AAI R4 M1 Release Planning

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.


Overview

Project Name

Enter the name of the project

Project Name

Enter the name of the project

Target Release Name

Dublin

Project Lifecycle State

Incubation

Participating Company 

AT&T, Amdocs, Orange, Huawei, ZTE, Nokia, IBM, TechMahindra

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

The scope of the Dublin Release of AAI will address CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, as well the approved use cases.

Highest priority will be assigned to support security and platform maturity requirements.  As next highest priority, AAI will support the approved use cases.  Best-effort additional development will continue to support additional features not included in the approved use cases.

Key Scope Items:

Item

Item

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-531

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-1331

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-1340

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-1406

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-1989

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-1998

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2026

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2096

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2097

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2099

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2100

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2102

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2103

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2111



Use Cases

AAI R4 Use Case and Functional Requirements Impacts

Minimum Viable Product

  • A&AI Core: Resources - CRUD REST API endpoints for A&AI inventory resources

  • A&AI Core: Traversal - REST APIs for graph traversals.  Some APIs use the Gremlin Server

  • UI - An ONAP portal application used by operations for visualizing and searching

  • Data Router: Makes decisions about workloads to be dispatched to search and tabular microservces.  Includes logic to recognize and direct requests based on request archetypes.

  • Search - Enable complex searches for sub graphs and functions that need to perform well across deeply nested structures using Elasticsearch.  Used by the UI

  • Champ - Abstraction from underlying graph storage systems that A&AI would interface with.

  • Gizmo - CRUD Rest API endpoint for resources and relationships, delivering atomic interactions with the graph for improved scalability.

  • Enricher - Enables complementing AT&T data with federated data from additional sources

  • Cacher - The Response Caching Microservice (Cacher) is built to deliver multiple mechanisms of making API calls and populating the responses into a JSON datastore. The datastore is an embedded mongodb datastore, that stores cached API responses, which are updated via DMAAP events or can be synced by timed tasks or calls to the force sync endpoint.

  • ESR - External System Registry component

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Stories

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh



Longer term roadmap

Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

Gizmo

Executable. Atomic REST CRUD interface to graph database

A&AI resources

Executable.  REST CRUD interface to graph database

A&AI traversal

Executable.  REST Interface for complex queries

Data router

Executable

ESR

Exectuable

OOM Config

Source code - configuration recommendations for using AAI dockers in the OOM environments

Enricher

Executable - data federation service

Cacher

Executable - caching interface


Sub-Components

Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

Area

Actual Level

Targeted Level for current Release

How, Evidences

Comments

Area

Actual Level

Targeted Level for current Release

How, Evidences

Comments

Performance

1

1



  • 0 -- none

  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured

  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented

Stability

1

1



  • 0 – none

  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions

  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions

  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate

Resiliency

2

2



  • 0 – none

  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)

  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)

  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)

Security

1

2 (Stretch goal)



  • 0 – none

  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage

  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls

  • 3 – CII Gold

Scalability

1

1



  • 0 – no ability to scale

  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling

  • 2 – geographic scaling

  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances

Manageability

1

1



  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour

  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management

Usability

1

1



  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation

  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation



  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

DMaaP

Eventing bus







MSB

Service registry







SDC

AAI Model loader consumes model objects







AAF

Authentication / Authorization









  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

SO

REST API

M3

TBD



APPC

REST API

M3

TBD



POLICY

REST API

M3

TBD



VID

REST API

M3

TBD



SDNC

REST API

M3

TBD



HOLMES

REST API

M3

TBD



VF-C

REST API

M3

TBD



CLI

REST API

M3

TBD



MultiVim

REST API

M3

TBD



SDC

REST API(upload/query images)

M3

TBD



ExtAPI

REST API

M3

TBD



UUI

REST API

M3

TBD



OOF

REST API

M3

TBD



  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

Name

Description

Version

Name

Description

Version

JanusGraph

Open-source, distributed graph database

0.2.2

Ubuntu

Open-source software operating system

16.0.4-LTS

Cassandra

Open-source distributed storage system

3.11

Docker

VM container



SpringBoot

Open-source Microservice application sever

1.5.18 or 2.x

ElasticSearch

Search framework

2.4.1

HAPROXY

microservice front end

1.8

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

  • TESTING AND INTEGRATION PLANS

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

  • GAPS

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identified

Impact

Gaps identified

Impact

To fill out

To fill out

  • KNOWN DEFECTS AND ISSUES

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

  • RISKS

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identified

Mitigation Plan

Contingency Plan

Risk identified

Mitigation Plan

Contingency Plan

To fill out

To fill out

To fill out

  • RESOURCES

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • RELEASE MILESTONE

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • TEAM INTERNAL MILESTONE

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

Date

Project

Deliverable

Date

Project

Deliverable

To fill out

To fill out

To fill out

  • DOCUMENTATION, TRAINING

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).

  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset

  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.

  • Documentation includes items such as:

    • Installation instructions

    • Configuration instructions

    • Developer guide

    • End User guide

    • Admin guide

    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.



Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.