Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »


Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameBeijing  Release
Project Lifecycle StateEither Incubation, Core, Mature. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information
Participating Company AT&T, Tech Mahindra

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

AAF integration with Message Router, Data Router will be added to the DMaap and some enhancements to the DMaap client

Use Cases

The existing Amsterdam use cases are still going to be supported and additional use cases related to the will be supported for the Beijing Release

Minimum Viable Product

For Beijing release, the minimum viable product we are targeting is  integrating AAF  with the Message router, sending and receiving messages using Data router.

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Stories

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh


Longer term roadmap

DMaaP is a premier platform for high performing and cost effective data movement services that transports and processes data from any source to any target with the format, quality, security, and concurrency required to serve the business and customer needs.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description

AAF integration with Data Router

DMaap Git repository
Data Router source codeDMaap Git repository
Data Router libraryONAP Nexus repository
Data Router API descriptionONAP wiki
Data Router Release NotesONAP wiki
Data Routee DocumentationDMaap Git repository

Sub-Components

As part of the Beijing release,Data Router will be added to the DMaap

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance01
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability11
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency22
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security02
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability11
  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability11
  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability12
  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation


  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
AAFAuthentication and Authorization FrameworkTBDMarch 08 2010TBD
  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
PublishingAPI used to post a message to the TopicSept 11 2017March 08 2018DMaap API
SubscribingAPI used to subscribe a message from the TopicSept 11 2017March 08 2018DMaap API
ProvisiningAPI for creating,deleting and listing the administrative objectsSept 11 2017March 08 2018DMaap API
Admin APIAPI for the admin accessSept 11 2017March 08 2018DMaap API
  • Third Party Products Dependencies

NameDescriptionVersion
AJSCJava services container1.0.0
KafkaDistributed messaging platform0.8.2.1
Zoo KeeperCentralized service for maintaining configuration information3.4.6
SpringSpring Framework1.4
DockerContainer engine1.12
  • Testing and Integration Plans

  1. Unit test: Unit tests has atleast 30% code coverage.
  2. Functional test: Leverage the robot framework infrastructure to provide the functional test.
  3. Integration test: Support integration team to provide the end to end integration test.
  4. All the above should be automation tests run on the LF Jenkins Infrastructure.


  • Gaps

No gaps identified so far

  • Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

  • Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out
  • Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out
  • Documentation, Training

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
  • Documentation includes items such as:
    • Installation instructions
    • Configuration instructions
    • Developer guide
    • End User guide
    • Admin guide
    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.

  • No labels