Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Please add yourself. Thanks!
See also
Goals
- share information between
- O-RAN-SC Non-RT-RIC
- O-RAN-SC OAM
- O-RAN-SC SMO
- ONAP CCSDK/SDNC/SDN-R
- LFN
Recording
link to the zoom (mp4 format)
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
00:00 | Admin | | Next meeting: 2020-11-04 Summer time ends in NorthAmerica Sunday 01-11-2020 16:00 UTC / 8am PST/ 11:am EST / 17:00 CET - usually in summer 17:00 UTC / 9am PST/ noon EST / 18:00 CET - usually in winter |
00:10 | O-RAN-SC | O-RAN-SC PTLs | Status reports: - SMO:
- ref definition using ONAP tools for packages
- YANG test infrastructure deployed in BedminsterLab
- Non-RT-RIC:
- A1 enrichment info
- extending A1-sim
- R1 app catalog - inti version
- SIM:
- see YANG part of SMO
- TOC: copyright issue - are we allowed deploy yang models.
- OAM:
- see YANG part of SMO
- review of O-DU O1 implementation
|
00:20 | Calender | | Martin – 1 point: Based on the recent guidelines from LFN, we should enable password/passcode, and also waiting room for zoom meetings. Let’s discuss this also in the call today. |
00:25 | Use Case | | Use Cases Please see page #2 for details: 5G Use Cases in R7 Guilin. - very first view - to be discussed further: - BULK PM –PM control
- 100% aligned with O-RAN interface specification; use case was demonstrated several times
proposal: Check updates of 3GPP pm xml file format and updates of VES messages
- OOF -SON PCI (5G)
- 5G SERVICE MODELING & DEFINITION (5G)
- CONFIGURATION & PERSISTENCY SERVICE
- use VES 7.2 - reference will be in O-RAN specs.
- use 3GPP NRM - see https://forge.3gpp.org/rep/sa5/MnS/
- open: is the abstraction by 3GPP and O-RAN sufficient for all the targeted use case - how do µServices, rApps make use of C&PS, if C&PS is device model driven and not service model driven?
- xNF LICENSING MANAGEMENT
- not subject of O-RAN (yet)
- proposal: defer or contribute terms, definitions, specifications to O-RAN
- ONAP/3GPP & ORAN Alignment
- O-RAN O1 data models are augmenting 3GPP data models
- A1, R1, O2 data models are subject of O-RAN only
- ONAP/ORAN Alignment -A1 adapter
- 5G NRM (CM)
- CM is part of O-RAN OAM Architecture and OAM interface specification
proposal: as a staring point the 3GPP NRM yang models V16.0.5 from July 2020 should be used - for VES the version 7.2 is specified. TODO: Add link to 3GPP
- E2E NETWORK SLICING (5G Use Case)
- Network Slicing is not part of 3GPP NRM so far
proposal: waiting for 3GPP and O-RAN specifications
|
00:30 |
| | POD (Policy-Management-Service) restart required for Guilin |
00:59 |
| | Questions and Answers - Non-RT-RIC realted - wiki are on the way to be updated
- for O-RAN-SC using DMaaP
|
END
Backup |
|
|
|
00:00 |
| @all | Closer collaboration related to use cases Please follow: |
00:00 |
| @Mahesh | Application Package Structure |
00:10 |
| Mahesh | Postman scripts to interface with the SMO and in turn test O1 interface between the SMO and different parts of O-RAN instances of O-CU, O-DU, O-RU and RIC using these models. - yang modules
- framework for test and validate CM
share content in in SMO gerrit and create wiki linking to the same source - Working on a framework for vendors for OAM/YANG tests
- O-RAN-SC to host the framework
- Postman and vsCode as RestClients
- Alex about to setup a SIM in OSC lab - involve Rittwik in a O-RAN private lab
- OpenFronthaul
- 3GPP models are considered.
Feedback from Rittwik - SMO in T-Labs
- how to run Netopeer server - req to Felix (O-RAN-SC INT PTL)
- Alex asked for VMs
Init script (Postman) for O-RAN OAM FH M-Plane (o-ran-interface.yang augmenting ) interface demoed RFC8040 (RestConf by IETF) support supported by ODL |
00:25 |
| | Konrad is absent this week. The presentation will be made when Konrad is available. O-RAN Component deployment The question is: How to deploy the red colored CNFs/VNFs of the O-RAN-Architecture? - CNF for O-RAN-components
- model of CNF - how to be configured, how many components, blueprints
- CDS model needs to be created
- Network-service based on several CNFs
- CNF types
- Near-RT-RIC
- O-CU-UP
- O-CU-CP
- O-DU
For detailed discussion the following page was created:
Package - for Network Functions (priority)
- for Network Service (second step)
CNFs or VNFs - both should be considered
- let's start with CNFs first
- VNF is considered as additional option
- no CNFs and VNFs combined in a single package
- maybe not for rApps →
- VNF should take care about internal CNFs
|
Action items