Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

General Information:

  • Date and Time: 2020, March 30th, 10pm~11pm Beijing Time, 10am~11am US Eastern
  • Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535
  • Meeting Recording: 
  • Meeting Chat Log:

Agenda:

  • Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
  • Model Proposals - 30 minutes
    • license management - 15 minutes
    • allotted resource - 15 minutes
    • 5G RAN service - 0 minutes
  • Modeling Documentation - 10 minutes
  • Modeling Glossary - 10 minutes
  • Modeling Process discussion - 0 minutes

Material:

Minutes:

  • Agenda bashing
    • PNF instance model status & plan
      • Jimmy re-start the meeting? Jacqueline will help check with Jimmy
    • Meeting time check
      • possible overlap meetings:
        • Fred's ETSI alignment call (2 hours earlier)
        • use case call (1 hour earlier on the calendar), Michela will help check with Ben
        • PTL call (2 hour earlier)
      • will keep the current meeting time based on the current information, and collect information first
  • Model Proposals
    • license management
      • License Model Review Comments
        • 1) what is the use of the colors in the figure? Answer: highlight the objects that ask for agreements. Then suggest to also highlight "BusinessInteraction" class
        • 2) LicenseKeyInstance and EntitlementInstance classes should add notes to clarify they are not stored and used in ONAP now
        • 3) software should be replaced by VNFD, not VNF
        • 4) description of LicenseKeyPool is suggested to be refined
        • 5) SPPoolLimit and VendorPoolLimit are not progressed yet, need further action
        • 6) multiplicity of "validFor" attribute in the DesignedEntity class is suggested to be "0..1"
        • 7) check VNF instance relationship with LicenseKeyInstance
        • 8) #19 not progressed
        • ...
      • will try to update today
      • sequence diagram, needed or not? consider to remove it for now
    • allotted resource
    • 5G RAN service model
  • Modeling Documentation
    • wiki page to record approved models
      • need further review
    • how to document relationship classes in Papyrus and readthedocs
      • Michela will give presentation on tomorrow's modeling subcommittee
    • how to treat "experimental" objects in readthedocs
      • opnion from Michela: not include "experimental" objects in the release readthedocs
        • Andy: agrees the release document should be clean
        • Jacqueline: "experimental" objects are accessible through papyrus
        • Michela: in wiki, show approved models with the release name
      • Jacqueline: do we need 2 gendoc templates? 1 for release document (only contain approved objects), the other for generating working documents/proposals (contain all objects)
        • seems so, have 2 templates
      • Xu: what about the figures? should we remove "experimental" objects out of the figure?
        • Jacqueline: suggest to generate a clean figure
        • Jacqueline: is it possible to approve only part of the model?
          • Andy: could be
      • the current agreement:
        • only contain clean models in the release readthedocs
        • figure should also only contain clean models (need manual works)
        • AP: generate a new gendoc template for the release readthedocs, contains only the preliminary objects; Xu will look at this issue
  • Modeling Glossary
  • Modeling Process Discussion
  • No labels