| Project Name | Project Tech. Lead | Models and API Specs | IM Category | Existing Model | Gap | Modeling Priority | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A & AI | AAI REST API Documentation - Dublin | resource & service | 1.VNF instance model is documented in R3: R3 Resource Clean Draft (Papyrus Based) 2. R3 Service Model &R3 Network Service Model | AAI model contains more models than those currently documented | High | |
| 2 | Application Authorization Framework | AAF RESTful API Docs - Realtime (WinRiver) | TBD | ||||
| 3 | APPC | APPC provides one single definition for API: APPC uses Yang model to define LCM Action: Yang Model for LCM Action for payload. APPC uses swagger 1.2 apidoc that provided by ODL ( see some sample links in APPC WindRiverLab ) APPC does not use TOSCA model in R4. | resource | none | |||
| 4 | CLAMP | CLAMP teams plans on providing the information | resource/common? | none | |||
| 5 | Common Controller SDK | In progress | resource | none | |||
| 6 | DCAE | Datamodel used by DCAE service components is VES https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/dcaegen2.git/docs/sections/apis/inventory.html https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/dcaegen2.git/docs/sections/apis/dcaecdap.html https://git.onap.org/dcaegen2/services/prh/tree/swagger.yaml https://git.onap.org/dcaegen2/collectors/ves/tree/swagger_vescollector_1.3.1.yaml https://git.onap.org/dcaegen2/platform/configbinding/tree/app/app/swagger.yaml RESTConf - https://git.onap.org/dcaegen2/collectors/restconf/tree/swagger_restconfcollector_1.0.0.yaml | common | VES model to be documented in R5: VES 7.1 | |||
| 7 | DMaaP | waiting on modeling team. | TBD | ||||
| 8 | Documentation | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
| 9 | External API Framework | Each API resources is documented with swagger, as json or yaml, and each data model is also described as plantuml and xml schemas Here the master readthedoc sources ( not yet build and available online ) https://git.onap.org/externalapi/nbi/tree/docs/offeredapis/api_serviceOrder https://git.onap.org/externalapi/nbi/tree/docs/offeredapis/api_hub https://git.onap.org/externalapi/nbi/tree/docs/offeredapis/api_serviceInventory https://git.onap.org/externalapi/nbi/tree/docs/offeredapis/api_status | currently service | service order | no models accepted for service inventory | Medium | |
| 10 | Holmes | The data models are described inside the API doc: Holmes API Documentation - Dublin Also, you could find the corresponding Swagger files here: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=holmes/rule-management.git;a=blob;f=api/swagger.json https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=holmes/engine-management.git;a=blob;f=api/swagger.json | TBD | ||||
| 11 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||
| 12 | Including POMBA | No swagger API data | TBD (common?) | none | |||
| 13 | Microservices Bus | Microservice Bus API Documentation | TBD | ||||
| 14 | Modeling | None | N/A | N/A | |||
| 15 | Multi VIM/Cloud | Need to add Modeling checklist item | Infrastructure | ||||
| 16 | MUSIC | https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/31127/2/swagger.json | TBD | ||||
| 17 | ONAP CLI | Need to update the checklist including Modeling | TBD | ||||
| 18 | ONAP Operations Manager | OOM provides no external API's. | N/A | N/A | |||
| 19 | ONAP Optimization Framework | API models has been documented in swagger. However, OOF is indirectly consuming service and data models, especially for the service instantiation workflows, either directly (by querying AAI, MultiCloud) or indirectly (Policy, SO). Components like OSDF and HAS captures this information in their internal models that may have different terminologies - CMSO: CM Ticket Management API Swagger Change Management (CM) Schedule Optimizer API Swagger HAS: OSDF: | TBD Potential related to service and resource, need to discuss with SO and OOF team | ||||
| 20 | ONAP Usecase UI | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
| 21 | Policy Framework | Policy Design and API Flow for Model Driven Control Loop | common | policy model (draft in R4): Policy Draft | policy framework has updated their model in R4 | ||
| 22 | Portal Platform | Need to update the checklist including Integration & Modeling Checklist items https://docs.onap.org/en/beijing/submodules/portal.git/docs/platform/offeredapis.html | N/A | N/A | |||
| 23 | SDN-C | In Progress | resource | none | |||
| 24 | Service Design & Creation | No Template https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/sdc.git/docs/offeredapis.html | resource&service | onboarding VNFD model documented in R4: Updated V2.5.1 VNFD Model onboarding PNFD model documented in R4: Agreed PNFD Model service descriptor, composite service structure: service model with filter mechanism: Enhanced Service Information Model for Nested and Shared Services | Heat model not documented Need comparision between current composite model and SDC model. Kevin Scaggs Ofir Sonsino | High for Service model | |
| 25 | Service Orchestrator | https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/so.git/docs/api/offered_consumed_apis.html | service | service descriptor, composite service structure: service order: | SO hasn't supported composite service model. | High | |
| 26 | VF-C: Virtual Function Controller | To Do | resource | onboarding VNFD model documented in R4: Updated V2.5.1 VNFD Model VNF instance model is documented in R3: R3 Resource Clean Draft (Papyrus Based) | |||
| 27 | VID project | No Template https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/vid.git/docs/offeredapis.html | service&resource | none | |||
| 28 | VNF SDK | VNFSDK use ONAP R4+ Onboarding PNFD based on ETSI NFV SOL001 to do the PNF pre-onboarding/validation VNFSDK also use tosca model to do the compliance check. VNFSDK provide the swagger here : Marketplace | resource | onboarding VNFD model documented in R4: Updated V2.5.1 VNFD Model onboarding PNFD model documented in R4: Agreed PNFD Model non-MANO artifact: ONAP Non-MANO Artifacts Set Identifiers | |||
| 29 | VNF Requirements | N/A | TBD | ||||
| 30 | VNF Validation (VVP) | no APIs | resource | none |
General
Content
Integrations