ONAP R4 Resource IM Call 2019-4-29
General Information:
Date and Time: 2019, April 29nd, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535
Meeting Recording:
Meeting Chat Log:
Agenda:
Agenda review
BusinessInteraction proposal review
Feedback to ETSI
Party proposal
Material:
Minutes:
Business Interaction proposal
no additional comments online
ask for poll on Tuesday's subcommittee call
Feedback to ETSI
Xu has given some comments according to last call
Kevin would try to prepare with some material to discuss with ETSI on the elementGroup related classes, if the time is tight, would just give some comments and leave it for further study
Acknowledge the first 2 use cases in the shared IP address slides, Arturo (or Xu) would add it to the comment column after the call
no additional comments
encourage people to review the table and the comments before May 1st, when the feedback would be brought back to ETSI
Party proposal
Q: why there're both party and organization? A: similar concept in TMF.
Q: "organization" seems to be better than "party" (in semantics)
Q: is it related to the BusinessInteraction proposal? A: Yes, would update the BusinessInteraction afterwards (related to agreements, etc.)
Q: is it planned to remove "simple" in the title? A: done online, and would update the text afterwards.
Q: why choose TMF? suggest to add rationale
suggest to simplify the "xxxName" classes (currently only "xxxName" has attributes)
encourage people to review and leave comments
2 raised online:
1) do we 100% follow TMF?
2) do we want more detailed proposal?