Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »



Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameCasablana
Project Lifecycle StateCore
Participating Company Amdocs, AT&T, Bell Canada, etc.

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

During the Casablanca release OOM will further the "Production" aspects of ONAP deployments by enabling geographic distribution, backup & restores, and elimination of extraneous database instances. In addition, during this release the OOM team will start to transfer ownership of OOM artifacts to the project teams should that wish to do so and accept the inherent responsibility of doing so.

Use Cases

OOM isn't impact by, nor does it impact ONAP use cases.

Minimum Viable Product

All of the changes being proposed enhance existing OOM capabilities and none are required to have a viable product.

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-10?jql=project%3D%22ONAP%20Operations%20Manager%22%20and%20issuetype%3DEpic%20and%20fixVersion%3D%22Casablanca%20Release%22%20and%20not%20status%3DClosed

Stories

https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-10?jql=project%3D%22ONAP%20Operations%20Manager%22%20and%20issuetype%3DStory%20and%20fixVersion%3D%22Casablanca%20Release%22%20and%20not%20status%3DClosed

Longer term roadmap

OOM will evolve to improve the production qualities of ONAP deployments and enable a wider variety of Cloud types including Kubernetes native public clouds.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
Helm chartsFurther enhancements to the existing set of ONAP helm charts.
Helm chartsExamples of custom deployment specifications to enable new features like auto-scaling.
DocumentationRead-the-docs documentation of new features.

Sub-Components

The Helm repo requested by the OOM team during the Beijing release is required (See LF #53102)

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

Not applicable.  OOM is the ONAP manager not an ONAP component.

Platform Maturity

OOM has already and will continue to provide capabilities to the project teams to fulfill 'platform maturity' but in itself can't achieve any of these goals. As for usability, no significant changes are planned to the OOM documentation. Test coverage doesn't apply as this is a DevOps project without traditional source code.

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance


  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability


  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency


  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security


  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability


  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability


  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability


  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation


  • API Incoming Dependencies

None.

  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

NameDescriptionVersion
KubernetesCloud Manager1.8.10+
HelmCloud Package Manager2.8.2+
ConsulHealth Monitor / State Managementlatest

The Integration team only tests with a Rancher deployment of K8s.

  • Testing and Integration Plans

Testing continues to be done by deploying ONAP and monitoring Robot automated tests including health checks.

  • Gaps

N/A

  • Known Defects and Issues

List of all known project bugs: 

https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-10?jql=project%3D%22ONAP%20Operations%20Manager%22%20and%20issuetype%3DBug%20and%20not%20status%3DClosed

  • Risks

As OOM is fully functional as is there are no significant risks to project.

  • Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • Team Internal Milestone

N/A

Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.

  • No labels