61 Amsterdam branches missing/ambiguous/release-1.1.0 only/Capitalized

Description

 I understand that all projects - even ones providing infrastructure/documentation only should have an amsterdam branch

 I should not have to go through this as an architect/developer - ideally verification and our CI system has run through these

 

There are 4 problematic cases - no amsterdam/release-1.1.0, release-1.1.0 only, or dual amsterdam/release-1.1.0, only master because feature not deployed in amsterdam

For developers the issue is there is no real way to know if a project is beijing only or if the branch is just missing, and for dual release-1.1.0/amsterdam - which branch to commit to

 

In the process of prototyping the blind tagging poc in OOM-500 ran into

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/dcaegen2/analytics,branches

 

the subproject is OK

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/dcaegen2/analytics/tca,branches

 

 Actually there are a lot of projects without branches or with the older release-1.1.0

  • posting the list - may will require a LF job

 Missing amsterdam because repo should be locked

aai/aai-service - see https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-discuss/2017-November/006191.html 

 Capitalization (Amsterdam should be amsterdam)

vnfrqts/requirements

 Missing both amsterdam and release-1.1.0 - only has master  (some may move to Beijing-only which is OK)

oom/registrator

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/oom/registrator,branches

ui

aaf/authz

aaf/cadi

aaf/inno

aaf/luaplugin

ccsdk/dashboard

ccsdk/storage/esaas

ccsdk/platform/blueprints

ccsdk/platform/plugins

dcaegen2/analytics

dcaegen2/collectors

dcaegen2/collectors/snmptrap

dcaegen2/platform

dcaegen2/platform/registrator

dmaap/buscontroller

dmaap/dbcapi

dmaap/datarouter

doc/tools

externalapi/nbi

modeling/modelspec

multicloud/azure

optf/cmso

optf/has

optf/osdf

policy/api

policy/gui

policy/pap

policy/pdp

sdnc/parent (deprecated?)

university

vnfrqts/epics

vnfrqts/guidelines

vnfrqts/testcases

vnfrqts/usecases

vnfsdk/compliance

vnfsdk/functest

vnfsdk/lctest

(why amsterdam only in vnfsdk/model ?)

vnfsdk/pkgtools

vnfsdk/validation

 

 Missing amsterdam but has release-1.1.0 (should cherry pick to amsterdam and delete the release-1.1.0 branch)

sdnc/adaptors

sdnc/core

sdnc/plugins

ui/dmaapbc

 

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/sdnc/adaptors,branches 

 Ambiguous - has both release-1.1.0 and amsterdam - which is the active amsterdam branch

Some like sdnc/northbound and oom have both (oom release-1.1.0 is being removed Friday) – thanks Borislav for reminding and de Talhouet, Alexis alexis.de_talhouet@bell.ca for the quick-in-meeting fix/cherry-picks

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/sdnc/northbound,branches 

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/oom,branches 

 no amsterdam branch - but likely because work is only in Beijing (master) - for some of these there is no container in OOM for example yet

aai/babel

aai/champ

aai/gizmo

sdnc/architecture

sdnc/features

 

 

vvp/ansible-ice-bootstrap

vvp/cms

vvp/devkit

vvp/documentation

vvp/engagementmgr

vvp/gitlab

vvp/image-scanner

vvp/jenkins

vvp/portal

vvp/postgresql

vvp/test-engine

vvp/validation-scripts

 

 

 

clone script being used (old version is still on git - will update shortly) - https://github.com/obrienlabs/onap-root/blob/master/git_recurse.sh 

Assigning to myself temporarily - as per TSC discussion 20171221 - but the work needs to be done by each team

Environment

None

Activity

Show:

Former user February 5, 2018 at 10:47 PM

Gildas, Jessica,
I think we are OK with closing this issue. Cloning across the entire ONAP can be managed per/developer and is a lower priority these days under our other initiative.
Thank you for your work.

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/INT-373

----Original Message----
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT onap-helpdesk@rt.linuxfoundation.org
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 17:04
To: gildas.lanilis@huawei.com
Cc: Michael O'Brien <Frank.Obrien@amdocs.com>; kpaul@linuxfoundation.org; probb@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #50270] Amsterdam Missing branches

Dear Gildas,

Do we need to revive this discussion?
As mentioned before we took the holiday break, I created the amsterdam branch for those repos which actually made a Nexus/Nexus3 publication.

If a repo that did not made a release needs an amsterdam branch, it is still under the committer's group power to create the branch if they really need it. They have these permissions to create branches via Gerrit GUI.

Let me know if we need to bring this matter up.

Thanks a ton
Jess

On Thu Dec 21 15:25:08 2017, Frank.Obrien@amdocs.com wrote:
> Gildas,
> Hi, The branches are in the body of the jira and posted to onap-
> discuss - we will need to discuss what to do with the duplicated and
> ones that don't require a branch yet.
> https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-discuss/2017-
> December/007033.html
> Take all the highlighted green strings and retrofit them in the URL
> to see them Example
>
> aaf/authz
>
> is
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/aaf/authz,branches
>
> Some correlation will need to be done to identify the teams for
> example optf = Homing
>
>
> ----------------------------------- https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/INT-
> 373 extract
>
>
> Missing amsterdam because repo should be locked
>
> aai/aai-service - see https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-
> discuss/2017-November/006191.html
>
> https://jira.onap.org/images/icons/emoticons/forbidden.png
> Capitalization (Amsterdam should be amsterdam)
>
> vnfrqts/requirements
>
> https://jira.onap.org/images/icons/emoticons/forbidden.png Missing
> both amsterdam and release-1.1.0 - only has master (some may move to
> Beijing-only which is OK)
>
> oom/registrator
>
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/oom/registrator,branches
>
> ui
>
> aaf/authz
>
> aaf/cadi
>
> aaf/inno
>
> aaf/luaplugin
>
> ccsdk/dashboard
>
> ccsdk/storage/esaas
>
> ccsdk/platform/blueprints
>
> ccsdk/platform/plugins
>
> dcaegen2/analytics
>
> dcaegen2/collectors
>
> dcaegen2/collectors/snmptrap
>
> dcaegen2/platform
>
> dcaegen2/platform/registrator
>
> dmaap/buscontroller
>
> dmaap/dbcapi
>
> dmaap/datarouter
>
> doc/tools
>
> externalapi/nbi
>
> modeling/modelspec
>
> multicloud/azure
>
> optf/cmso
>
> optf/has
>
> optf/osdf
>
> policy/api
>
> policy/gui
>
> policy/pap
>
> policy/pdp
>
> sdnc/parent (deprecated?)
>
> university
>
> vnfrqts/epics
>
> vnfrqts/guidelines
>
> vnfrqts/testcases
>
> vnfrqts/usecases
>
> vnfsdk/compliance
>
> vnfsdk/functest
>
> vnfsdk/lctest
>
> (why amsterdam only in vnfsdk/model ?)
>
> vnfsdk/pkgtools
>
> vnfsdk/validation
>
>
>
> https://jira.onap.org/images/icons/emoticons/forbidden.png Missing
> amsterdam but has release-1.1.0 (should cherry pick to amsterdam and
> delete the release-1.1.0 branch)
>
> sdnc/adaptors
>
> sdnc/core
>
> sdnc/plugins
>
> ui/dmaapbc
>
>
>
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/sdnc/adaptors,branches
>
> https://jira.onap.org/images/icons/emoticons/forbidden.png Ambiguous
> - has both release-1.1.0 and amsterdam - which is the active amsterdam
> branch
>
> Some like sdnc/northbound and oom have both (oom release-1.1.0 is
> being removed Friday) - thanks Borislav for reminding and de Talhouet,
> Alexis
> alexis.de_talhouet@bell.ca[https://jira.onap.org/images/icons/mail_sma
> ll.gif]<alexis.de_talhouet@bell.ca>
> for the quick-in-meeting fix/cherry-picks
>
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/sdnc/northbound,branches
>
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/oom,branches
>
> https://jira.onap.org/images/icons/emoticons/add.png no amsterdam
> branch - but likely because work is only in Beijing (master) - for
> some of these there is no container in OOM for example yet
>
> aai/babel
>
> aai/champ
>
> aai/gizmo
>
> sdnc/architecture
>
> sdnc/features
>
> vvp/ansible-ice-bootstrap
>
> vvp/cms
>
> vvp/devkit
>
> vvp/documentation
>
> vvp/engagementmgr
>
> vvp/gitlab
>
> vvp/image-scanner
>
> vvp/jenkins
>
> vvp/portal
>
> vvp/postgresql
>
> vvp/test-engine
>
> vvp/validation-scripts
>
>
>
>
> From: Gildas Lanilis gildas.lanilis@huawei.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 13:45
> To: helpdesk@onap.org; Michael O'Brien <Frank.Obrien@amdocs.com>
> Cc: Kenny Paul <kpaul@linuxfoundation.org>; Phil Robb
> <probb@linuxfoundation.org>
> Subject: Amsterdam Missing branches
>
> Hi Helpdesk,
>
> I am creating this ticket to follow up with an issue Michael brought
> up at TSC meeting this am.
> Looks like some repos have missing branches for Amsterdam. Michael has
> created defect https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/INT-373
>
> Michael,
> Looking at Jira issue https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/INT-373 I can't
> find the list of missing branches. Could you help out? That will help
> LF to move forward.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Gildas
>
> [HuaweiLogowithName]
> Gildas Lanilis
> ONAP Release Manager
> Santa Clara CA, USA
> gildas.lanilis@huawei.com<gildas.lanilis@huawei.com>
> Mobile: 1 415 238 6287
>
> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
>
> you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
> <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>

Former user December 22, 2017 at 7:01 PM

Will discuss in Jan with Gildas and Jessica

Former user December 21, 2017 at 3:26 PM
Edited

.

Former user December 21, 2017 at 3:26 PM
Edited

 

.

 

Former user December 21, 2017 at 3:25 PM
Edited

.

Won't Do

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Fix versions

Affects versions

Priority

Created December 21, 2017 at 5:38 AM
Updated August 12, 2023 at 4:13 AM
Resolved February 5, 2018 at 10:47 PM