Integration R3 M4 Code Freeze Milestone Checklist
Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Product Management | Have all JIRA Stories supporting the release use case been implemented? | Yes |
Getting issues...
| For each JIRA story that are implemented in Amsterdam Release, you have to setup in JIRA the JIRA fixVersion="Amsterdam Release" |
List the Stories that will not be implemented in this current Release. | N/A |
Getting issues...
| For each JIRA story that will not be implemented in Amsterdam Release, you have to setup in JIRA the JIRA fixVersion="Beijing Release" | |
Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been coded and marked as "Closed" in Jira? | Yes | |||
Are all tasks associated with committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Closed" in Jira? | Yes | |||
Release Management | Have all issues pertaining to FOSS been addressed? | Yes | ||
Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed? | N/A | For M2 and M3 Milestones, ensure all findings have been closed. | ||
Has the Project Team reviewed and understood the most recent license scan reports from the LF, for both (a) licenses within the codebase and (b) licenses for third-party build time dependencies? | Yes | |||
For both (a) and (b), have all high priority non-Project Licenses been either removed or escalated as likely exception requests? | Yes | |||
Development | Are all Defects of priority Highest and High in status "Closed" in Jira? | Getting issues... | ||
Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | N/A | Goal: 50% for Incubation project in Beijing | For evidences, provide link(s) to Gerrit repos by providing the URL as shown in this example | |
Is there any binaries (jar, war, tar, gz, gzip, zip files) in Gerrit project repository? | Yes | |||
Is there any pending commit request older than 36 hours in Gerrit? | No | |||
Provide the "% Achived" on the CII Best Practices program. | N/A | Provide link to your project CII Best Practices page. | As documented in CII Badging Program, teams have to fill out CII Best Practices | |
Is there any Critical and Severe level security vulnerabilities older than 60 days old in the third party libraries used within your project unaddressed? Nexus-IQ classifies level as the following:
which is complaint with CVSS V2.0 rating. | No | In the case critical known vulnerability are still showing in the report, fill out the Security/Vulnerability Threat Template - Beijing, Casablanca, Dublin in your project. | Ensure the Nexus-IQ report from “Jenkins CLM” shows 0 critical security vulnerability. Open the Nexus-IQ report for the details on each repo. | |
Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (verify + merge jobs)? | Yes | Provide link to "Merge job" as evidence in Jenkins project tab | ||
Have all OOM Staging Healtcheck related to your project passed? | N/A | |||
Are all snapshot binaries available in Nexus-staging? | Yes | |||
Do you have a clear plan to implement the Independent Versioning and Release Process by RC0? | Yes | Contact the upstream teams to make sure they will release their artifacts (in Nexus Release repo) so you can build by depending on these released artifacts by RC0. | ||
Integration and Testing | Have 100% of Continuous System Integration Testing (CSIT) Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? | N/A | ||
Is there a Docker images available for your project deliverable? | N/A | Provide link to Nexus repos | ||
Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | Yes | Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build | ||
Doc | Has the team created a docs folder and Development and Release Notes documentation templates in Readthedocs? | No | Add a link to your project documentation in ReadTheDocs. | Documentation Team is using Readthedocs for documenting user facing documentation. ReadTheDcos shall be considered as a starting point for someone new within ONAP. The ReadTheDocs is the ONAP Documentation facade visible to users. |
Is the API documentation section populated? | N/A | Link to evidence | Ensure there is at least a direct link toward the API documentation which may be already existing in the wiki. |