2022-05-24 Meeting notes
Date
May 24, 2022
Attendees
@N.K. Shankaranarayanan
@Vishal Varvate
@Niranjana Y
@YASHWANTH GANDHAPU
@John Keeney (Ericsson EST)
@Ahila P
Need to add names ..
Agenda
Solution approach for control loop for A1-based action for SON use case.
Notes
Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|
Kohn release reqs | 4/26: Discussed reqs in following table. Will create JIRA as needed after discussion converges. Need to determine feasibility of work for SON-Handler MS and Policy. 5/3: Here are links to the main SON Use case REQ for Kohn release .. CCSDK REQ to cover A1 support in SDNR and also RAN-Sim work (which does not have a JIRA home) It is clear that the SON-Handler MS has to send a modified message for the ANR A1-based message. That will have some minor code impact to SON-Handler. Currently, Policy has two control loops for the SON use case which are both forwarded from Policy to SDNR. As of Jakarta, both were O1-based actions in SDNR. | |
A1 support in SDN-R | 3/30 Good discussion on including A1-based action. @Vishal Varvate is interested in contributing. He will work with @John Keeney (Ericsson EST) .
4/19 Vishal needs info on A1 policy schema for ANR use case. Discussed details. Shankar to follow up. 4/26: Discussed control loop message formats for PCI and ANR and ANR policy schema. They are using same Policy name but different Control-Loop name and different Action. See sample messages in file. Changes to ANR message format and control loop policy has impact on SON-Handler MS and Policy. 5/3 Discussed message format for A1-based action. DMaaP message for ANR based needs to change to send payload aligned with A1 policy. Requirement on SON Handler MS DCAEGEN2-3148: SON Handler MS changes for Kohn releaseClosed | |
Control Loop for A1-based action | Discussed the problem statement using slides above. esp. Option 1 and 2 in slide xx. | |
RAN-Sim | 3/8 Further discussion on including netopeer in RAN-Sim. See slides 2-6 in ppt attached here. 3/30 Vishal presented slides below. We had a good discussion. Option 2 gives a little more flexibility for future use. John said they are willing to help with the A1 termination. 4/19 Discussed change in terminology to avoid confusion. We are not implementing Near-RT RIC and xApp using OSC near-rt-ric. Decision to change terminology to better capture the nature of the RAN-Sim enhancement. Plan is to implement
5/3 RAN App will have code to take an A1 message with (poor) HO KPI for a cell relation, and take action to blacklist that cell relation. |