Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

General Information:

Agenda:

  • R3 High Level Requirements Review
  • Ongoing discussions
    • deprecate/obsolete attributes and datatypes
    • comparison with IFA spec

Material:

Minutes:

  • R3 High Level Requirements Review
    • Jessie's comment: should discuss composite pattern in resource IM interest group and also whole model level; details for acceleration requirement (wiki updated, check offline)
    • Chesla'a comment: seperate requirements for PNF (design time) and PNF instance (run time)
  • Deprecate issue
    • recommend to adopt IISOMI definitions of lifecycle sterotype
      • please see the material for detailed definitions and the related state machine diagram
      • states include: Example, Experimental, Faulty, LikeyToChange, Obsolete, Preliminary, Deprecated, & Mature
      • use of IISOMI lifecycle stereotypes and the related state machine diagram has been adopted by the resource modeling team via consensus
      • It was suggested that adoption of the lifecycle stereotypes and related diagram also be socialized at the modeling subcommittee level
    • need to decide whether label the current IM as "mature", "preliminary" or "experimental", and based on that, decide whether to label the proposed attributes/datatypes as "deprecate" or "obsolete"
      • Discussion seemed to be leaning toward current value of experimental or preliminary.
      • make a decision next week
    • have a discussion page for the OnapModelLifecycle sterotype
  • Comparison with IFA spec
    • Thinh suggest to update the comparison against the latest draft of IFA011
    • Kevin suggest to state that the R3 model is referencing the IFA011 v2.5.1
  • Suggested topics for next week's call
    • VNF run time model
    • deprecate issue
  • No labels