Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Overview


Project Name

Enter the name of the project

Target Release NameHonolulu
Project Lifecycle StateMature
Participating Company China Mobile, Huawei,China Telecom

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

The Usecase-UI Honolulu release has following primary objectives:

1. Supporting use cases identified by ONAP and integration:

E2E Network Slicing: KPI Monitoring and enhancement of endpoint design

Smart Operator Intent Translation: multiply methods of creating 5G service slicing based on IBN


2. UUI enhancement and new  features:

JDK upgrade evaluate and migrate (Depend on the commit resource) and Upgrade PostgreSQL: USECASEUI-405 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Removed GPLv3 from the  dockers built by the ONAP community:  USECASEUI-494 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Organize the existed API, clarify the data format and parameter of them and delete the useless ones:  USECASEUI-506 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Use Cases

Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer use case).

R8 E2E Network Slicing use case

Smart Operator Intent Translation in UUI based on IBN - R8 5G Slicing Support

Requirements

Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer requirements).

Support endpoint design enhancement:   REQ-440 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Support for Intent-based Network:   REQ-453 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Minimum Viable Product

Usecase-UI will include the necessary subcomponents supporting the primary objectives: supporting the use cases and meeting platform maturity goals.

  1. UUI BE Component  for supporting KPI Monitoring, 5G Slicing enhancement and IBN input
  2. UUI FE Component  for supporting KPI Monitoring, 5G Slicing enhancement and IBN input
  3. UUI NLP Component for supporting the smart operator intent translation based on IBN

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh


Stories

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Longer term roadmap

Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note, etc) of this release.

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

Source CodeSource code for all UUI components
Maven ArtifactsMaven Artifacts for all UUI components
Docker ContainersDocker container  associated with UUI components
DocumentationUUI detailed documentation

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.

Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Platform Maturity

Please fill out the centralized wiki page: Honolulu Release Platform Maturity

API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

Portal Platform APIAPI for integration of portal applications


Catalog API (SDC)

API to read the NS and VNF Catalog




SO API(Modeling)

API for NS instantiation and termination




MSB API

API for registration and use of micro-services bus



Microservice Bus API Documentation

A&AI API

API for getting inventory and image management



AAI REST API Documentation
VF-C APIAPI for NS instantiation and termination


DataLake APIAPI for FCAPS (VNF/VM monitoring)


External APIAPI for external data


API Outgoing Dependencies

None

Third Party Products Dependencies

None.

Testing and Integration Plans

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identified

Impact



Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.



Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identified

Mitigation Plan

Contingency Plan

To fill outTo fill outTo fill out


Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

Date

Project

Deliverable





Documentation, Training

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
  • Documentation includes items such as:
    • Installation instructions
    • Configuration instructions
    • Developer guide
    • End User guide
    • Admin guide
    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.

  • No labels