Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 22 Next »


Support for the Multi Tenancy in ONAP

Key Contacts - Seshu Kumar Mudiganti Olivier Phenix

Guilin Proposed Requirements - Multi-tenancy v2.2.pdf

Executive Summary - Provide the multi tenant non-functional support in ONAP

  • As a starting point tenant wise runtime operations could be differed for each tenant. 

Business Impact - Enables operators and service providers to use leverage ONAP  

Business Markets - All operators and service providers can leverage the multi-tenancy functionality of ONAP 

Funding/Financial Impacts - Reduction in operations expense from using industry standard Interfaces.

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


Documenting ONAP APIs

Key Contacts -  Andy Mayer

Guilin Proposed Requirements 

Also see: Developing ONAP API Documentation

Executive Summary - Improve ONAP API Documentation:

  • Developer Friendly
  • Non-Developer Friendly
  • Easy to Find & Easy to Navigate
  • Common and Uniform Documentation Structure and Approach
  • Provides Information on Using the API (e.g., quick start)
  • Try It For Yourself (TIFY) Examples

Proposed non-functional requirements for Guilin release:

  1. All components should place externally facing (i.e. interfaces exposed by the ONAP component to either other ONAP components or components external to ONAP) API definitions (e.g. Swagger) in a common path within their Gerrit/Git 
    Suggested Path: <Component>/docs/api/swagger/
  2. Apply ReDoc to Swagger and place HTML in Readthedocs for the release
  3. Apply Minimum (Phase 1+) swagger guidelines

    1. See: Proposed Phase 1+ OpenAPI 2.0 / Swagger Style Guide
    2. Use the common insert for the info section (e.g., license info, contact info, etc): Swagger Insert Sample for Info Section

Related JIRAs under the Documentation project for the API Documentation non-functional requirements:

Epic: https://jira.onap.org/browse/DOC-608

User Story: https://jira.onap.org/browse/DOC-609

User Story: https://jira.onap.org/browse/DOC-610

User Story: https://jira.onap.org/browse/DOC-611

Business Impact - Enables developers, operators and service providers to use leverage ONAP; Improve integration velocity for API client developers; Ease development handoffs; 

Business Markets - All  developers,operators and service providers can leverage ONAP APIs 

Funding/Financial Impacts - Reduction in development and integration expense from using well defined open Interfaces.

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


Deterministic ONAP installation result

slides: 20200511.ONAP.relG.TIM.non functional requirements.v2.pptx

Key Contacts - Alessandro D'Alessandromarco.signorelli@telecomitalia.it

Executive Summary - ONAP code stability is steadly improved over the releases. Similarly is being happening for ONAP installation success rate. Anyway while it is recognized the OOM project efforts in providing an automation tool for ONAP installation, it is evident that further efforts are required among the ONAP projects to provide an overall solution that bring to a deterministic installation result.

Proposed non-functional requirements for Guiling release:

  1. ONAP installation result shall be determinstic at k8s level with 99% success rate  (e.g. all POD are up and running)
  2. ONAP installation result shall be deterministic at functional level with 97% success rate (e.g. all functional modules are up and running, APIs are responsiveness, etc)
  3. ONAP installation result shall be determinstic at service level with 95% success rate (e.g. a service can be designed, distributed and deployed successfully)
  4. Same requirements shall apply when one or more ONAP functional modules are re-installed

     

Business Impact - Enables operators and service providers opex saving  

Business Markets - All operators and service providers can leverage the benefit of a deterministic installation 

Funding/Financial Impacts - Reduction in operations expense 

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


ONAP projects shall upgrade all outdated, vulnerable direct dependencies in their code base

Key Contacts -  Amy Zwarico Paweł Pawlak

Executive Summary - All ONAP projects shall reduce the risks associated with software vulnerabilities in the ONAP code base by upgrading all outdated, vulnerable direct dependencies in their code bases following the recommendations of SECCOM. The project and repo specific recommendations are provided in the Security Vulnerability space.

Business Impact - Improves the security posture of ONAP. 

Business Markets - All operators and service providers can leverage the of fewer vulnerabilities in the open source dependencies in ONAP

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


ONAP projects shall define code coverage improvements and achieve at least 55% code coverage

Key Contacts -  Amy Zwarico Paweł Pawlak

Executive Summary - Each project written in Java, Python or Javascript must provide the planned percent improvement in code coverage by M2 and meet the planned improvement by M4. Code coverage for each project must be at least 55% of the code base.

Business Impact - Improves the security posture of ONAP by improving the testing suite. 

Business Markets - All operators and service providers can use the automated test suites in their own environments

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


ONAP shall increase the number of security tests performed during integration testing

Key Contacts -  Amy Zwarico Krzysztof Opasiak Sylvain Desbureaux

Executive Summary - Integration testing shall continue to test for unsecure communication (HTTP) and vulnerable ports (e.g., JDWP). Integration shall add tests to ensure that project containers use the versions of Java, Python, Linux, Docker, database and utilities specified in Guilin versions.

Business Impact - Improves the security posture of ONAP by using current versions and simplifies the deployment. 

Business Markets - All operators and service provider.

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


ONAP shall increase the number of Docker Benchmark tests

Key Contacts -  Amy Zwarico Krzysztof Opasiak Sylvain Desbureaux

Executive Summary - Integration testing shall include tests that a non-root user for the container has been created, containers use only trusted base images (versions specified on Guilin versions), and HEALTHCHECK instructions have been added to container images.

Business Impact - Improves the security posture of ONAP by hardening containers. 

Business Markets - All operators and service provider.

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


ONAP must complete update of the java language (from v8 -> v11) 

Key Contacts -  Amy Zwarico Paweł Pawlak

Executive Summary - All ONAP projects using java shall reduce the risks associated with no regular support for java v8 software as it causes increase of usage risk, as recommended by SECCOM. 

Business Impact - Improves the security posture of ONAP. 

Business Markets - All operators, service providers and entities using ONAP.  

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


ONAP must complete update of the Python language (from 2.7 -> 3.8)

Key Contacts -  Amy Zwarico Paweł Pawlak

Executive Summary - All ONAP projects using Python shall reduce the risks associated with no community support for Python 2.7 software as it causes increase of usage risk, as recommended by SECCOM. 

Business Impact - Improves the security posture of ONAP. 

Business Markets - All operators, service providers and entities using ONAP.  

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


ONAP shall use STDOUT for logs collection

Key Contacts -  Amy Zwarico Paweł Pawlak

Executive Summary - All ONAP projects should use a common place for logs data - all applications should generate logs that can be collected by Kubernetes in STDOUT, as recommended by SECCOM. 

Business Impact - Improves the security posture of ONAP. 

Business Markets - All operators, service providers and entities using ONAP.  

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies -There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


ONAP Minimum Viable Product (MVP) must be defined

Key Contacts -  rouzaut Natacha Mach

Executive Summary - . a subset of ONAP components should be identified - handling a minimum level of functionnality. This subset would consist in an ONAP baseline.

Business Impact - guarantees a minimum security level for this ONAP subset for each release ensuring a robust basis on which services can be developped.

Business Markets All operators, service providers and entities using ONAP.  

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


Flow management must be activated for ONAP.

Key Contacts -  rouzaut Natacha Mach

Executive Summary - Full map of all the flows - before deploying ONAP in any actor's infrastructure should be defined: protocol type, ports open/closed  with primary focus on outside of ONAP as an ingress.

Business Impact - flow management could then be controlled before any deployment.

Business Markets All operators, service providers and entities using ONAP.  

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 


ONAP must implement IAM solutions.

Key Contacts -  rouzaut Natacha Mach

Executive Summary - a centralized user access management solution should be proposed, so that any project relies on it. 

Business Impact - common user management solution among projects, with respect of security requirements that will be defined.

Business Markets All operators, service providers and entities using ONAP.  

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 

ONAP projects must use only approved and verified base images for their containers

Key Contacts -  Krzysztof Opasiak cl664y@att.com

Executive Summary - We are shipping container images as our official release artifacts. We need to make sure that we comply with all licenses used in base images. This infeasible when projects use dozen of different base images.

Business Impact - Lack of license compliance may limit ONAP adoption and lead to bad perception in the open source community.

Business Markets All operators, service providers and entities using ONAP.  

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 

ONAP container repository must not contain upstream docker images

Key Contacts -  Krzysztof Opasiak cl664y@att.com

Executive Summary - Uploading docker images to nexus means that we are distributing it. Distributing image means that we need to do license check for them. To avoid this extra work all upstream components (databases etc) should be downloaded directly from dockerhub

Business Impact - Lack of license compliance may limit ONAP adoption and lead to bad perception in the open source community.

Business Markets All operators, service providers and entities using ONAP.  

Funding/Financial Impacts - N/A

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this requirement outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. 

  • No labels