EUAG Survey
This document is a first step in soliciting input from the LFN End User Advisory Group (EUAG). It is meant to identify common concerns of EUAG members as well as encourage group members to channel their feedback to the use case subcommittee and TSC.
Latest version:
v.1 Initial draft
Feel free to suggest modifications/additions in the comments section of this wiki page.
October 4th 2018 - Second revision of the survey, based on community feedback.
Highlight of changes - Removed "modularity" from scoring table and added it as a separate topic. Added extensibility to table, Added multiple choice for modularity, added question regarding vendor incentive.
October 9th 2019 - Third revision
Added containerized VNFs question
Comments
It may be worth adding another line as follows under “Please choose which best describes your company’s strategic approach to ONAP”
We are committed to leverage some components of ONAP for our network service. We are currently making some progress towards this.
End User Advisory Group (EUAG) in LFN was conceived to address pain points for Service Providers to define user stories they like to see taken up in community under different LFN Projects. If that's the intent Company in this survey I assume will be Service Provider. It would be fair to add a question to the SPs what do they offer as incentive to enable build strong and diverse suppliers in participating to make ONAP better in the long run.
My comment is regarding the definition of “Modularity” in your survey. We spent significant amount of time at the architecture tiger team meeting (Oct, 02, 2018) debating the definition. You may want to wait for Stephen T., Parviz and other members to weigh in before you send the survey out.