Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Current »

Date

 | 9am PST |  noon EST | 17:00 UTC | 18:00 CET | 21:30 IST 

Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/436210993

Attendees


Informed

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
00:00Admin

Next meetings: 

2020-12-09: Martin Skorupski John Keeney (Ericsson EST)

2020-12-16: ???

2020-12-23: canceled 

2020-12-30: canceled

2021-01-06: Martin Skorupski

00:05O-RAN-SCO-RAN-SC PTLs

Status reports:

OSC Cherry Rapidly approaching! (Release early Dec)!


  • Non-RT-RIC:

    • Please come along to OSC NONRTRIC Cherry Demo:
    • Continuing with Cherry Release Prep.
    • Pushing with Integration & Deployment tasks with Felix in OOSC Integration team.
    • ONAP Honolulu reqmnt for A1 Policy functions approved through ONAP ArchCom & PTL approved. M1 expected 7thJan
    • Claudio David Gasparini Question about reuse of ONAP code in OSC at OSC TOC call: John Keeney No issue found. If there is a later divergence we will work it out then
    • Claudio David Gasparini Same for ONF? John Keeney Don't know. Have had no communications. Would welcome working together if its useful. Hopefully divergence can be avoided.
  • SMO:
  • SIM:
  • OAM:
00:21Use Case

ONAP H M1 extension ... 7th January?

  • ONAP Usecases:
  • ONAP Slicing Usecase:
    • Swaminathan S Hope to use the A1 interface to nearRTRIC. Come along to ONAP Slicing use case call for more info.
    • John Keeney WHich nearRTRIC will you use in that use case: Swaminathan S Not decided yet, maybe Simulator or OSC nearRTRIC.
    • John Keeney How would a nearRTRIC/RAN-CNF be deployed / stood-up? SDC, Orchestrator. Swaminathan S in Guilin all NFs are already up & running. May move to dynamic instantiation etc in Honolulu. Lots to do for modelling too in H for RU/DU/CU. Also Midhaul & Fronthaul & would need to interact with transport slicing functions .... TBC
    • Swaminathan S Will demo slicing in early Jan. Would be great to engage O-RAN folks there.
    • Swaminathan S Looking for update on Yang Model ... (Please confirm with Martin Skorupski & O-RAN WG1 team).
    • Swaminathan S Any plans in OSC for Slicing? John Keeney Don't think there is a plan in OSC Dawn to look at slicing. Will of course touch base if there is
  • ONAP SON use case
    • Swaminathan S Currently SON has PCI & ANR SON functions. A simulator exists if useful for OSC. 
    • John Keeney Any plan to make the SON use case more general for other usecases? If so any way it would align with Control-Loop/Apps in ONAP or rApps in OSC?
      • Swaminathan S Should be possible for other use cases to add their own use cases following SON/Control-loop approach. Will add more usecases if they drive platform capabilities forward.
      • Swaminathan S Also hope to look at control loop interactions (Paused since Frankfurt). Also hopw to look at ML-based SON.
      • John Keeney Sounds like good options for alignment. Let's keep doors open

Please see:  Potential ONAP <-> O-RAN collaboration use cases

00:40Closed loop use cases in OSCJohn Keeney (Ericsson EST)


00:45Other
  • Lasse Kaihlavirta CSIT in ONAP ... Disaggregating CSIT many CSIT functions out to individual projects & more granular. John Keeney Great. A1 Policy functions need to & will align more towards this in ONAP H.

00:55

END




(From last week: Michela Bevilacqua Liam Fallon will revert about a quick demo for TOSCA Defined Control Loop PoC in ONAP & TOSCA Defined Control Loop: Architecture and Design in coming weeks (smile) )


Action items


  • No labels