| | | |
|---|
Strategy (45 minutes)
| ONAP takeaways |
| We are encouraging ONAP consumers to share with us their feedback, so we could prioritize our activities and make ONAP better suited their needs and requirements. |
|---|
LFN Cross-Organization UpdatesMAC, SPC, TAC, EUAG, LFN Board | | Discussions between Arpit Joshipura, Byung-Woo Jun, Jilll Lovato, Louis Llluzzi and Sunny Cai: Arpit's input: Highlight the value proposition of ONAP, including overall statistics (e.g., contributors, LOC, etc.) over its lifetime. Provide deployment examples with links to DT, CMCC, Ericsson, and others Emphasize the product integration of ONAP Use headlines like: "From Control loops and Intent-based to full AI Orchestration and Management." Highlight security contributions, such as those provided during the OPS 5G project by US Government for Networking slicing Address past criticisms of ONAP being too large and complex by emphasizing recent efforts, such as "streamlining microservices and modules, archiving legacy software, etc." This is one shot we get. Let's make it BIG!
Byung-Woo Jun, together with ONAP TSC members, will collaborate with Jill, Louise, Sunny to create compelling marketing catch points. Byung-Woo Jun, Jill Lovato, Louise Lluzzi and Sunny Cai (along with others) plan to hold an initial call sometime next week to outline our plans. Byung intends to engage with TSC members following the initial discussion.
|
TCC / ONAP Liaison Updates | |
|
Task Force Updates | |
|
TSC Strategy | | From the Paris release, TSC needs to discuss ONAP focus areas and strategies / roadmaps Let's discuss more this year for Paris + @Byung-Woo Jun presented the brainstorm at the TSC meeting this week. Brainstorm: Ensure ONAP core components are focused and operate independently, from build to runtime DT finishes Argo-CD based component independent deployment Argo-CD is a DT choice, but ONAP can allow other CDs, e.g., Flux (need contributors) DT plans to productize some of the selected ONAP core components early next year in their TNAP production environment
Declarative and Intent-based component operations by the Repository-based Network Automation : see the ideas from ONAP Architecture Evolution - 2025.pdf
Make ONAP core components more autonomous and ready for use by both ONAP, LF and other external users During New Delhi and Oslo releases, CPS and Policy achieved the OpenSSF Gold Badging status. Kudos to the team! Continue to promote/facilitate other ONAP core components for the Gold Badging status (e.g., UUI, SDNC)
Incorporate more GenAI capabilities and use cases to the ONAP components, and promote the adoption of open-source LLM models and frameworks aligned with LF AI & Data and GenAI Commons Collaborate with LF AI & Data GenAI Commons and Nephio GenAI for 5G and 6G Open-source based models and controls AI-Based Control Loop AI Model-As-A-Service ETSI ISG NFV compliance for AI?
Foster inter-community collaboration with other LF communities, such as O-RAN and Nephio SDNC enhancements (which is used by O-RAN OAM as is) Resource-based Orchestration Pattern (leveraging CD and Operator) Energy saving / monitoring
Ensure the security of ONAP components and operations Define a secure LFN CI/CD pipeline by leveraging OpenSSF-associated reference tools
|
Operations (40 minutes)
| TSC Activities and Deadlines | | |
|---|
PTL Updates | | 12 issuesRefresh Note: PTLs, thank you very much for closing the package update. Note: SO, SDC, MultiCloud and DCAE (without PTLs) are open; DT offered their help on SDC, MultiCloud and DCAE. Thank you very much!!! Note: I will contact Seshu for the SO. |
| | @Fiete Ostkamp, reported that UUI still depends on MSB; @Byung-Woo Jun,sent email to @Keguang He for their plans to resolve the issues. @Fiete Ostkamp, fixed UUI (frontend), working on the backend. @Andreas Geißler, may need to clean up OOM for this after UUI update.
@Fiete Ostkamp, also reported some parts of AAI still use MSB.
|
Oslo Release Status | | |
Paris Release Status | | The next Paris release schedule is TSC approved on Dec 5, 2024 , Release Planning: Paris TSC approved the current Paris release schedule on December 5th An ArgoCD deployment to provide an alternative the helm deployment RAN Simulator enhancement Policy-OPA-PDP MAAS SDC Ruby upgrade Project package upgrade SDNC/CCSDK - need to upgrade Java 21 and Maven ; PTL, SECCOM and ARCCOM will handle this not only SDNC, may be other components too. SECCOM will discuss
Long Term Release Roadmap
|
GoLang Job issues | | https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-27520 - waiting for Murali - on hold Error in Creating Releng Go Jobs as per guide @Kevin Sandi, is working on it and waiting for Murali's input What is the current status? almost done by @Kevin Sandi. Deena, Murali and Kevin need to work together to finalize it. Requesting guidance on adding goLang based project to Nexus IQ - Project Services Support - Service Project (IT-27561) - In Progress, https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-27561 @Kevin Sandi, New JJB template for Golang CLM scan is ready for review and approval => https://gerrit.linuxfoundation.org/infra/c/releng/global-jjb/+/73372 , once that change is approved and merged by LF we can proceed to upgrade the GlobalJJB version at ONAP and then merge following change IT-27720; @Kevin Sandi, will check https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-27696 , Kevin will check https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/ci-management/+/139794 @Ramesh Murugan Iyer, Policy team will check vulnerabilities on direct dependencies; may need to open a ticket for the product (Sonatype) company; @Kevin Sandi, asked Murali to send the test results before raising tickets; CycloneDX-based SBOM; may need a conversion between CycloneDX and SPDX; So far, LFN supports SPDX only for their pipeline SBOM. SECCOM will discuss it further with the LF team. We need a conversion between CycloneDX and SPDX. @Deena Mukundan, Policy Staging job for imaging - will discuss more at the PTL next week
|
Subcommittee UpdatesArch, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements | | ARCCOM plans to work on the ONAP marketing catch points and architecture for the Paris release. PTLs, please plan for the ARCCOM reviews for your new features, requirements and enhancements for Paris. More ONAP Streamlining documentation, ONAP Streamlining Evolution and its sub-wiki pages.
|
SECCOM | | SECCOM will review the Java 21, Python, and Maven upgrades from the security perspective. How to deal with vulnerabilities. e.g., SDC, UUI - Angular dependency issues. Also, MPM SECCOM plans to discuss these issues with PTLs at the next SECCOM meeting (next SECCOM meeting 2/4/2025)
|
Events & Meetings (5 minutes) | Upcoming Events & Housekeeping | | |