ONAP R8 Resource IM Call 2021-3-15
General Information:
Date and Time: 2021, March 15th, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 8am~9am US Eastern
Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/97595070639
Meeting Recording:
Meeting Chat Log:
Agenda:
Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
Model Proposals
allotted resource - 0 minutes
5G service - 0 minutes
ETSI CNF support - 20 minutes
PNF instance model - 0 minutes
CPS model - 0 minutes
Topology model - 20 minutes
Modeling Documentation - 0 minutes
Material:
Model proposals:
Modeling requirements:
Related information:
Clean/Approved models:
Minutes:
Agenda bashing
reminder for filling R9 high level requirements: https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/ONAP+R9+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements
Model Proposals
ETSI support for CNF model
R9 DM proposal: https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16463007
aligned with SOL001 v4.2.1
question about version alignment: IM aligned with v4.1.1, DM aligned with v4.2.1, shall the IM be revisited?
the answer is yes, but the changes are very minor for the time being
no major structure change for the VNFD compared to previous DM proposal
MciopProfile renamed to Mciop, now a dedicated node type under VNF, still reference Helm Chart
OsContainerGroup renamed to OsContainerDeployableUnit, stands for a Pod, and still reference to individual OsContainer(s)
no changes for VirtualCp node type
minor changes for node and data type definitions
TOSCA example will be available on the wiki page later
package format
use non-MANO artifact to describe Helm Charts
discussion is still ongoing
5G service / CPS model
PNF instance model
Topology model
Proposal: https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/Abstract+Topology+Model
call information: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-modelingsub/topic/abstract_topology_model/80876474?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,80876474
today, 15:00 UTC (1 hour earlier than last week)
investigating whether can reuse the TAPI (ONAP transport API) topology model
Modeling Documentation
R6 readthedocs review:
gendoc template improvement: ONAP Information Model - Gendoc Examples
discussion whether the description only applies for a navigatable end of an association
continue discussion later
add relationship documentation to the UML guideline: ONAPMODEL-28: Using the Documentation Property for RelationshipsOpen
UML principle wiki page:
Principle and Guideline for Information Model Proposal Using Papyrus (Draft)
review the updates to the Gendoc requirements part
Michela suggest whether it's possible to add information of associations into the class definitions
Xu will investigate it offline
Using Papyrus for Modeling updates
suggest to further discuss the version recommended after Jacqueline come back