Date
Attendees
- Tony Finnerty
- Joanne Liu Rudel
- Munir Ahmad
- Mike Elliott
- Marc-Alexandre Choquette Marc-Alexandre Choquette
- Zu Qiang
- marge.hillis
- kingsly.lawrence
- Junfeng Wang
- N. K. Shankar
- Marci Haas
- Catalyst8 - Fred Feisullin
- --
ARCH WORK
ARCHITECTURE WORK | WIKI LINK |
ARCHITECTURE FLOWS | ARCHCOM: InfoFlow - RunTime Config DB Information Flow |
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION | ARC RunTime DB Component Description - R6 Frankfurt |
PROJECT PROPOSAL | RunTime Config DB Project Proposal (Oct 25 2019) |
DISCUSSION
Topic | Discussion |
---|---|
Calendar Entry | Not showing up in the community calendar. I've contact LF-Help desk, Kenny (no response) ... groups.io (request) |
R6 CCSDK-based Solution | Project as part of CCSDK ( Yuriy Malakov )
|
R6 | In release requirements page: M4 March 5, 2020 Frankfurt Release Requirements (TSC has already approved Green status for U/C). CCSDK, SDN-C - Dan Timoney MVP (min viab. product) discussed on SDN-C call. Req not totally clear, schema model. Take what is in ConfigDB; finalize the Data Model approach. MEETINGS HELD RTCfgDB in CCSDK CCSDK, SDN-C call - ConfigDB is already part of DBaaS. Req not finalized. Data model already in use. and API creation.
|
R7 Project Proposal | RunTime Config DB Project Proposal (Oct 25 2019) Project Proposal work to be done during R6. Project Proposal for R7. Presentation at Arch S/C and TSC during R6.
|
R7 Separate Component |
Email from Dan Timoney My understanding from Sandeep was that this work was very much a stretch for Frankfurt. So, I’m okay with work starting in Frankfurt, as long as its structured so that it’s a separable component (i.e. as long as, if it’s not completed in Frankfurt, the platform is not fundamentally broken). I would NOT support creating a separate repository, since there is a fair amount of overhead involved in maintaining each repository on an ongoing basis – both machine and human resources. The Linux Foundation itself has been pushing back on the number of repositories the ONAP projects have and there is now a new approval process needed in order to add new ones. If a new repository is needed, then this team will need to convince me why no existing repository can be used AND will need to provide a resource who is willing to maintain that repository (i.e dealing with security vulnerabilities; policing code coverage ; doing release builds, etc). |
SUPPORTING FILES
Description | File |
---|---|
VES Event Listener Draft 4 Version 7.1.1 | |
OOF SON PCI Usage of RtCfg DB |
RECORDING
Recording | File |
---|---|
Zoom | |
Audio Only | |
Chat |