ONAP R6 Modeling High Level Requirements

According to ONAP Frankfurt Release requirement input Frankfurt Release Requirements

Gather requirement: July 1-31

Refine requirement: Aug. 1-31





Reporting on the Frankfurt release to the TSC will begin Aug 22, so the deadline for the input of high level reuiqrement will be Aug 22.

Prioritize & Finalize: Sep. 1-23

before M1: Sep. 23rd , the requirement will be finalized.



There are other 5 categories of high level requirement,

  • 1) Will be implmented in R6 by code commitment to different impacted projects/components. 

  • 2) Will document only for the Frankfurt release.

  • 3) Documentation after implemented in prior release

  • 4) Lower Priority

  • 5) Experimental

The first category is that those requirement will be documented only in Frankfurt release

the second category will document the current implementation in those projects.

Other two categories like lower priority and experimental will not be included in the release 3, the contributor will work with best effort to influence future release.

Owners of each requirement needs to coordinate the modeling spec commitment and code commitment with PTLs of impacted project.



Below High Level Requirements have been agreed by modeling subcommitee with code commitment promise to Frankfurt release, modeling subcommittee request related to projects to approve those related submission.

Category 1) will be implemented in R6

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

Mapping to M1 requirement

Owner

Use Case Owner

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

Mapping to M1 requirement

Owner

Use Case Owner

Service DM



Enhanced Nested and Shared Service Information Model 

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-60

SDC,SO,

OOF,AAI

 

Network Slicing

@guochuyi  

@Borislav Glozman

@Shankaranarayanan Puzhavakath Narayanan

@Swaminathan Seetharaman





 @guochuyi

@Borislav Glozman

@Shankaranarayanan Puzhavakath Narayanan @Swaminathan Seetharaman

Resource IM/DM



RunTime DB U/C: VES Model relations, VES CM model (CM Notify).

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-133

AAI, Controller (RunTime DB component), DCAE

RunTime DB (5G Use Case)

@Kevin Scaggs

@N.K. Shankaranarayanan

@Sandeep Shah







@Joanne Liu Rudel

@Benjamin Cheung

Resource IM/DM 





Software Versions support for PNF S/W Upgrade 

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-88



SDC

PNF S/W Upgrade (PNF Support Use Case)

@Fei Zhang (Ericsson)



@Zu Qiang









@Zu Qiang

Service IM, Resource DM



End to End Layer 1 Service Management. Modeling the Optical Service.



AAIhttps://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/AAI-2623

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-37

Multi-domain Optical Service L0/L1 Orchestration

@Xin Miao (Unlicensed)

@Xin Miao (Unlicensed)







@Raghavan Subramanian

Resource IM/DM



Data type & Node type for 5G NRM.

SDC, SO, CDS

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-49

5G NRM Configuration

@wangyaoguang

@wangyaoguang







@wangyaoguang



Category 2) Will document only for the Frankfurt release



Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

Mapping to M1 requirement

Owner

Use Case Contact

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

Mapping to M1 requirement

Owner

Use Case Contact

Service IM



Enhanced Nested and Shared Service Information Model 

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-60

SDC,SO,

OOF,AAI

Network Slicing

 @guochuyi

documentation only





 @guochuyi

@Borislav Glozman @Shankaranarayanan Puzhavakath Narayanan @Swaminathan Seetharaman

Service IM



End-to-end Network Slicing Information Model

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-60

SDC,SO, SDN-C, OOF,DCAE,

External API,

Network Slicing

@guochuyi

documentation only





@guochuyi

@Swaminathan Seetharaman

@Shankaranarayanan Puzhavakath Narayanan

@Borislav Glozman

Resource IM/DM



GeoLocation Model (and standards harmonization)

Modeling

PNF Plug and Play (PNF Support Use Case)

@Kevin Scaggs

@Jacqueline Beaulac [Ericsson]

documentation only







@Jacqueline Beaulac [Ericsson]

@Benjamin Cheung

Common



Licensing Model Refinement



SDC



Licensing Management

@Kevin Scaggs

@Jacqueline Beaulac [Ericsson]

documentation only







@Samuli Kuusela

@Timo Perala  

Service IM



slice service monitoring KPI

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-146



SDC, DCAE

Vertical Industry Oriented on-demand 5G Slice Service

@guochuyi

documentation only







@LIN MENG

Service IM



SON 'service'

SDC,DCAE,SO

5G OOF SON use case

@Swaminathan Seetharaman

@Former user (Deleted)

documentation only







@N.K. Shankaranarayanan @Swaminathan Seetharaman

Service IM



ORAN & 3GPP Standards Harmonization

SDC, Controller, DCAE, CDS

ORAN & 3GPP Standards Harmonization (5G Use Case)

@Kevin Scaggs

documentation only







@Vimal Begwani

@marge.hillis



Category 3) Documentation after implemented in prior release

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

Mapping to M1 requirement

 Owner

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

Mapping to M1 requirement

 Owner

Common

VES

Add network element status report to assist run time service instance selection.

Related to: DCAE, AAI

Network

Slicing

@Kevin Scaggs

@guochuyi

documentation only







Resource

A&AI reverse engineering

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-170

create runtime information model based on current A&AI schema

Related to: A&AI

PNF Plug&Play

@Jacqueline Beaulac [Ericsson]

@Xu Yang

documentation only







Common

policy model

create policy information model based on implementation of policy project

Related to: Policy, SDC



@Kevin Scaggs

documentation only







Common

license model

create license information model based on SDC implementation

Related to: SDC



@Kevin Scaggs

documentation only







Resource

allotted resource

create allotted resource information model based on SDC implementation

Related to: SDC



@Kevin Scaggs

documentation only









Below tables are not downgrade, but Frankfurt won't make it

Category 4) Lower Priority:

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

 Owner

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

 Owner

Service IM

Service Model

Modeling (exploratory) work for creating a 5G Service

Modeling

5G Service Model Use Case (5G)

@Benjamin Cheung

documentation only



@Benjamin Cheung

@Kevin Scaggs

Service IM



To keep current composite service model align with SDC model, need a comparision and supplement.

SDC









@Kevin Scaggs

Service IM, Resource IM



Network Topology Modeling. Network configuration tree structures.

SO, SDC, AAI, Controllers, ConfigDB

Network Topology Management







@Joanne Liu Rudel



















Category 5) Experimental:

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

 Owner

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

 Owner























Per discussion in Paris, requirements can be based on:

  • Release / project specific needs

  • Recognized 'future' needs

  •  Documenting existing models

Some concepts may be complex enough, if we wait for the release / project requirement, we will be too late to properly develop the concept.