SDC R4 Release Planning

Owned by Ofir Sonsino
Last updated: Jan 29, 2019
5 min read

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.


Overview

Project Name

Enter the name of the project

Project Name

Enter the name of the project

Target Release Name

Dublin

Project Lifecycle State

Incubation

Participating Company 

Amdocs, AT&T, ZTE, Huawei, Intel, Nokia, Ericsson, Iconectiv, Vodafone, IBM, TechM

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Describe the problem being solved by this release

Use Cases

Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer use case).

Minimum Viable Product

SDC:

deliver all the need dockers and DB needed to support sdc functionality and the needed scripts for deploying it in HEAT heat and in OOM.

WORKFLOW:

deliver all the need dockers needed to support workflow designer functionality and the needed scripts for deploying it in HEAT heat and in OOM.

DCAE-DS:

deliver all the need dockers needed to support dcae-ds functionality and the needed scripts for deploying it in HEAT heat and in OOM.

SDC SDK's:

sdc-destribution-client

sdc-tosca

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Refresh

Stories

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Refresh



Longer term roadmap

SDC aims to position itself as the main design IDE in ONAP. SDC works towards creating a fully model-driven design experience.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

SDC Docker Images

To fill out

SDC TOSCA SDK

JAR file

SDC







Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

  • Jtosca

  • SDC Tosca

  • SDC Distribution Client

  • SDC base docker

  • SDC titan cassandra

  • SDC workflow designer 

  • DCAE-DS

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

Area

Actual Level

Targeted Level for current Release

How, Evidences

Comments

Area

Actual Level

Targeted Level for current Release

How, Evidences

Comments

Performance

0

0



  • 0 -- none

  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured

  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented

Stability

1

1



  • 0 – none

  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions

  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions

  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate

Resiliency

1

1

+AAF integration and https support



  • 0 – none

  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)

  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)

  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)

Security

1

1



  • 0 – none

  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage

  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls

  • 3 – CII Gold

Scalability

0

0



  • 0 – no ability to scale

  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling

  • 2 – geographic scaling

  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances

Manageability

1

1



  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour

  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management

Usability

1

1



  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation

  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation



  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

Portal

user management APIs

api for user management

delivered

exposed by portal sdk

Destribution client

apis for retriving artifacts from catalog

download artifacts

delivered

exposed by sdc part of external apis.

  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

dmaap

using Cambria client

api for pushing and retrieving notifications

delivered

sdk

  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

Name

Description

Version

Name

Description

Version

Cassandra

Open-source distributed storage system

2.1.19

Docker

VM container



ElasticSearch

Search framework

2.4.6

titan

Open-source, distributed graph database

1.0.0

Jetty

Open-source application server

9.3.X

Ubuntu

Open-source software operating system

16.0.4-LTS

kibana

analytic disply server

4.3.3

vnc

vnc server used for ui testing

ubuntu-xfce-vnc:1.3.0

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

  • TESTING AND INTEGRATION PLANS

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

  • validate uses cases and pairwise testing of SDC with other components

  • enhance CSIT to include more tests

  • GAPS

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identified

Impact

Gaps identified

Impact

N/A

N/A

  • KNOWN DEFECTS AND ISSUES

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Refresh

  • RISKS

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identified

Mitigation Plan

Contingency Plan

Risk identified

Mitigation Plan

Contingency Plan

To fill out

To fill out

To fill out

  • RESOURCES

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • RELEASE MILESTONE

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • TEAM INTERNAL MILESTONE

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

Date

Project

Deliverable

Date

Project

Deliverable

To fill out

To fill out

To fill out

  • DOCUMENTATION, TRAINING

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).

  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset

  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.

  • Documentation includes items such as:

    • Installation instructions

    • Configuration instructions

    • Developer guide

    • End User guide

    • Admin guide

    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.



Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.