / PCI / SON Use Case |
Aug 7, 2019 | 5G NRM (Network Resource Model) Configuration U/C Overview | @wangyaoguang | 5G NRM (Network Resource Model) Configuration U/C |
Aug 14, 2019 | ORAN Standards Harmonization U/C Overview | @marge.hillis @Vimal Begwani | ORAN Standards Harmonization U/C |
Aug 21, 2019 | Modeling Sub-Committee guidelines & Use Case Interactions | @Andy Mayer @Hui Deng | Modeling S/C Process Wiki: Proposed ONAP Release Process Updates for Information and Data Modeling Use Case Tracking Template and Use Case Template R6 Modeling High Level Requirements Planning Page: ONAP R6 Modeling High Level Requirements |
Sept 4, 2019 | Licensing Management Overview | @Timo Perala @Samuli Kuusela | Introduction of Licensing Management in R6 |
Sept 11, 2019 | SDC & R6 Use Case Impacts Discussion | @Ofir Sonsino | Discussion with SDC PTL Ofir w/ the Use Case Teams and SDC commitments. See the summary Table for SDC impacting Use Cases. |
Sept 18, 2019 | VID & R6 U/C Discuss Preparation for Technical Conference Antwerp | @ittay Use Case Teams | Discussion with VID PTL (Ittay Stern) for R6 Use Case Impacts discussion and commitments for VID impacting Use Cases Preparing slides for Use Cases at the Technical Conference Antwerp (for 5G/PNF use cases) |
Sept 25, 2019 | A&AI & R6 Use Case Impacts Discussion | @James Forsyth | Discussion with A&AI PTL (Jimmy Forsyth) and Chandra Cinthala for R6 A&AI Use Case Impacts discussion and commitments. |
Oct 2, 2019 | DCAE & R6 Use Case Impacts Discussion | @Vijay Kumar | Discussion with DCAE PTL (Vijay Kumar) for R6 Use Case Impacts discussion and commitments for DCAE impacting Use Cases |
Oct 9, 2019 | M1 U/C discussion | Use Case Teams | M1 Deadline (Oct 10 2019) |
x, 2019 | SO & R6 Use Case Impacts Discussion | @Seshu Kumar Mudiganti | Discussion with SO PTL (Seshu Kumar) for R6 Use Case Impacts discussion and commitments. |
x, 2019 | Release Manager Discussion | @David McBride | Discussion with David McBride of the Linux Foundation, the R6 Release Manager regarding practices, wiki page updates, Jira dashboard and what is a use case? |
x, 2019 | RunTime DB Discussion | @Joanne Liu Rudel @Benjamin Cheung | Discussion of the RunTime DB Use Case in R6 Frankfurt which introduces a Common Service Data Layer for a data lake to store configuration and operational parameters. |
|
|
|
|
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Document | File |
|---|---|
Use Case Impacts Spreadsheet |  |
5G / PNF Use Cases in R6 Frankfurt for the Antwerp Conference Sept 26-27 |  |
|
|
RECORDING
Recording | FILE |
|---|---|
Zoom Video & Audio (MP4) |  |
Audio Only (M4A) | |
Playback (M3U) |  |
Chat (Txt) |
|