2019-10-16 Policy Bi-Weekly Meeting (shared with CLAMP)
AGENDA
Duration | Agenda Item | Requested by | Notes / Links |
---|---|---|---|
START RECORDING | |||
CLAMP Update | CLAMP Team | ||
Policy Team | |||
Epics - do overall planning | Policy Team | ||
Policy Notification Update discussion | Policy Team |
ATTENDEES
NOTES
- CLAMP update
- El Alto update
- Frankfurt
- El Alto branch created
- AAF work
- DCAE self-serve CL - finalizing
- CDS will start development - Vidya
- Rashmi question: CDS work who is identified to work on it? So far Vidya. Others from Huawei may help.
- Policy Scrum (see wiki)
- Policy Epic review
- Question: Should the PDP continue to run if for multiple policies being deployed and one or more fails? ex: if 10 are loaded and 5 fail to load
- Drools continues to run
- XACML continue to run
- The PAP makes the decision to put a PDP into PASSIVE mode if there are failures. eg the User makes the call to undeploy
- PDP's report what policies succeeded and failed
- R6 Dmaap Notification of Policy Update
- For Policy Update - need to add complexity of multiple PDP groups. How does the client know which group?
- Agree to just get the first cut done and address this later. Perhaps in G Release.
- For Policy Update - need to add complexity of multiple PDP groups. How does the client know which group?