ONAP R9 Resource IM Call 2021-7-12

• Date and Time: 2021, July 12, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern

• Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/97595070639

• Meeting Recording:  

• Meeting Chat Log:  

Agenda:

• Agenda bashing - 5 minutes

• Model Proposals
  
  

  • ETSI CNF support - ? minutes

  • CNF runtime model - 5 minutes

  • PNF instance model - ? minutes

  • CPS model - 0 minutes

  • Topology model - 0 minutes

• Modeling Documentation - 0 minutes

• Model proposals:
  
  

  • Abstract Topology Model

• Modeling requirements:

  • https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/ONAP+R9+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements

• Related information:

  • Allotted Resource for Network Slicing

  • R8 5G Service Modeling

• Clean/Approved models:

  • ONAP Information Model - Clean and approved models across ONAP releases

• Model Specification:

  • Honolulu release: https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-modeling-modelspec/en/honolulu/ONAP%20Model%20Spec/im/index.html

• Agenda bashing

• Model Proposals
  
  

  • ETSI support for CNF model

    • R9 DM proposal: https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16463007

      • aligned with SOL001 v4.2.1, package format is still under discussion

      • will ask for approval after SOL001 v4.2.1 is stable

    • a proposal of updating the information model documentation is planned in R9

    • Updates：

      • SOL001 is delayed and expected to be stable at the end of July

  • CNF runtime model

    • IM: Simplified K8S Resource Model - IM

    • comments:

      • the relationship between k8s-resource and cloud-region should be N:1 rather than 1:N

      • prefer to show the relationship in the diagram

      • suggest to add relationship with the root model

    • Xu will update the IM and discuss next week

  • 5G service / CPS model

  • PNF instance model

    • reverse engineering
      
      

      • feedback to A&AI team:

        • some relationship lack description, and the existing description may not be meaningful enough

      • current status: AAI Schema Reverse-Engineering to Papyrus

    • migrating to new version

      • Jacqueline has done the experiment of creating gendocs using two different versions of eclipse

        • the gendoc of the new version seems fine, but the gendoc of the old version breaks (missing parent class information)

      • AP:

        • Xu will try to experiment the same things as well, and discuss again next week

  • Topology model

    • Proposal: https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/Abstract+Topology+Model

      • Martin will update the models with the IM sketch

    • Model Sketch: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposed+Topology+IM+Sketch
      
      

      • inspired by TAPI model to add "link", "connection" classes

      • looking at ORAN use cases and see if the models can fulfill the requirements

      • TAPI presentation may be found here: otcc2019.KS.002_TAPI_Concepts_Topology_Connectivity.pptx

    • Latest updates:

      • Tony provides some comments on the model sketch:

        • simplify the "service" models

        • relationship between the topology model and ONAP IM / root model

          • currently working on high level concepts, discussing whether we need to have certain objects in the ONAP IM, and maybe part of the topology model

          • e.g., Connectivity, EndPoint

        • from developer's perspective, suggest to avoid too many hops to access the models/info

        • intent part needs further discussion, and suggest to focus on aspects first

      • Andy will arrange further call to discuss the model

• Modeling Documentation
  
  

  • gendoc template discussion:

    • whether the description only applies for a navigatable end of an association

    • add relationship documentation to the UML guideline: ONAPMODEL-28: Using the Documentation Property for RelationshipsOpen

    • UML principle wiki page:

      • Principle and Guideline for Information Model Proposal Using Papyrus (Draft)

      • review the updates to the Gendoc requirements part

        • Michela suggest whether it's possible to add information of associations into the class definitions

          • Xu will investigate it offline

      • Using Papyrus for Modeling updates