DMaaP R2 Beijing Release Plan


Overview

Project Name

Data movement as a platform

Project Name

Data movement as a platform

Target Release Name

Beijing  Release

Project Lifecycle State

Incubation (Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information)

Participating Company 

AT&T, Tech Mahindra

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

AAF integration with Message Router, Data Router, and Bus Controller will be added to the DMaap and some enhancements to the DMaap client.

Use Cases

The existing Amsterdam use cases are still going to be supported and additional use cases related to DR and Bus Controller  will be supported for the Beijing Release.

Minimum Viable Product

For Beijing release, the minimum viable product we are targeting is  integrating AAF  with the Message Router, sending and receiving messages using Data router, and provisioning topics and feeds via Bus Controller.

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Stories

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh



Longer term roadmap

DMaaP is a premier platform for high performing and cost effective data movement services that transports and processes data from any source to any target with the format, quality, security, and concurrency required to serve the business and customer needs.

Release Deliverables



Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

AAF integration with Data Router

DMaap Git repository

Data Router source code

DMaap Git repository

Data Router library

ONAP Nexus repository

Data Router API description

ONAP wiki

Data Router Release Notes

ONAP wiki

Data Router Documentation

DMaap Git repository

Bus Controller API

DMaaP Git repo

Bus Controller Container

ONAP Nexus repo

Bus Controller source code

DMaaP Git repo

Sub-Components

As part of the Beijing release, the following components will be added to DMaaP:

  • Data Router - for file transport

  • Bus Controller Provisioning API - for provisioning of topics (MR), feeds (DR) and permissions (AAF)

  • Bus Controller GUI - human interface to Bus Controller Provisioning API

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

Area

Actual Level

Targeted Level for current Release

How, Evidences

Comments

Area

Actual Level

Targeted Level for current Release

How, Evidences

Comments

Performance

0

1

Baseline performance criteria will be defined

  • 0 -- none

  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured

  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented

Stability

1

1

72 hours soak test with random transactions

  • 0 – none

  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions

  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions

  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate

Resiliency

2

2

K8S auto detection and recovery

  • 0 – none

  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)

  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)

  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)

Security

0

1



  • 0 – none

  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage

  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls

  • 3 – CII Gold

Scalability

1

1

Level 1 single site horizontal scaling

  • 0 – no ability to scale

  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling

  • 2 – geographic scaling

  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances

Manageability

1

1

Using EELF common framework for logging

  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour

  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management

Usability

1

2

API documentation and swagger API provided

  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation

  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation



  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

AAF

Authentication and Authorization Framework

TBD

March 08 2010

TBD

  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

Publishing

API used to post a message to the Topic

Sept 11 2017

March 08 2018

DMaap API

Subscribing

API used to subscribe a message from the Topic

Sept 11 2017

March 08 2018

DMaap API

Provisining

API for creating,deleting and listing the administrative objects

Sept 11 2017

March 08 2018

DMaap API (Bus Controller API)

Admin API

API for the admin access

Sept 11 2017

March 08 2018

DMaap API

  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Name

Description

Version

Name

Description

Version

AJSC

Java services container

1.0.0

Kafka

Distributed messaging platform

0.8.2.1

Zoo Keeper

Centralized service for maintaining configuration information

3.4.6

Spring

Spring Framework

1.4

Docker

Container engine

1.12

  • TESTING AND INTEGRATION PLANS

  1. Unit test: Unit tests has atleast 30% code coverage.

  2. Functional test: Leverage the robot framework infrastructure to provide the functional test.

  3. Integration test: Support integration team to provide the end to end integration test.

  4. All the above should be automation tests run on the LF Jenkins Infrastructure.



  • GAPS

No gaps identified so far

  • KNOWN DEFECTS AND ISSUES

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

  • RISKS

No known risks so far.

  • RESOURCES

Updated  the Resources Committed to the Release .

  • RELEASE MILESTONE

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • TEAM INTERNAL MILESTONE

  • This section may be used to document internal milestones that the team agreed on.

    Also, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, provide these agreements and dates in this section.

    It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

Date

Project

Deliverable

Date

Project

Deliverable

3/29/2018

DMaaP

DMaap - Buscontroller

Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.



Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.