Overview

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Release Focus

DCAE Focus for R8 is on following

• ONAP R8 Usecase & Functional requirement 
• TSC/SECCOM Global requirements
• DCAE Transformation to support Helm deployment for services
• General platform optimization (Cloudify upgrade for python 3.6)
• Addressing other DCAE back logs  + security fixes

Honolulu Usecases with DCAE impact

Honolulu Features with DCAE Impact

Honolulu Spec with DCAE Impact

Honolulu DCAE POC

Best Practice Candidates

Platform Maturity

 Platform Maturity (i.e., S3P items)  Guilin Release Platform Maturity

 Green color → Target level ( details see Platform Maturity below)

• Performance:  Level 1
• Stability: Level 2
• Resiliency: Level 2
• Security: Level 1+
• Scalability: Level 1
• Manageability: Level 1+
• Usability: Level 1+             

Minimum Viable Product

The MVP of DCAE will include the necessary subcomponents supporting the primary objectives: meeting platform maturity goals and supporting the use cases.

• •   Cloudify Manager
  •   Consul (deployed/managed by OOM)
  •   DeploymentHander
  •   Policy-Handler
  •   ServiceChangeHandler
  •   Inventory-API
  •   Postgres
  •   ConfigBinding Service
  •   Dashboard

DCAE Service specific components

• •   VESCollector
  •   TCA-gen2
  •   PRH
  •   HV_VES

      DCAE-MOD deployment is optional and will include following component (controlled via helm chart configuration under OOM)

• Genprocessor
• MOD/NiFI UI
• Distributorapi
• Runtimeapi
• Onboardingapi

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

Stories

Longer term roadmap

DCAE is the collection and analytics platform serving ONAP.  Improving upon the DCAE MS catalog to add new services for data collection, analytics and the number of open/close control loops.

DCAE-MOD evolution and integration with CLAMP and Policy

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Note: Only default platform components and bootstrapped MS is listed on table above. DCAE also include dynamic service components deployed based on usecases. For a complete set of available DCAE MS - refer https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-dcaegen2/en/latest/sections/release-notes.html#deliverables

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release. Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Resources and Repositories (Deprecated) in the centralized page.

In addition to existing platform/service component, following new components are targeted for Honolulu.

ONAP Dependencies

List the other ONAP projects you depend on.

DCAE depends on the the following components as part of the general ONAP architecture:

• AAI: DCAE MS retrieves and updates VNF data from/to AAI
• DMaaP: Message bus for communication with other components in the solution
• Policy - For managing application configuration policy
• CLAMP - For CL flow related MS instantiation and configuration
• OOF - For SON handler support

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the Amsterdam architecture diagram_1.0.0.pptx.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Platform Maturity

Refering to 2017-06-28 CII badging for ONAP.pptx and Platform Maturity Requirements (aka Carrier Grade), fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

• API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects. Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

• API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

• Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected. List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

• Testing and Integration Plans

  • • Unit Test addition will be enforced part of new code submission
    • CSIT tests will continue to be supported for existing components
    • Pairwise testing will be done in the WindRiver Dev lab similar to what was done in last release

• Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release. List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

• Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

• Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

• Resources

Fill out the Resources and Repositories (Deprecated) centralized page

• Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Planning (legacy) and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

• Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

• Documentation, Training

• 
  

  • • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
    • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
    • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
    • Documentation includes items such as:
      • Installation instructions
      • Configuration instructions
      • Developer guide
      • End User guide
      • Admin guide

Honolulu Documentation

Other Information

• • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

• • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible. List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ). In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.

Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP TSC Charter OBSOLETE 7 1 CLEAN.pdf.