Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.

Info

Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki.
Use the Wiki to document the release plan. Don't provide PowerPoint.
Use as much diagrams and flow charts as you need, directly in the wiki, to convey your message.


Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameDublin
Project Lifecycle StateIncubation
Participating Company AT&T, Intel, OAM Technologies, Orange

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Committed: 

  • F-GPS - Main purpose of F-GPS (a.k.a. ONAP-Valet) is, with considering new placement policies,  to precisely check capacity & capability of target Cloud Region and then, to determine VNF placements (i.e., target zone for each workload (VDU) of VNF).
    Goals 
    • Capacity & Capability checking for an OpenStack cloud: 
    • Checking the number of zones of the target Cloud Region to solve the Anti-affinity rules.
      • Checking available capacity of each zone to solve Affinity rule.
      • Checking available host profiles of each zone to solve flavor matching (i.e., Host-Aggregates) (Stretch Goal).
    • Placement decisions for Affinity and Anti-Affinity among zones of target Cloud Region. Optionally, decisions go into compute hosts (for private cloud case).
    Stretch Goals
    • Defining Affinity and Anti-affinity rules in Policy (Stretch Goal). Until this is ready, evaluate with a manual/hard-coded policy.
    • Specifying Affinity and Anti-affinity rules in homing/placement request (Stretch Goal). Until this is ready, evaluate with a manual/hard-coded specification.
    • Distributed cloud modelling immediately relevant to F-GPS - a single cloud control plane (Cloud Region) to be able manage several distributed DC locations/zones. 
    • Leverage capacity alerts (significant change in capacity) from Model-driven Distributed Analytics work.

  • Policy Tosca model API and ONAP CLI integration
    Goal 
    • Develop APIs in Policy for uploading policy tosca models for OOF.
    • Develop CLI for creating the policies including templates using ONAP CLI project. This will be extremely valuable in automating policy creation, one of the major pain points in Casablanca integration tests.
  • CMSO
    • Schedule Optimization with Automated Conflict Avoidance
    • Traffic Migration Workflow
  • OOF PCI Optimization
  • Slice creation and orchestration - Reach out to N.K. Shankaranarayanan
  • Non Functional requirements
    Goals
    • Improve documentation. Document as you code. New features must have mandatory documentation along with code.
    • CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role based access control and authorization for all calls

    • Move Helm Chart (OOM) at project level
    • CI/CD enhancement - Continuous Deployment (Comply with the requirements from Task force). Enhance existing CI jobs for Dublin.
    • Unit test coverage to 60% or 70%?
    Stretch Goals
    • Improve OOM deployment time for OOF helm charts. 

Use Cases

  • Fine-Grained Placement Service (F-GPS)

  • HPA - Hardening, Testing and Automation of vFW, vDNS, vCPE, VoLTE
  • CCVPN ? 
  • Change Management Dublin Extensions
  • Consistent ID of a Cloud Region (Dublin)


Minimum Viable Product

  • OOF-HAS - Homing Service that can be provides optimized placement based on policy constraints, across multiple clouds and multiple sites
  • OOF-OSDF - Optimization Design framework, that supports HAS, the Homing Optimizer

  • OOF-CMSO - ??

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Stories

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh


Longer term roadmap

Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
To fill outTo fill out

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance


  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability


  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency


  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security


  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability


  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability


  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability


  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation


  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
To fill outHigh level description of the APIDate for which the API is reviewed and agreedTo fill outLink toward the detailed API description
  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
To fill outHigh level description of the APIDate for which the API is reviewed and agreedTo fill outLink toward the detailed API description
  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

NameDescriptionVersion
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

  • Testing and Integration Plans

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

  • Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact
To fill outTo fill out
  • Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

  • Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out
  • Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out
  • Documentation, Training

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
  • Documentation includes items such as:
    • Installation instructions
    • Configuration instructions
    • Developer guide
    • End User guide
    • Admin guide
    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.

  • No labels