Overview
| Project Name | Data movement as a platform |
|---|---|
| Target Release Name | Beijing Release |
| Project Lifecycle State | Either Incubation, Core, Mature. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information |
| Participating Company | AT&T, Tech Mahindra |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
AAF integration with Message Router, Data Router will be added to the DMaap and some enhancements to the DMaap client
Use Cases
The existing Amsterdam use cases are still going to be supported and additional use cases related to the will be supported for the Beijing Release
Minimum Viable Product
For Beijing release, the minimum viable product we are targeting is integrating AAF with the Message router, sending and receiving messages using Data router.
Functionalities
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.
Epics
Stories
Longer term roadmap
DMaaP is a premier platform for high performing and cost effective data movement services that transports and processes data from any source to any target with the format, quality, security, and concurrency required to serve the business and customer needs.
Release Deliverables
| Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description |
|---|---|
AAF integration with Data Router | DMaap Git repository |
| Data Router source code | DMaap Git repository |
| Data Router library | ONAP Nexus repository |
| Data Router API description | ONAP wiki |
| Data Router Release Notes | ONAP wiki |
| Data Routee Documentation | DMaap Git repository |
Sub-Components
As part of the Beijing release,Data Router will be added to the DMaap
Architecture
High level architecture diagram
Platform Maturity
Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.
| Area | Actual Level | Targeted Level for current Release | How, Evidences | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 0 | 1 | Baseline performance criteria will be defined |
|
| Stability | 1 | 1 | 72 hours soak test with random transactions |
|
| Resiliency | 2 | 2 |
| |
| Security | 0 | 1 |
| |
| Scalability | 1 | 1 | Level 1 single site horizontal scaling |
|
| Manageability | 1 | 1 | Using EELF common framework for logging |
|
| Usability | 1 | 2 | API documentation and swagger API provided |
|
API Incoming Dependencies
List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.
Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.
| API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAF | Authentication and Authorization Framework | TBD | March 08 2010 | TBD |
API Outgoing Dependencies
API this project is delivering to other projects.
| API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Publishing | API used to post a message to the Topic | Sept 11 2017 | March 08 2018 | DMaap API |
| Subscribing | API used to subscribe a message from the Topic | Sept 11 2017 | March 08 2018 | DMaap API |
| Provisining | API for creating,deleting and listing the administrative objects | Sept 11 2017 | March 08 2018 | DMaap API |
| Admin API | API for the admin access | Sept 11 2017 | March 08 2018 | DMaap API |
Third Party Products Dependencies
| Name | Description | Version |
|---|---|---|
| AJSC | Java services container | 1.0.0 |
| Kafka | Distributed messaging platform | 0.8.2.1 |
| Zoo Keeper | Centralized service for maintaining configuration information | 3.4.6 |
| Spring | Spring Framework | 1.4 |
| Docker | Container engine | 1.12 |
Testing and Integration Plans
- Unit test: Unit tests has atleast 30% code coverage.
- Functional test: Leverage the robot framework infrastructure to provide the functional test.
- Integration test: Support integration team to provide the end to end integration test.
- All the above should be automation tests run on the LF Jenkins Infrastructure.
Gaps
No gaps identified so far
Known Defects and Issues
Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.
Risks
No known risks so far.
Resources
Updated the Resources Committed to the Release .
Release Milestone
The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
Team Internal Milestone
Documentation, Training
- Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
- Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
- High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
- Documentation includes items such as:
- Installation instructions
- Configuration instructions
- Developer guide
- End User guide
- Admin guide
- ...
Other Information
Vendor Neutral
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
Free and Open Source Software
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.