Control Loop Policy Types Proposal #2: Use a common base Policy Type
This design proposal is to use a common base Policy Type with a common header for all possible Control Loop Policy Types. In doing so, we gain the following benefits:
Organization: All policies for a control loop can be organized more easily because the field that uniquely identifies the Control Loop is in a common place where CLAMP can easily find and set.
Problem #1 solved: All the current policy types have a different field name for the unique identity of the Control Loop
Problem #2 solved: All the current policy types locate that field in a different hierarchy within each policy type.
Extendability: Future Control Loop policy types can be designed without hard coding into CLAMP where to find the unique id for the control loop
1.0 Base Control Loop Policy Type
ALL Control Loop Policy Types derive from this so that CLAMP as well as auditing/monitoring tools can organize/find all the policies associated with a Control Loop.
ISSUE #1: Should this be a list??
Base Control Loop Datatype for ALL Control Loop Policy Types
tosca_definitions_version: tosca_simple_yaml_1_0_0
policy_types:
onap.policies.controlloop.Common:
derived_from: tosca.policies.Root
version: 1.0.0
description: |
Base policy type that is shared by all Control Loop Policy Types. Helps to organize all the
policies for a Control Loop and ensure they are tied together by a common ID. Helps toward
alleviating too much external knowledge required to ensure the fields contained in different
types of Policies are consistent with each other.
properties:
id:
type: String
description: The unique control loop id.
required: true
domain:
description: Identifies the domain for the Control Loop. Virtual vs Physical
required: true
type: TBD
eventPublished:
description: |
Describes the event that is published when the application detects the ONSET of
a Control Loop condition. For example, VES vs ControlLoopEvent
required: true
type: TBD
topics:
description: List of Dmaap topics that will be used by the ONAP components to communicate.
required: true
type: TBD
2.0 Example Usages of Base Control Loop Policy Type
The following shows how the base Control Loop Policy Type can be used.
2.1 How current Policy Types would derive from Base Control Loop Policy Type
As of Dublin/El Alto, we have these Policy Types that will need to derive from the base type.
CLAMP will be able to search for Monitoring Policy Types to associate with DCAE uS
CLAMP will be able to search for all possible guard and operational Policy Types
Base Control Loop Policy Types
onap.policies.controlloop.common.Monitoring:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.Common
version: 1.0.0
description: |
Common Control Loop Policy Type for all Monitoring Policy Types. This will contain
shared properties that all DCAE Monitoring applications should define.
properties:
onap.policies.controlloop.common.monitoring.Threshold:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.common.Monitoring
version: 1.0.0
description: Threshold Monitoring Policy Type
properties:
onap.policies.controlloop.common.monitoring.Collectors:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.common.Monitoring
version: 1.0.0
description: Base Collectors Policy Type
properties:
onap.policies.controlloop.common.monitoring.collectors.VES:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.common.monitoring.Collectors
version: 1.0.0
description: VES Collector Policy Type
properties:
onap.policies.controlloop.common.Operational:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.Common
version: 1.0.0
description: Base Control Loop Policy Type for all Operational Policy Types
properties:
timeout:
type: Integer
description: |
Overall timeout for executing all the operations. This timeout should equal or exceed the total
timeout for each operation listed.
required: true
trigger:
type: String
description: Initial operation to execute upon receiving an Onset event message for the Control Loop.
required: true
operations:
type: List
description: List of operations to be performed when Control Loop is triggered.
required: true
entry_schema:
type: onap.datatype.controlloop.Operation
onap.policies.controlloop.common.operational.Apex:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.common.Operational
type_version: 1.0.0
version: 1.0.0
description: Operational policies that can customized for Apex PDP
properties:
onap.policies.controlloop.operational.common.Drools:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.common.Operational
type_version: 1.0.0
version: 1.0.0
description: Operational policies that can be customzed for Drools PDP
properties:
controllerName:
type: String
description: Drools controller properties
required: false
onap.policies.controlloop.common.Guard:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.Common
version: 1.0.0
description: Base Control Loop Policy Type for all Guard Policy Types
properties:
actor:
type: string
description: Specifies the Actor
required: true
operation:
type: string
description: Specified the Operation being performed by the Actor
required: true
time_range:
type: tosca.datatypes.TimeInterval
description: An optional range of time during the day the blacklist is valid for.
required: false
onap.policies.controlloop.common.guard.FrequencyLimiter:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.common.Guard
version: 1.0.0
description: Frequency limiter guard policy
properties:
time_window:
type: scalar-unit.time
description: The time window to count the actions against.
required: true
limit:
type: integer
description: The limit
required: true
constraints:
- greater_than: 0
target:
type: string
description: An optional specific VNF to apply this guard to.
required: false
onap.policies.controlloop.common.guard.Blacklist:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.common.Guard
version: 1.0.0
description: Blacklist guard policy
properties:
blacklist:
type: list
description: List of VNF's
required: true
onap.policies.controlloop.common.guard.MinMax:
derived_from: onap.policies.controlloop.common.Guard
version: 1.0.0
description: Min/Max guard policy
properties:
min_vf_module_instances:
type: integer
required: true
description: The minimum instances of this VF-Module
max_vf_module_instances:
type: integer
required: false
description: The maximum instances of this VF-Module
QUESTION/ISSUE: Should Control Loop Coordination have its own base type? Or is it still a guard?
2.3 Example Policies for Scale Out Use Case
3.0 Benefits:
All other Control Loop Policy Types then derive from this base type
CLAMP is now able to search the CSAR and/or Policy Lifecycle API to find ALL possible Policy Types that derive from "onap.policies.controlloop.Root"
Problem solved: will not have to hard code inside the platform what Policy Types it supports.
Control Loop Designers can find the Control Loop Policy Types they wish to use in their control loop and pick and choose them.
Eg. A specific operational policy for a PDP engine (Drools vs Apex)
Eg. Desired guard policies
When DCAE becomes Model Driven, CLAMP should be able to find the Monitoring Policy Types associated with each DCAE uS
ONAP users can now define their own Control Loop Policy Types
NOTE: They will still have to create applications/controllers