Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

  • PTL Recordings
  • Antitrust Policy Notice

We start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

Agenda

START RECORDING

Duration

Agenda Item

Requested byNotes / Links
30 mins

Cross-project discussion


Oslo Release update

Deprecated project

Oslo Package Update Jiras

Amy Zwarico 

Project Maturity

Byung-Woo Jun 

ONAP component mature state, Mature State Projects

Gold badging is a separate process from the project maturity in LFN?

  • CPS got the gold badging
  • Policy is working on it? Policy team got editing permissions for gold badging wiki pages - WIP
  • What other components do we want to get the gold badging? Follow the http://tlhansen.us/onap/onap.html tool for gold badging
    • Requested the gold badging tool upgrade for: removing deprecated projects and updating editors

LF IT Support


  • Update ONAP main pages for New Delhi release (wiki.onap.org, onap.org) - Sandra Jackson 
  • Submitted ticket for update 
  • Lfx zoom meetings need backup owners for vacation and other occasions 
  • Pending ticket opened by Marek:

    https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-25573

    • Kevin Sandi - a workaround solution will be tried;
    • Marek / Matthew - automatic building solution is needed; escalate this? Waiting for feedback from Marek 
    • Kevin/Matt/Kevin - create a ticket and try a solution (maybe Github action helps? PoC??)
    • Some action plans and updates next week
    • Kevin and Marek are working on it, testing and deployment. will report its status - 90% is working; WIP; scheduled for next week update

    Kevin: Jenkins' sandbox; security patching is working fine; downtime would be 30 mins; will notify the downtime by email to ONAP community - WIP

    Thomas Kulik - issues with Portal-NG and other documentation - 

    IT-26899 Project is not created in RTD - Kevin; found a root cause; almost done, pushed the fixes;

    Marek: Verifying of fixing; will follow up when Thomas Kulik  and Fiete Ostkamp back - next week report; related to RTD pipeline?  need further testing

    Ticket opened by Tony: IT-26848 - Tony is checking on it, still has issues; Kevin will work on it; Thomas will check; should not block any? will work; report its staus next week

    IT-27005 Removing SonarCloud reports for ONAP deprecated project (Policy GUI) - done
Open Source Security / SECCOMByung-Woo Jun 

CISA report on memory safe code: 


  • 2 actions:

    1. OpenSSF- add/update their guidelines; Tony
    2. Locally for ONAP: impact assessment and reviewing if there are opportunities to remove those languages.
  • Added memory safe code guidance to the architecture security review template, ONAP Component Architecture Review Template

OOM 
CCSDKByung-Woo Jun 
  • CCSDK A1 controller committer permission for John Keeney; Dan Timoney will contact John Keeney and plan to promote John as a CCSDK committer. After an election for it, the result will be reported to TSC.
MultiCloudByung-Woo Jun 
  • No MultiCloud activities for several ONAP releases.
  • Discussed this with Seshu; only SO K8s plugin is using it but, we can lock the code and deprecated the project. 
  • Let's check its dependencies to prepare for its deprecation.
Testing Environment


Testing Improvement



CSIT Review



ToolChain Improvement



Documentation

Other Improvement suggestion

Plan to migrate ONAP components to use RFC8040.

  • SDNC and SO decided to move it to Oslo.

----

As backup Dan is working on Biermann but not progressed. ODL is not supporting it. Restconf stack is based on RFC draft. 

  • Preferred approach is to move to RFC8040 (Alternative 1).
    • Originally proposed back in the Kohn release 
    • Plan for the New Delhi release
    • Andreas Geißler DT has someone working on the SO piece to try and port to RFC8040
    • ONAP components will be moved to RFC8040 in New Delhi
  • Alternative 2: keep maintaining Biermann interface.
    • may support either London or Montreal as a long term release
  • Alternative 3: rollback to version before Argon.
  • Alternative 4 (the most drastic): stay where we are for now and begin to work with moving off from ODL.  

As we have no solution, we can not move to ODL Potasium.

Any Update for Oslo from Dan Timoney ?


Subcommittee Updates for PTLs

  1. Recommended packages upgrades are available on the restricted Wiki. Jiras to be created per project. 

    Need to check NG Portal status CLM jobs. Any update?

 - no solution for now:


Ticket opened by Fiete: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-26527 (ticket is closed)

  • ongoing; Jessica and Fiete are discussing this.

We are missing NG Portal UI CLM job.

List of the ONAP components to be disabled prepared by Andreas: 

OOM New Delhi Release

On April 18th, TSC approved the list.

Ticket opened by Fiete for UI CLM scan: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-26882 - not a maven based project - an issue? To be further eleborated with Jess.

Sharing Best Practices




Others

Paweł Pawlak 

ONAP Licensing scans: https://lfscanning.org/reports/onap/onap-2024-06-0592bdfc-78a5-4fa8-a9fd-a7de581457ec.html

IF TIME ALLOWS ....
15 minsRelease status






5 minsUpcoming Events


    • TBD
10 minsRemaining Action Items



Zoom Recordings


Zoom Chat Log



  • No labels