2020-11-04 Meeting notes (ONAP/O-RAN-SC/SMO - Meeting)

Date

Nov 4, 2020 | 9am PST |  noon EST | 17:00 UTC | 18:00 CET | 21:30 IST |

Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/436210993

Attendees



Informed

Please add yourself. Thanks!





  • @Andrea Buldorini [TIM] 

  • @alexander.dehn

  • @John Ng

  • @George Clapp

  • @Herbert Eiselt

  • @Kapil Singal (Deactivated)

  • @Tracy Van Brakle

See also

Goals

  • share information between

    • O-RAN-SC Non-RT-RIC

    • O-RAN-SC OAM

    • O-RAN-SC SMO

    • ONAP CCSDK/SDNC/SDN-R

    • LFN 

Recording

link to the zoom (mp4 format)

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

00:00

Admin

@Martin Skorupski

Next meeting: 2020-11-11

00:05

O-RAN-SC

O-RAN-SC PTLs

Status reports:

  • SMO:

    • ongoing - see last weeks meeting minutes

    • LNF project onboarding

  • Non-RT-RIC:

    • focus O-RAN-SC to use the ONAP Adapter → Doc

    • testing an demos in preparation

    • Licensing issues becomes now also in issue

  • SIM:

    • sim/o1-interface: updated code in gerrit

      • working on LF Jenkins jobs for the new code

    • final preparations for Cherry (INT specific tasks)

  • OAM:

    • ONAP SDN-R code adopted for ODL Aluminium → module tests ongoing

      • RestConf to NetConf subtree filtering

    • IPv6: End-to-End tests moved to Honolulu

    • GuiCutThrough feature under investigations based on augmentation of ietf-systems

00:16

Use Case

@Swaminathan Seetharaman

Use Cases

Please see page #2 for details: 
5G Use Cases in R7 Guilin. - 

very first view - to be discussed further:



  1.  BULK PM -  PM data collection and control

    • 100% aligned with O-RAN interface specification; use case was demonstrated several times

      • PM collection mechanism aligned to 3GPP
        proposal: Check updates of 3GPP pm xml file format and updates of VES messages 

  1.  

    •  

      • PM subscription mechanisms aligned to 3GPP
        proposal: An update could be required in the future for an alignment with recent new 3GPP Parametricjob class 

  2. OOF -SON PCI (5G)

  3. 5G SERVICE MODELING & DEFINITION (5G)

    •  UC under analysis 

  4. CONFIGURATION PERSISTENCE SERVICE (CPS)

    • ONAP provides a  persistency data service that can be used for any XNF configuration data (Poc in Rel G, new ONAP component in Rel H)

    • CPS is model driven and it may use any YANG model adopted by any xNF (e.g.  3GPP YANG models and vendor extensions)   

    • open: is the abstraction by 3GPP and O-RAN sufficient for all the targeted use case - how do µServices, rApps make use of C&PS, if C&PS is device model driven and not service model driven?

    • Idea: Contribution of consumer view

      • @gasparini24 to carry forward (thanks)

  5. xNF LICENSING MANAGEMENT

    • not subject of O-RAN (yet)

    • proposal: defer or contribute terms, definitions, specifications to O-RAN

  6. ONAP/3GPP & ORAN Alignment

    • O-RAN O1 data models are augmenting 3GPP data models

    • A1, R1, O2 data models are subject of O-RAN only

  7. ONAP/ORAN Alignment -A1 adapter

    • Detailed alignment/collaboration needed with O-RAN-SC Non-RT-RIC project (For details please reach-out to @John Keeney (Ericsson EST))

      • testing: please include @Lasse Kaihlavirta

  8. 5G NRM Simulator in ONAP (CM)

    • CM is part of O-RAN OAM Architecture and OAM interface specification
      proposal: as a staring point the 3GPP NRM yang models V16.0.5 from July 2020 should be used - for VES the version 7.2 is specified.  

    • note: 5G NRM is not a ONAP Rel G UC

  9. E2E NETWORK SLICING (5G Use Case)

    • Network Slicing is not part of 3GPP NRM so far
      proposal: waiting for 3GPP and O-RAN specifications  - V17 draft is available

  10. PNF sw upgrade in ONAP is aligned to ORAN O1 specification

  11. xNF Package and onboarding in ONAP
     -   xNF Package complaiant to ETSI SOL004,
    -    additional xNF artifacts have been introduced and supported: 
                  -  VES event, and PM dictionary artifacts according to VES event registration specifications
                  -  Additional artifacts (e.g. xNF YANG model)

  12. VES specification are defined by ONAP in  VNF requirement project

  13. Control Loop in TOSCA PoC 

    1. A Control Loop and Control Loop components havw been defined in TOSCA and deployed



Feedback from @John Keeney (Ericsson EST): Request for chat for such use cases in Honolulu. 

00:45



@Mahesh

Application Package Structure

  • TOSCA 

Info from @Michela Bevilacqua

  • ONAP enhanced TOSCA 

  • API schema definition for YANG and VES

On the agenda for next week - thanks!!! 

00:55





Questions and Answers

  • Non-RT-RIC: External API vs. config map

END



Backup







00:10



Mahesh

Postman scripts to interface with the SMO and in turn test O1 interface between the SMO and different parts of O-RAN instances of O-CU, O-DU, O-RU and RIC using these models. 

  • yang modules

  • framework for test and validate CM 

share content in in SMO gerrit and create wiki linking to the same source

  • Working on a framework for vendors for OAM/YANG tests

  • O-RAN-SC to host the framework

  • Postman and vsCode as RestClients

  • Alex about to setup a SIM in OSC lab - involve Rittwik in a O-RAN private lab

  • OpenFronthaul

  • 3GPP models are considered.

Feedback from Rittwik

  • SMO in T-Labs

  • how to run Netopeer server - req to Felix (O-RAN-SC INT PTL)

  • Alex asked for VMs 

Init script (Postman) for O-RAN OAM FH M-Plane (o-ran-interface.yang augmenting ) interface demoed

RFC8040 (RestConf by IETF) support supported by ODL

00:25



@Konrad Bańka

Konrad is absent this week. The presentation will be made when Konrad is available.

O-RAN Component deployment

The question is: How to deploy the red colored CNFs/VNFs of the O-RAN-Architecture?

  • CNF for O-RAN-components 

    • model of CNF - how to be configured, how many components, blueprints

    • CDS model needs to be created

    • Network-service based on several CNFs

      • CNF types

        • Near-RT-RIC

        • O-CU-UP

        • O-CU-CP

        • O-DU

For detailed discussion the following page was created:



Package

  • for Network Functions (priority)

  • for Network Service (second step)

CNFs or VNFs

  • both should be considered 

    • let's start with CNFs first

    • VNF is considered as additional option



  • no CNFs and VNFs combined in a single package

    • maybe not for rApps → 

    • VNF should take care about internal CNFs


Action items