Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

For R7 PNF Pre-onboarding


USE CASE

PNF Preonboarding / Onboarding

REQ-319 - Getting issue details... STATUS


VNF SDK STORY JIRA

VNFSDK-597 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Architecture Sub-committee Jira tracker

ONAPARC-575 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Key Contacts
Benjamin Cheung   damian.nowak

BUSINESS DRIVER

This section describes Business Drivers needs.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This requirement enhances the PNF (Onboarding) / Pre-onboarding use case. This requirement introduces package security Option2 improvements on Signature per artifact on the Vendor delivered package as defined in ETSI NFV SOL004 v2.7.1 section 5.2.  The validation of onboarded PM dictionary data based on schema information will be done. The standard can be found here: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-SOL/001_099/004/02.07.01_60/gs_NFV-SOL004v020701p.pdf . In R4 and R6, Option 1 signature per package was developed but not Option 2.

BUSINESS IMPACT - The enhancement to Onboarding & Pre-onboarding is a critical business function because they are vital to design-time operation to properly onboard vendor packages.

BUSINESS MARKETS - This project applies to any domain (wireless, transport, optical, and wireline) that ONAP may manage.

FUNDING/FINANCIAL IMPACTS - The PNF Onboarding & Pre-onboarding use case has Operating Expense (OPEX) savings for operators because of the ability to saving time and expenses during installation and commissioning of PNF resources.

ORGANIZATION MGMT, SALES STRATEGIES - There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this use case outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider.


DEVELOPMENT STATUS

PROJECTPTLUser Story / EpicRequirement
A&AI


AAF

APPC


CLAMP

CC-SDK

DCAE

DMaaP

External API

MODELING

Multi-VIM /

Cloud



OOF

POLICY

PORTAL

SDN-C

SDC

SO

VID

VNFRQTS

VNF-SDK

EPIC #1

Package Validation enhancements notable Package security (option 2 security on entire package)

- Signatures Hashchecks per artifact (applicable for both Option 1 & 2) – in R4/R5/R6 signature Hashcheck may exist for option 1.


CDS

List of PTLs:Approved Projects

*Each Requirement should be tracked by its own User Story in JIRA 

USE CASE DIAGRAM

Use cases define how different users interact with a system under design.  Each use case represents an action that may be performed by a user (defined in UML as an Actor with a user persona).

Use Case Diagram Example.png

USE CASE FUNCTIONAL DEFINITIONS

Use Case Title

PNF Pre-onboarding & Onboarding

Actors (and System Components)

#1 - Vendor / #2 - SDC / #3 - VNF-SDK / #4 - ONAP Components

Description

The base PNF pre-onboarding / onboarding use case is at this wiki:

5G - PNF Pre-Onboarding & Onboarding

SOL004 specifies Package integrity/authenticity

OPTION #1 open package create sign each artifacts of package & create a digest; store calculated hashes in manifest file. Calculator checksum of each artifact. 

OPTION #2 – same but on entire CSAR package. Sign the entire package put with signature.  

Points of Contact

Preconditions

The PNF Vendor package is delivered to ONAP

The PNF Vendor package is described in detail in the "base" wiki page

Triggers / Begins when

Describes the trigger for beginning the Use Case

Steps / Flows (success)

Describes the sequence of steps and interactions that occur during the Use Case (may include: description, data exchanges, functionality, state changes)

Interaction diagrams may be included or referenced

Post-conditions

The expected results of the execution of the Use Case

Includes description of Information Produced

Alternate / Exception Paths

Description of any exceptions or special process that could occur during Use Case

Related Use Cases

List of the Use Cases referenced by this Use Case

Assumptions

Describes any assumptions that are made for this use case

Tools / References / Artifacts

List of any tools or reference material associated with this Use Case as well as any JIRA trace-ability.

List of any associated diagrams or modelling artifacts associated with the Use Case

TESTING

Current Status

  1. Testing Blockers

  2. High visibility bugs
  3. Other issues for testing that should be seen at a summary level
  4. Where possible, always include JIRA links

END TO END FLOW TO BE TESTED


TEST CASES AND STATUS


1There should be a test case for each item in the sequence diagram

NOT YET TESTED

2create additional requirements as needed for each discreet step

COMPLETE

3Test cases should cover entire Use Case

PARTIALLY COMPLETE

 Test Cases should include enough detail for testing team to implement the test

 FAILED

  • No labels