Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 13 Next »

BRIDGE: https://zoom.us/j/661303200

http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrustpolicy

Attendance 

AttendedProxy (w/ @name)Gov. HolidayDid Not Attend

Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat 

Time
(mins)


Agenda Items


Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/

 30

 TCC Update - Network Management

15

Release Status

5

RelEng/Infrastructure

  • Tickets- Open showstoppers:
    • IT-18686 - Sonar report inconsistent for dcaegen2 heartbeat. Fix idetified
  • Pending Users
    • IT-18874 - I want the docker repositary to be cleaned
  • Migration SonarCloud Update  
    • Planning to disable SonarCube on Feb. 20
  • Gerrit updates needed

5

PTL Update

Anything to revisit?:   Security tests integration in ONAP CI chains - https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/5870

10

Subcommittee Update

(This week in red)
Arch, Ctrl-Loop, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Usecase

Summary of to discuss Architecture process discussion

5

TSC Activities and Deadlines

action item list review

Mentorship program

5

Incoming Events

  • Certified ONAP Professional (COP) Beta Deadline is Feb 15th - https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/5878
  • Open Networking & Edge Summit (ONES), NA, Los Angeles, April 20 - 21
    • ONAP TSC submitted the following abstract:: ONAP and Cloud Native – The Best of the Two Worlds
  • ONAP 2 day event after ONES North America - April 22nd-24th (TBC) - Los Angeles
  • LFN Developer and Testing Forum, Seoul, South Korea, June 1-4, 2020
  • ONAP 2 day event after ONS North Europe - Antwerp (TBC)
  • Survey coming from LFN for Dec OR Jan for steady-state full DDF meetings to all LFN communities & locations

5

Additional Housekeeping

Linux Foundation

10

Available Slot



10

Available Slot




Action Items

  • Kenny Paul  add discussion of Arch-sub review versus PTL determination of their project status to next weeks agenda  
  • Kenny Paul move exception process discussion to next weeks agenda  

Zoom Chat Log 

05:58:49 From Alla Goldner : #info Alla Goldner, Amdocs
05:59:52 From Sai Seshu : #info Seshu huawei
06:00:02 From Dong Wang (China Telecom) : #info proxy Zonghe Huang, China Telecom
06:00:27 From Lingli : #info Lingli CMCC
06:00:28 From Srini Addepalli (Intel) : #info Srini Addepalli, Intel
06:00:37 From Andreas Geissler : #info Andreas Geissler, DT
06:01:00 From Ranny Haiby (Samsung) : #info Ranny Haiby, Samsung
06:01:33 From Martial Ngueko(AT&T) : #info proxy Catherine Lefèvre, AT&T
06:02:41 From Eric Debeau : #info Eric Debeau, Orange
06:03:14 From Jason Hunt : #info Jason Hunt, IBM
06:03:19 From Olivier Phenix : #info Olivier Phenix (proxy), Bell Canada
06:05:05 From Timo Perala (Nokia) : #info Timo Perala, Nokia
06:05:33 From Murat Turpcu,Turk Telekom : #info Murat TURPCU,Türk Telekom
06:07:09 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic TCC update - network management
06:07:31 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #info requesting approval from the TSC
06:21:07 From Viswa ( Verizon ) : #info Viswa, Verizon
06:30:57 From Eric Debeau : VES API Specification is here: https://docs.onap.org/en/elalto/submodules/dcaegen2.git/docs/sections/apis/ves.html
06:31:04 From John Quilty : #info proxy John Quilty Ericsson for Ciaran Johnston
06:32:40 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #info Magnus presented the slides attached to the minutes
06:32:51 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #discussion of the specifics
06:34:30 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #discussion of a LFN TAC level solution to address this not only for 3GPP but for all SDOs as the problem is a general one impacting all of them
06:35:22 From Srini Addepalli (Intel) : @Magnus, If VES is being provided as a choice by 3GPP SA5, there may be a need for ONAP VES specification team to know about 3GPP specification changes & 3GPP new requirements, at least the ones that need changes to VES specifications.
06:37:15 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #request was originally submitted in October 2019
06:43:37 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #@Lingli asks about timing.
06:44:25 From Srini Addepalli (Intel) : I always thought VES specifications are developed elsewhere and ONAP only implements it on the collection side. Is VES specification work moved to ONAP? VIjay?
06:45:47 From Vijay Venkatesh Kumar (AT&T) : @Srini - yes, VES Specification are maintained under ONAP. This has been case since Casablanca rls.
06:46:13 From Eric Debeau : It was initially published under OPNFV...But has moved to ONAP
06:47:31 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : does the TSC approve the 3 requests from 3GPP eastblishing as found on slide 3 of the "TCC Generic Network Management_Prague_3GPP SA5_LS.pdf" deck as attached to these minutes?
06:48:57 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : scratch that :-)
06:49:04 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : new text
06:49:09 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : does the TSC approve the 3 requests from 3GPP as outlined on slide 3 of the "TCC Generic Network Management_Prague_3GPP SA5_LS.pdf" deck as attached to these minutes
06:51:21 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #vote does the TSC approve the responsew to the 3 requests from 3GPP as outlined on slide 3 of the "TCC Generic Network Management_Prague_3GPP SA5_LS.pdf" deck as attached to these minutes? +1, 0 -1
06:51:32 From Vijay Venkatesh Kumar (AT&T) : VES Spec link - https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Implementing+Code+Coverage#ImplementingCodeCoverage-Python
06:51:36 From Andreas Geissler : #vote +1
06:51:36 From Jason Hunt : #vote +1
06:51:43 From John Quilty : #vote +1
06:51:44 From Srini Addepalli (Intel) : #vote +1
06:51:45 From Eric Debeau : #vote +1
06:51:49 From Alla Goldner : #vote +1
06:51:50 From Timo Perala (Nokia) : #vote +1
06:51:50 From Martial Ngueko(AT&T) : #vote +1
06:51:51 From Sai Seshu : #vote +1
06:51:52 From Ranny Haiby (Samsung) : #vote +1
06:51:59 From Lingli : #vote +1
06:52:00 From Dong Wang (China Telecom) : #vote +1
06:52:30 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #endvote
06:52:38 From Vijay Venkatesh Kumar (AT&T) : VES Spec - https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/vnfrqts/requirements.git/docs/Chapter8/ves7_1spec.html API Link (under DCAE) - https://docs.onap.org/en/latest/submodules/dcaegen2.git/docs/sections/apis/ves.html Both links will be updated as VES spec updates are made
06:53:43 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #AGREED the TSC approves the response to the 3 requests from 3GPP as outlined on slide 3 of the "TCC Generic Network Management_Prague_3GPP SA5_LS.pdf" deck as attached to these minutes.
06:54:44 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic Release Management
06:59:05 From Pawel Pawlak : I am sorry, I have to drop to an another meeting
07:00:49 From Srini Addepalli (Intel) : Have to drop now, due to an important meeting
07:08:48 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #@chaker reports that AAI, DMaaP, EXTAPI, MSB, Music, Multicloud, Portal, SDC, VID, VNFSDK, VVP have not been through Arch-Sub review
07:10:37 From Jimmy Forsyth (AT&T) : The language on the ticket was "Complete a review by the architectural subcommittee if any interface to your project has externally visible architecture changes."
07:22:07 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION add discussion of Arch-sub review versus PTL determination of their project status to next weeks agends
07:23:24 From David McBride : The TSC approves all projects that have met M2/M3 milestone requirements since last week.
07:23:31 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #AGREED the TSC approves REQ-140, REQ 134, REQ-76, REQ-174 and "Modeling: documentation of allotted resource model" as being in the Frankfurt release.
07:23:56 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #AGREED the TSC descopes REQ-136 from the Frankfurt release.
07:24:24 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #AGREED The TSC approves all projects that have met M2/M3 milestone requirements since last week.
07:25:17 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #M$ coming up on March 5
07:25:46 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #M4 milestone coming up on March 5
07:26:58 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION move exception to next weeks agends
07:27:20 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic RelEng/Infrastructure
07:29:53 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #AGREED the TSC approves SonarCube decommission on Feb 20
07:31:45 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/5896


  • No labels