The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.

Overview

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

• Maintenance of current Platform MVP components (Highest Priority)

  • 50% code coverage (Java and Javascript)

  • Reliability of S3P functionality

  • Security Enhancements to further progress towards Silver badge

    • internal communication encrypted

    • role-based access control and authorization for all calls

  • Logging spec v1.2 requirements

• Auto Scale Out Use Case (High Priority)

  • Implement new SO API call for Scale Out

  • Support Guard Policies creation by CLAMP (Stretch Goal - not enough resources)

  • Implement min/max of instances check similar to VID (Stretch Goal - not enough resources and/or information to fully commit) 

  • Implement Prov_Status=PROV check (Stretch Goal - not enough resources and/or information to fully commit)

• HPA Functional Requirement (Medium Priority)

  • Creation of Application that integrates with SDC Service Distribution

    • Must support current API and have hooks to support future Policy Lifecycle API

    • Health Check, CSIT, Dockerized, K8S HELM Chart, S3P, 70% code coverage

  • Code implementation for automatic creation of HPA Placement policies located in VNF descriptor for OOF to perform placement (Dependent upon creation of Policy SDC Service Distribution application)

    • Include CSIT test

• Re-architecture of the Platform components for long term roadmap (Low Priority)
  
  

  • Ingest of Apex PDP engine

    • Health Check, CSIT, Dockerized, HELM Chart, S3P, 70% code coverage

  • PAP 2nd Generation

    • Re-build of PAP ↔ PDP Policy Distribution API using Maven Nexus Repo.

    • Re-build of PAP ↔ PDP Grouping

    • Above 2 requirements will involve creation of PDP SDK (2nd Generation)

    • Policy Lifecycle API

    • Health Check, CSIT, Dockerized, HELM Chart, S3P, 70% code coverage

  • XACML PDP 2nd Generation

    • Configurability of XACML Combining Algorithms for root engine

    • Open support for raw XACML policies

    • Integration with PDP SDK (2nd Generation)

  • Policy Engineer Development Environment

    • Documentation

Use Cases

vFW/vDNS/vCPE/VOLTE - Test only support

Minimum Viable Product

• Policy Portal Dashboard - Console GUI where Models, Templates can be imported, updated, deleted, as well as, policies can be created, updated and deleted. The console GUI also has a dashboard where PDP's can be grouped and where Operators can control where policies are distributed to.

• Policy PAP web application - Policy backend that manages communication with PDP engines for policy distribution.

• Policy Drools PDP - run-time execution of Control Loop operational policies. Supports queries from other ONAP components to retrieve

• Policy XACML PDP - run-time execution of Control Loop configuration policies of DCAE collectors, analytics and micro services.

• Policy BRMS Gateway - intermediary backend for distributing policies to the Drools PDP and configuration details to the Drools PDP controller.

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

Stories

Longer term roadmap

Casablanca will begin development of its new architecture as described in this wiki: The ONAP Policy Framework

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

• API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

• API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

• Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

• TESTING AND INTEGRATION PLANS

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

• GAPS

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

• KNOWN DEFECTS AND ISSUES

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

• RISKS

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

• RESOURCES

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

• RELEASE MILESTONE

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

• TEAM INTERNAL MILESTONE

This section is optional.

• DOCUMENTATION, TRAINING

http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/beijing/submodules/policy/engine.git/docs/index.html

Other Information

• Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

• Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.

Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.