Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Background:

Current resource information model has all objects categorized as "class". Comments received state that some of them should be “Datatype” instead of “Class”.

The proposal is to follow the ETSI IFA015 v2.4.1 document to change some of the objects to be categorized as "Datatype".

This page shows the current proposal and collects feedback within 1 week's time (until Apr. 22, while recommend to feedback before Apr. 20).


Current Proposal:

ClassDatatype
VnfdVirtualCpuData
VduVirtualMemoryData
SwImageDescLogicalNodeData
VirtualComputeDescLinkBitrateRequirements
VirtualStorageDescScaleInfo
CpdQoS
VduCpdLocalAffinityOrAntiAffinityRule
VnfExtCpdAddressData
VduProfileL2AddressData
VirtualNetworkInterfaceRequirementsL3AddressData
VnfVirtualLinkDescCpProtocolData
VnfDfConnectivityType
VirtualLinkProfileVirtualCpuPinningData
VirtualLinkDescFlavourRequestedAdditionalCapabilityData
InstantiationLevelVnfConfigurableProperties
VduLevelVnfcConfigurableProperties
AffinityOrAntiAffinityGroupLifecycleManagementScript
VnfIndicatorMonitoringParameter
VnfdElementGroupVnfInfoModifiableAttributes
PlacementGroup (Experimental)
BaseConfigGroup (Experimental)
DeploymentGroup (Experimental)



Comments received state that some of them should be “Data type” instead of “Class”


  • No labels