ONAP R6 Resource IM Call 2019-9-23
General Information:
Date and Time: 2019, Sep 16th, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535
Meeting Recording:
Meeting Chat Log:
Agenda:
PNF model requirements for Frankfurt Release
software verion - Fei, 15 minutes
license model proposal - Kevin, 15 minutes
Modeling Process discussion - Ben, 25 minutes
A&AI reverse engineering - 5 minutes
Material:
Minutes:
PNF model requirements for Frankfurt Release
software version
offline discussion with Yaoguang happened last week, agreement reached
propose to call for agreement on the modeling subcommittee call this week/next week
the 5G NRM proposal would align with the non-MANO artifact method
license model proposal
introduce the workflow
licenseInventory is out of scope of ONAP for now, it's under discussion whether to introduce the general functionality
so if the assumption SDC has capabilities to distribute license to licenseInventory
so → controller step needs to be confirmed
introduce the model
license
licenseKeyPools
rooting: LicenseKeyPool and EntitlementPool are subclasses of DesignedEntity; LicenseKeyInstance and EntitlementInstance are subclasses of OperationalEntity
the question is: license is not based on the descriptor provided by the vendor, thus not so appropriate to be a subclass under DesignedEntity (which generally considered as designed by SDC)
not finished due to time limit, TBC
encouraged people to leave comments on the wiki
Modeling Process discussion
M2:
refining information model
model proposals are under discussion state (modeling S/C state), called "discussion information model"
classes and attributes are in experimental state (IISOMI state)
individual proposal could be agreed during M2, and be put into "clean"; doesn't mean the whole model of the release is finalized
A&AI reverse engineering:
progress well, Jacquiline is trying to add IISOMI things to the diagram
plan to share in the following meeting