AAI R4 M1 Release Planning
DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS
The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.
Overview
Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
---|---|
Target Release Name | Dublin |
Project Lifecycle State | Incubation |
Participating Company | AT&T, Amdocs, Orange, Huawei, ZTE, Nokia, IBM, TechMahindra |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
The scope of the Dublin Release of AAI will address CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, as well the approved use cases.
Highest priority will be assigned to support security and platform maturity requirements. As next highest priority, AAI will support the approved use cases. Best-effort additional development will continue to support additional features not included in the approved use cases.
Key Scope Items:
Item |
---|
Use Cases
AAI R4 Use Case and Functional Requirements Impacts
Minimum Viable Product
A&AI Core: Resources - CRUD REST API endpoints for A&AI inventory resources
A&AI Core: Traversal - REST APIs for graph traversals. Some APIs use the Gremlin Server
UI - An ONAP portal application used by operations for visualizing and searching
Data Router: Makes decisions about workloads to be dispatched to search and tabular microservces. Includes logic to recognize and direct requests based on request archetypes.
Search - Enable complex searches for sub graphs and functions that need to perform well across deeply nested structures using Elasticsearch. Used by the UI
Champ - Abstraction from underlying graph storage systems that A&AI would interface with.
Gizmo - CRUD Rest API endpoint for resources and relationships, delivering atomic interactions with the graph for improved scalability.
Enricher - Enables complementing AT&T data with federated data from additional sources
Cacher - The Response Caching Microservice (Cacher) is built to deliver multiple mechanisms of making API calls and populating the responses into a JSON datastore. The datastore is an embedded mongodb datastore, that stores cached API responses, which are updated via DMAAP events or can be synced by timed tasks or calls to the force sync endpoint.
ESR - External System Registry component
Functionalities
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.
Epics
Stories
Longer term roadmap
Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.
Release Deliverables
Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.
Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description |
---|---|
Gizmo | Executable. Atomic REST CRUD interface to graph database |
A&AI resources | Executable. REST CRUD interface to graph database |
A&AI traversal | Executable. REST Interface for complex queries |
Data router | Executable |
ESR | Exectuable |
OOM Config | Source code - configuration recommendations for using AAI dockers in the OOM environments |
Enricher | Executable - data federation service |
Cacher | Executable - caching interface |
Sub-Components
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.
Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.
Architecture
High level architecture diagram
At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.
Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.
Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.
Platform Maturity
Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.
Area | Actual Level | Targeted Level for current Release | How, Evidences | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Performance | 1 | 1 |
| |
Stability | 1 | 1 |
| |
Resiliency | 2 | 2 |
| |
Security | 1 | 2 (Stretch goal) |
| |
Scalability | 1 | 1 |
| |
Manageability | 1 | 1 |
| |
Usability | 1 | 1 |
|
API Incoming Dependencies
List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.
Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
DMaaP | Eventing bus | |||
MSB | Service registry | |||
SDC | AAI Model loader consumes model objects | |||
AAF | Authentication / Authorization |
API Outgoing Dependencies
API this project is delivering to other projects.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
SO | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
APPC | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
POLICY | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
VID | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
SDNC | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
HOLMES | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
VF-C | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
CLI | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
MultiVim | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
SDC | REST API(upload/query images) | M3 | TBD | |
ExtAPI | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
UUI | REST API | M3 | TBD | |
OOF | REST API | M3 | TBD |
Third Party Products Dependencies
Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).
Name | Description | Version |
---|---|---|
JanusGraph | Open-source, distributed graph database | 0.2.2 |
Ubuntu | Open-source software operating system | 16.0.4-LTS |
Cassandra | Open-source distributed storage system | 3.11 |
Docker | VM container | |
SpringBoot | Open-source Microservice application sever | 1.5.18 or 2.x |
ElasticSearch | Search framework | 2.4.1 |
HAPROXY | microservice front end | 1.8 |
In case there are specific dependencies (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.
TESTING AND INTEGRATION PLANS
Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.
Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.
GAPS
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
Gaps identified | Impact |
---|---|
To fill out | To fill out |
KNOWN DEFECTS AND ISSUES
Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.
RISKS
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).
Risk identified | Mitigation Plan | Contingency Plan |
---|---|---|
To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
RESOURCES
Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.
RELEASE MILESTONE
The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
TEAM INTERNAL MILESTONE
This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.
It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.
Date | Project | Deliverable |
---|---|---|
To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
DOCUMENTATION, TRAINING
Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
Documentation includes items such as:
Installation instructions
Configuration instructions
Developer guide
End User guide
Admin guide
...
Note
The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.
Other Information
Vendor Neutral
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
Free and Open Source Software
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.