SDC R3 Release Planning
- 1 Overview
- 2 Scope
- 3 Release Deliverables
- 4 Sub-Components
- 5 Architecture
- 6 Testing and Integration Plans
- 7 Gaps
- 8 Known Defects and Issues
- 9 Risks -TBD
- 10 Resources
- 11 Release Milestone
- 12 Team Internal Milestone
- 13 Documentation, Training
- 13.1 Note
- 14 Other Information
- 15 Charter Compliance
- 16 Release Key Facts
Overview
Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
---|---|
Target Release Name | Casablanca |
Project Lifecycle State | Incubation |
Participating Company | Amdocs, AT&T, ZTE, Huawei, Intel,Nokia, Ericson |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
Platform Maturity (i.e., S3P items)
Resiliency
Level 1 - test only based on the work from Beijing
Scalability
Level 0
Stability
Level 1 will be a regression run on Casablanca release - anticipate this to be test only
Level 2 requirement is expected to be covered by the Integration team.
Security
Required Level 1
Reach CI badging passing level
Encrypted communication enable https support. sdc will work in a mixe mode http interface will continue working but internal comunication will be done using https.
aaf integration is a stretch goal based on the a risk from portal.
Performance
level 0 no work required.
Manageability
level 1
align with onap logging spec 1.2
Usability
level 1
User guide created update
Deployment documentation update
API documentation update
All new API’s must adhere to the ONAP API Common Versioning
Documentation updates (readthedocs) for Casablanca, such as, but not limited to:
Release Notes.
Enhance the available documentation to cover more of the application functionality and usability.
Functional requirments:
HPA
SDC will support the work done to support HPA in ONAP with the help from intel.
Change Management
SDC will support the work being done for the change management work
SDC will enhance our capability in designing workflows and complete the E2E flow between SDC and so with the help from Amdocs.
Scaling
SDC will support the work being done for the scaling work.
5G/PNF
the PNF support in sdc will be based on the capabilities from Beijing, no additional work is planned.
Architecture Alignment
sdc will start creating an infrastructure to support RTC
start supporting the sol004 csar pckage
HEAT support
sdc will continue to support the heat based deployment
Testing
enhance the sdc csit test scope
create cd testing for the sdc sub-components workflow and dcae-ds
add unit test coverage for the ui and reach 10% coverage
Enhancements
add more functionality to the sdc generic designer support
Use Cases
SDC will support the following use cases based on the current functionality:
SDC will continue to support:
Minimum Viable Product
SDC:
deliver all the need dockers and DB needed to support sdc functionality and the needed scripts for deploying it in HEAT heat and in OOM.
WORKFLOW:
deliver all the need dockers needed to support workflow designer functionality and the needed scripts for deploying it in HEAT heat and in OOM.
DCAE-DS:
deliver all the need dockers needed to support dcae-ds functionality and the needed scripts for deploying it in HEAT heat and in OOM.
SDC SDK's:
sdc-destribution-client
sdc-tosca
Functionalities
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.
Epics
Stories
Longer term roadmap
SDC aims to position itself as the main design IDE in ONAP. SDC works towards creating a fully model-driven design experience.
Release Deliverables
Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.
Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description | Deliverable Location |
---|---|---|
SDC Docker Images | Executable | Docker image available on nexus3 |
SDC TOSCA SDK | JAR file | Available on nexus as MAVEN dependency |
SDC | ||
Java Source Code | The Java code for the main SDC components. | sdc Git repositories |
Deployment Scripts | Chef recipes used to configure the Docker containers. | sdc Git repositories |
Sub-Components
List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-component must be in sync with the overall release.
Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.
subcomponents:
Jtosca
SDC Tosca
SDC Distribution Client
SDC base docker
SDC titan cassandra
SDC workflow designer
DCAE-DS
Architecture
High level architecture diagram
Platform Maturity
Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.
Area | Actual Level | Targeted Level for current Release | How, Evidences | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Performance | 0 | 0 |
| |
Stability | 1 | 2 |
| |
Resiliency | 1 | 1 |
| |
Security | 1 | 1+ AAF integration and https support |
| |
Scalability | 0 | 0 |
| |
Manageability | 1 | 1 |
| |
Usability | 1 | 1 |
|
API Incoming Dependencies
List the API this release is expecting from other releases.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.
Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Portal | user management APIs | crou api for user management | avilable | exposed by portal sdk |
destribution client | apis for retriving artifacts from catalog | download artifacts | avilable | exposed by sdc part of external apis. |
API Outgoing Dependencies
API this release is delivering to other releases.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
dmaap | using Cambria client | api for pushing and retrieving notifications | avilable | sdk |
Third Party Products Dependencies -TBD
Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).
Name | Description | Version |
---|---|---|
Cassandra | Open-source distributed storage system | 2.1.19 |
Docker | VM container | |
ElasticSearch | Search framework | 2.4.6 |
titan | Open-source, distributed graph database | 1.0.0 |
Jetty | Open-source application server | 9.3.X |
Ubuntu | Open-source software operating system | 16.0.4-LTS |
kibana | analytic disply server | 4.3.3 |
vnc | vnc server used for ui testing | ubuntu-xfce-vnc:1.3.0 |
In case there are specific dependencies (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.
Testing and Integration Plans
Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.
Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.
validate uses cases and pairwise testing of sdc with other components
enhance the csait to include more tests
Gaps
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
Gaps identified | Impact |
---|---|
N/A | N/A |
Known Defects and Issues
Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.
Risks -TBD
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialize (contingency).
Risk identified | Mitigation Plan | Contingency Plan |
---|---|---|
sdc aaf integration | none | move integration to dublin |
Resources
Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.
Release Milestone
The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
Team Internal Milestone
This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.
It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.
Date | Project | Deliverable |
---|---|---|
To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
Documentation, Training
Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
Documentation includes items such as:
Installation instructions
Configuration instructions
Developer guide
End User guide
Admin guide
Note
The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.
Other Information
Vendor Neutral
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
Free and Open Source Software
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.
Release Key Facts
Fill out and provide a link toward the centralized Release Artifacts.