Class vs Datatype Categorization

Background:

Current resource information model has all objects categorized as "class". Comments received state that some of them should be “Datatype” instead of “Class”.

The proposal is to follow the ETSI IFA015 v2.4.1 document to change some of the objects to be categorized as "Datatype".

This page shows the current proposal and collects feedback within 1 week's time (until Apr. 22, while recommend to feedback before Apr. 20).



Current Proposal:

Category

Category

Objects categorized as “Class”

Objects categorized as “Datatype”

Vnfd

VirtualCpuData

Vdu

VirtualMemoryData

SwImageDesc

LogicalNodeData

VirtualComputeDesc

LinkBitrateRequirements

VirtualStorageDesc

ScaleInfo

Cpd

QoS

VduCpd

LocalAffinityOrAntiAffinityRule

VnfExtCpd

AddressData

VduProfile

L2AddressData

VirtualNetworkInterfaceRequirements

L3AddressData

VnfVirtualLinkDesc

CpProtocolData

VnfDf

ConnectivityType

VirtualLinkProfile

VirtualCpuPinningData

VirtualLinkDescFlavour

RequestedAdditionalCapabilityData

InstantiationLevel

VnfConfigurableProperties

VduLevel

VnfcConfigurableProperties

AffinityOrAntiAffinityGroup

LifecycleManagementScript

VnfIndicator

MonitoringParameter

VnfdElementGroup

VnfInfoModifiableAttributes

PlacementGroup (Experimental)



BaseConfigGroup (Experimental)



DeploymentGroup (Experimental)